非正式长期关系中对伴侣的保护

Jens M. Scherpe
{"title":"非正式长期关系中对伴侣的保护","authors":"Jens M. Scherpe","doi":"10.1163/157180405774580017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I. The need for protection informal cohabitation outside of marriage is a fact of life in western countries. its incidence and significance varies in different countries, but in all states it is increasingly common. The reasons for this are manifold, ranging from informed decisions to indifference to legal consequences. Many children live in these relationships, often from previous relationships with other partners. historically, the law’s basic attitude towards cohabitation relationships is summarized by the famous quote by napoléon: “Les concubins ignorent la loi, la loi ignore donc les concubins”. however, this is no longer true. Many countries have legislated extensively on cohabitation, acknowledging at least its existence and relevance for society. even in countries where there is no such extensive legislation, such as Germany and england, it cannot be said that the law is silent with regard to cohabitants. not only do many statutes refer, or apply, to cohabitants, but in many court decisions the law had to take a stance towards cohabitation, often resorting to curious constructs in order to arrive at just and fair results. Sometimes the results have been far from satisfying1 and arguably they lack an underlying coherent structure. Some have argued that this merely reflects the normal chaos of life and indeed family law.2 But can the state and society as a whole really afford to stand aside and watch the chaos and its consequences unfold? let me give some examples of those consequences. in the case of children, there is universal agreement that it is not their fault that their parents were not","PeriodicalId":148959,"journal":{"name":"International Law Forum Du Droit International","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protection of Partners in Informal Long-Term Relationships\",\"authors\":\"Jens M. Scherpe\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/157180405774580017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I. The need for protection informal cohabitation outside of marriage is a fact of life in western countries. its incidence and significance varies in different countries, but in all states it is increasingly common. The reasons for this are manifold, ranging from informed decisions to indifference to legal consequences. Many children live in these relationships, often from previous relationships with other partners. historically, the law’s basic attitude towards cohabitation relationships is summarized by the famous quote by napoléon: “Les concubins ignorent la loi, la loi ignore donc les concubins”. however, this is no longer true. Many countries have legislated extensively on cohabitation, acknowledging at least its existence and relevance for society. even in countries where there is no such extensive legislation, such as Germany and england, it cannot be said that the law is silent with regard to cohabitants. not only do many statutes refer, or apply, to cohabitants, but in many court decisions the law had to take a stance towards cohabitation, often resorting to curious constructs in order to arrive at just and fair results. Sometimes the results have been far from satisfying1 and arguably they lack an underlying coherent structure. Some have argued that this merely reflects the normal chaos of life and indeed family law.2 But can the state and society as a whole really afford to stand aside and watch the chaos and its consequences unfold? let me give some examples of those consequences. in the case of children, there is universal agreement that it is not their fault that their parents were not\",\"PeriodicalId\":148959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Law Forum Du Droit International\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Law Forum Du Droit International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/157180405774580017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Law Forum Du Droit International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/157180405774580017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在西方国家,婚外非正式同居是生活中的一个事实。它的发病率和重要性在不同的国家有所不同,但在所有州都越来越普遍。造成这种情况的原因是多方面的,从知情的决定到对法律后果的漠不关心。许多孩子生活在这样的关系中,通常来自于以前与其他伴侣的关系。从历史上看,法律对同居关系的基本态度可以用拿破仑的那句名言来概括:“妾不睬妾,妾不睬妾”。然而,这已不再是事实。许多国家对同居进行了广泛的立法,至少承认同居的存在及其对社会的影响。即使在没有这种广泛立法的国家,如德国和英国,也不能说法律对同居者保持沉默。不仅许多法规涉及或适用于同居,而且在许多法院判决中,法律必须对同居采取立场,经常诉诸奇怪的结构,以达到公正和公平的结果。有时结果远不能令人满意,可以说它们缺乏一个潜在的连贯结构。一些人认为,这只是反映了正常的生活混乱,实际上反映了家庭法但是,作为一个整体,国家和社会真的能够站在一边,看着混乱及其后果展开吗?让我举几个例子来说明这些后果。就儿童而言,人们普遍认为,他们的父母没有这样做并不是他们的错
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Protection of Partners in Informal Long-Term Relationships
I. The need for protection informal cohabitation outside of marriage is a fact of life in western countries. its incidence and significance varies in different countries, but in all states it is increasingly common. The reasons for this are manifold, ranging from informed decisions to indifference to legal consequences. Many children live in these relationships, often from previous relationships with other partners. historically, the law’s basic attitude towards cohabitation relationships is summarized by the famous quote by napoléon: “Les concubins ignorent la loi, la loi ignore donc les concubins”. however, this is no longer true. Many countries have legislated extensively on cohabitation, acknowledging at least its existence and relevance for society. even in countries where there is no such extensive legislation, such as Germany and england, it cannot be said that the law is silent with regard to cohabitants. not only do many statutes refer, or apply, to cohabitants, but in many court decisions the law had to take a stance towards cohabitation, often resorting to curious constructs in order to arrive at just and fair results. Sometimes the results have been far from satisfying1 and arguably they lack an underlying coherent structure. Some have argued that this merely reflects the normal chaos of life and indeed family law.2 But can the state and society as a whole really afford to stand aside and watch the chaos and its consequences unfold? let me give some examples of those consequences. in the case of children, there is universal agreement that it is not their fault that their parents were not
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The UN High-level Panel Report and the Proposed Institutional Reform of the UN: Would the UN be ready to face the New Challenges? "International Law in Europe: Between Tradition and Renewal" – The Inaugural Conference of the European Society of International Law The Continuing Controversy over Provisional Measures in International Disputes The Imbalance of the International Law System The United States Supreme Court Rulings on Detention of "Enemy Combatants" – Partial Vindication of the Rule of Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1