印尼隐私权的困境:印尼肃贪委员会(KPK)监视人民是否违反国际人权法以保护隐私权?

D. Wijaya
{"title":"印尼隐私权的困境:印尼肃贪委员会(KPK)监视人民是否违反国际人权法以保护隐私权?","authors":"D. Wijaya","doi":"10.21107/tlr.v1i1.5254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Corruption is a serious crime in Indonesia. Indonesia commonly recognize that Corruption as extra ordinary crime that has to be combated by extra ordinary means as well. Interception has been determined as the best way to reduce the number of these engaged in corruption, Indonesia is adherence to some international human rights instrument aims to support the basic rights of the people. The scope of the concept of privacy, in some theorists’ perspective has sailed to be properly conceptualized. In addition, the international community recognizes privacy is a fundamental human right which is well-described in several Conventions. This reflects the importance of the right to privacy for every individual in the world, either for adult, children or for people who have disabilities. Some of the interception actions done by the KPK, do not comply with the international principles on human rights in electronic surveillance actions. This means Indonesia must improve its laws through adding some articles in order to fully comply with international principles on human rights in electronic surveillance actions. The research method used is normative juridical, normative juridical is research based on the analysis of legal materials in the form of several legal principles and several legal theories as well as laws and regulations that are in accordance with the problems in this study.","PeriodicalId":164831,"journal":{"name":"Trunojoyo Law Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Dillem Of The Right To Privacy In Indonesia: Does Indonesia’s Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) in Spying People Violate International Human Rights Laws to Protect the Right to Privacy?\",\"authors\":\"D. Wijaya\",\"doi\":\"10.21107/tlr.v1i1.5254\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Corruption is a serious crime in Indonesia. Indonesia commonly recognize that Corruption as extra ordinary crime that has to be combated by extra ordinary means as well. Interception has been determined as the best way to reduce the number of these engaged in corruption, Indonesia is adherence to some international human rights instrument aims to support the basic rights of the people. The scope of the concept of privacy, in some theorists’ perspective has sailed to be properly conceptualized. In addition, the international community recognizes privacy is a fundamental human right which is well-described in several Conventions. This reflects the importance of the right to privacy for every individual in the world, either for adult, children or for people who have disabilities. Some of the interception actions done by the KPK, do not comply with the international principles on human rights in electronic surveillance actions. This means Indonesia must improve its laws through adding some articles in order to fully comply with international principles on human rights in electronic surveillance actions. The research method used is normative juridical, normative juridical is research based on the analysis of legal materials in the form of several legal principles and several legal theories as well as laws and regulations that are in accordance with the problems in this study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":164831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trunojoyo Law Review\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trunojoyo Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21107/tlr.v1i1.5254\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trunojoyo Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21107/tlr.v1i1.5254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

腐败在印度尼西亚是一种严重的罪行。印度尼西亚普遍认为,腐败是一种非常普通的犯罪,必须采取非常普通的手段加以打击。拦截已被确定为减少这些参与腐败的人数的最佳方式,印度尼西亚正在遵守一些旨在支持人民基本权利的国际人权文书。在一些理论家看来,隐私概念的范围已经被适当地概念化了。此外,国际社会承认隐私权是一项基本人权,在若干公约中有很好的描述。这反映了世界上每个人的隐私权的重要性,无论是成人、儿童还是残疾人。廉政公署的一些拦截行动,并不符合国际上有关电子监视行动的人权原则。这意味着印度尼西亚必须通过增加一些条款来改进其法律,以便充分遵守关于电子监视行动中的人权的国际原则。本文采用的研究方法是规范法学,规范法学是以几种法理和几种法理以及法律法规的形式对法律材料进行分析的基础上进行的研究,这些法律材料与本文研究的问题相吻合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Dillem Of The Right To Privacy In Indonesia: Does Indonesia’s Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) in Spying People Violate International Human Rights Laws to Protect the Right to Privacy?
Corruption is a serious crime in Indonesia. Indonesia commonly recognize that Corruption as extra ordinary crime that has to be combated by extra ordinary means as well. Interception has been determined as the best way to reduce the number of these engaged in corruption, Indonesia is adherence to some international human rights instrument aims to support the basic rights of the people. The scope of the concept of privacy, in some theorists’ perspective has sailed to be properly conceptualized. In addition, the international community recognizes privacy is a fundamental human right which is well-described in several Conventions. This reflects the importance of the right to privacy for every individual in the world, either for adult, children or for people who have disabilities. Some of the interception actions done by the KPK, do not comply with the international principles on human rights in electronic surveillance actions. This means Indonesia must improve its laws through adding some articles in order to fully comply with international principles on human rights in electronic surveillance actions. The research method used is normative juridical, normative juridical is research based on the analysis of legal materials in the form of several legal principles and several legal theories as well as laws and regulations that are in accordance with the problems in this study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Legal Issues in the Implementation of Excise Tariffs on Cigarette Companies in Madura Legal Issues of Ganti Tikar Marriage in Bugis Wajo Custom in East Tanjung Jabung Regency Regional Regulation Problems in the Field of Salt Industry Development Perspective of Farmers in Sampang Regency A Model of Election Supervision Based on Village Judicial Institutions; A Review of Legal Anthropology in Madura Regional Government Strategies to Preserve the Keris Industry in Sumenep
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1