T. Sidiropoulou, Aikaterini Karaferi, George Stachtos, Maria Alepaki, A. Karakosta, M. Dauri, G. Kostopanagiotou
{"title":"异丙酚而非七氟醚降低结直肠癌手术后循环中sEGFR和硒选择素水平","authors":"T. Sidiropoulou, Aikaterini Karaferi, George Stachtos, Maria Alepaki, A. Karakosta, M. Dauri, G. Kostopanagiotou","doi":"10.5114/amscd.2019.86740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Surgery and anaesthesia may affect the outcomes of cancer. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of propofol or sevoflurane on cancer biomarkers such as interleukins, adhesion molecules, and EGFR. Material and methods: Eighty patients scheduled for colorectal cancer surgery were randomised to either propofol or sevoflurane anaesthesia. Blood samples for interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), interferon α (IFN-α), soluble intracellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1), soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1), sE-selectin, and sEGFR measurements were obtained before induction of anaesthesia, at the end of surgery, and 72 h postoperatively. Results: Complete samples were obtained from 71 patients. Demographic data and anaesthesia/surgery-related data were similar between the two groups. There were significant differences produced by sevoflurane vs. propofol on the sE-selectin (median (IQR) 57.1 (59.2) vs. 42.7 (22.9) ng/ml, p = 0.011) and sEGFR (median (IQR) 49905.7 (22673.5) vs. 25.657.2 (13842.1) ng/ml, p < 0.001) concentrations postoperatively, while sEGFR plasma levels also showed a significant difference during surgery (median (IQR) 32964.5 (14402.5) vs. 25567.0 (13315.4) ng/ml, p = 0.04). IL-10 levels were significantly higher in the propofol group postoperatively (median (IQR) 13.7 (18.5) vs. 14.9 (66.6) pg/ml, p = 0.05). Conclusions: Given the role of EGFR and adhesion molecules on tumour progression and the generation of metastases, the inhibitory effect of propofol observed in this study might prove useful in the future. Further studies in larger populations investigating the effect of anaesthetic agents on these biomarkers are warranted.","PeriodicalId":169652,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Medical Science - Civilization Diseases","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Propofol but not sevoflurane decreases circulating levels of sEGFR and sE-selectin after colorectal cancer surgery\",\"authors\":\"T. Sidiropoulou, Aikaterini Karaferi, George Stachtos, Maria Alepaki, A. Karakosta, M. Dauri, G. Kostopanagiotou\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/amscd.2019.86740\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Surgery and anaesthesia may affect the outcomes of cancer. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of propofol or sevoflurane on cancer biomarkers such as interleukins, adhesion molecules, and EGFR. Material and methods: Eighty patients scheduled for colorectal cancer surgery were randomised to either propofol or sevoflurane anaesthesia. Blood samples for interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), interferon α (IFN-α), soluble intracellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1), soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1), sE-selectin, and sEGFR measurements were obtained before induction of anaesthesia, at the end of surgery, and 72 h postoperatively. Results: Complete samples were obtained from 71 patients. Demographic data and anaesthesia/surgery-related data were similar between the two groups. There were significant differences produced by sevoflurane vs. propofol on the sE-selectin (median (IQR) 57.1 (59.2) vs. 42.7 (22.9) ng/ml, p = 0.011) and sEGFR (median (IQR) 49905.7 (22673.5) vs. 25.657.2 (13842.1) ng/ml, p < 0.001) concentrations postoperatively, while sEGFR plasma levels also showed a significant difference during surgery (median (IQR) 32964.5 (14402.5) vs. 25567.0 (13315.4) ng/ml, p = 0.04). IL-10 levels were significantly higher in the propofol group postoperatively (median (IQR) 13.7 (18.5) vs. 14.9 (66.6) pg/ml, p = 0.05). Conclusions: Given the role of EGFR and adhesion molecules on tumour progression and the generation of metastases, the inhibitory effect of propofol observed in this study might prove useful in the future. Further studies in larger populations investigating the effect of anaesthetic agents on these biomarkers are warranted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":169652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Medical Science - Civilization Diseases\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Medical Science - Civilization Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/amscd.2019.86740\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Medical Science - Civilization Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/amscd.2019.86740","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
手术和麻醉可能影响癌症的预后。该研究的目的是评估异丙酚或七氟醚对癌症生物标志物(如白细胞介素、粘附分子和EGFR)的影响。材料和方法:80例结肠直肠癌手术患者随机分为异丙酚组和七氟醚组。在麻醉诱导前、手术结束时和术后72 h采集血液样本,检测白细胞介素(IL)-6、IL-8、IL-10、肿瘤坏死因子α (TNF-α)、干扰素α (IFN-α)、可溶性细胞内粘附分子-1 (sICAM-1)、可溶性血管细胞粘附分子-1 (sVCAM-1)、硒选择素和sEGFR。结果:71例患者标本完整。两组的人口学数据和麻醉/手术相关数据相似。七氟醚与异丙酚对术后se -选择素(中位数(IQR) 57.1 (59.2) vs. 42.7 (22.9) ng/ml, p = 0.011)和sEGFR(中位数(IQR) 49905.7 (22673.5) vs. 25.657.2 (13842.1) ng/ml, p < 0.001)浓度产生显著差异,术中sEGFR血浆水平也显示显著差异(中位数(IQR) 32964.5 (14402.5) vs. 25567.0 (13315.4) ng/ml, p = 0.04)。术后异丙酚组IL-10水平明显升高(IQR中位数为13.7(18.5)比14.9 (66.6)pg/ml, p = 0.05)。结论:考虑到EGFR和粘附分子在肿瘤进展和转移产生中的作用,本研究中观察到的异丙酚的抑制作用可能在未来被证明是有用的。在更大的人群中进一步研究麻醉药对这些生物标志物的影响是有必要的。
Propofol but not sevoflurane decreases circulating levels of sEGFR and sE-selectin after colorectal cancer surgery
Introduction: Surgery and anaesthesia may affect the outcomes of cancer. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of propofol or sevoflurane on cancer biomarkers such as interleukins, adhesion molecules, and EGFR. Material and methods: Eighty patients scheduled for colorectal cancer surgery were randomised to either propofol or sevoflurane anaesthesia. Blood samples for interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), interferon α (IFN-α), soluble intracellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1), soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1), sE-selectin, and sEGFR measurements were obtained before induction of anaesthesia, at the end of surgery, and 72 h postoperatively. Results: Complete samples were obtained from 71 patients. Demographic data and anaesthesia/surgery-related data were similar between the two groups. There were significant differences produced by sevoflurane vs. propofol on the sE-selectin (median (IQR) 57.1 (59.2) vs. 42.7 (22.9) ng/ml, p = 0.011) and sEGFR (median (IQR) 49905.7 (22673.5) vs. 25.657.2 (13842.1) ng/ml, p < 0.001) concentrations postoperatively, while sEGFR plasma levels also showed a significant difference during surgery (median (IQR) 32964.5 (14402.5) vs. 25567.0 (13315.4) ng/ml, p = 0.04). IL-10 levels were significantly higher in the propofol group postoperatively (median (IQR) 13.7 (18.5) vs. 14.9 (66.6) pg/ml, p = 0.05). Conclusions: Given the role of EGFR and adhesion molecules on tumour progression and the generation of metastases, the inhibitory effect of propofol observed in this study might prove useful in the future. Further studies in larger populations investigating the effect of anaesthetic agents on these biomarkers are warranted.