狄奥多罗斯用悟性证明不可通约性

S. Negrepontis, G. Tassopoulos
{"title":"狄奥多罗斯用悟性证明不可通约性","authors":"S. Negrepontis, G. Tassopoulos","doi":"10.1080/17498430.2015.1055156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An ‘infinite decreasing sequence of Gnomons’ is characteristic, according to Proclus, of incommensurability, hence David Fowler's idea to reconstruct Theodorus’ proofs of incommensurabilities, reported in the Theaetetus147d, employing Gnomons, is attractive and solidly based. The ‘preservation of the shape of the Gnomons’ is a form of the Pythagorean principle of the Limited according to Aristotle. In the present paper we propose a reconstruction that employs Gnomons but is free of the drawbacks present in Fowler's reconstruction.","PeriodicalId":211442,"journal":{"name":"BSHM Bulletin: Journal of the British Society for the History of Mathematics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Theodorus’ proofs of incommensurabilities with Gnomons\",\"authors\":\"S. Negrepontis, G. Tassopoulos\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17498430.2015.1055156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An ‘infinite decreasing sequence of Gnomons’ is characteristic, according to Proclus, of incommensurability, hence David Fowler's idea to reconstruct Theodorus’ proofs of incommensurabilities, reported in the Theaetetus147d, employing Gnomons, is attractive and solidly based. The ‘preservation of the shape of the Gnomons’ is a form of the Pythagorean principle of the Limited according to Aristotle. In the present paper we propose a reconstruction that employs Gnomons but is free of the drawbacks present in Fowler's reconstruction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":211442,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BSHM Bulletin: Journal of the British Society for the History of Mathematics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BSHM Bulletin: Journal of the British Society for the History of Mathematics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17498430.2015.1055156\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BSHM Bulletin: Journal of the British Society for the History of Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17498430.2015.1055156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据普罗克罗斯的说法,一个“无限递减的Gnomons序列”是不可通约性的特征,因此大卫·福勒在《Theaetetus147d》中报道的重建Theodorus不可通约性证明的想法,使用Gnomons,是有吸引力和坚实基础的。按照亚里士多德的说法,“保持地神的形状”是毕达哥拉斯的有限原则的一种形式。在本文中,我们提出了一种使用侏儒的重建,但没有福勒重建中存在的缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Theodorus’ proofs of incommensurabilities with Gnomons
An ‘infinite decreasing sequence of Gnomons’ is characteristic, according to Proclus, of incommensurability, hence David Fowler's idea to reconstruct Theodorus’ proofs of incommensurabilities, reported in the Theaetetus147d, employing Gnomons, is attractive and solidly based. The ‘preservation of the shape of the Gnomons’ is a form of the Pythagorean principle of the Limited according to Aristotle. In the present paper we propose a reconstruction that employs Gnomons but is free of the drawbacks present in Fowler's reconstruction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What became of Paul Dirac’s classmate? Wonders beyond numbers: A brief history of all things mathematical, by Johnny Ball Un Altro Presente: on the historical interpretation of mathematical texts Game, set, and graph American mathematics 1890–1913: catching up to Europe, by Steve Batterson
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1