从德国视角评介《示范刑法典》第三、四部分:德国惩教实践法定规制的基础

Bernd Schüünemann
{"title":"从德国视角评介《示范刑法典》第三、四部分:德国惩教实践法定规制的基础","authors":"Bernd Schüünemann","doi":"10.1525/NCLR.2003.7.1.233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As is the case in the United States today, only the basics of the legal position of inmates were regulated by statute in Germany pre-1976. According to both case law and academic writing, a conviction, which was properly based on the criminal and criminal procedure codes, provided a sufficient basis for the limitation of the rights of inmates. This was predicated on the view that a conviction established a special relationship of subordination, the extent of which could be defined more precisely by the correctional authorities using their own discretion. In 1972, the German Constitutional Court handed down a now famous decision which held this state of affairs to be unconstitutional. Any limitations on the fundamental rights of inmates, which were consistently and comprehensively imposed, had to be regulated comprehensively, and in detail, by the legislature. Hence, the enacting of a Correctional Code was mandated by the Constitution. The legislature was forced to enact the Correctional Code in 1976. In more than 200 sections, the law regulates in detail every aspect of imprisonment and","PeriodicalId":344882,"journal":{"name":"Buffalo Criminal Law Review","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Some Comments on Parts III and IV of the Model Penal Code from a German Perspective: Fundamentals of the Statutory Regulation of Correctional Practice in Germany\",\"authors\":\"Bernd Schüünemann\",\"doi\":\"10.1525/NCLR.2003.7.1.233\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As is the case in the United States today, only the basics of the legal position of inmates were regulated by statute in Germany pre-1976. According to both case law and academic writing, a conviction, which was properly based on the criminal and criminal procedure codes, provided a sufficient basis for the limitation of the rights of inmates. This was predicated on the view that a conviction established a special relationship of subordination, the extent of which could be defined more precisely by the correctional authorities using their own discretion. In 1972, the German Constitutional Court handed down a now famous decision which held this state of affairs to be unconstitutional. Any limitations on the fundamental rights of inmates, which were consistently and comprehensively imposed, had to be regulated comprehensively, and in detail, by the legislature. Hence, the enacting of a Correctional Code was mandated by the Constitution. The legislature was forced to enact the Correctional Code in 1976. In more than 200 sections, the law regulates in detail every aspect of imprisonment and\",\"PeriodicalId\":344882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Buffalo Criminal Law Review\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Buffalo Criminal Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1525/NCLR.2003.7.1.233\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Buffalo Criminal Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/NCLR.2003.7.1.233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

和今天美国的情况一样,1976年以前,德国只有基本的囚犯法律地位是由法律规定的。根据判例法和学术著作,适当根据刑法和刑事诉讼法的定罪,为限制囚犯的权利提供了充分的依据。这是基于这样一种观点,即定罪建立了一种特殊的从属关系,这种关系的程度可以由惩教当局自行酌处更精确地界定。1972年,德国宪法法院做出了一项现在很有名的决定,认为这种情况违宪。对囚犯基本权利的任何限制都是一贯和全面施加的,必须由立法机关全面和详细地加以管制。因此,《宪法》责成颁布《惩教法》。立法机关被迫于1976年颁布了《惩教法典》。该法律在200多个章节中详细规定了监禁和监禁的各个方面
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Some Comments on Parts III and IV of the Model Penal Code from a German Perspective: Fundamentals of the Statutory Regulation of Correctional Practice in Germany
As is the case in the United States today, only the basics of the legal position of inmates were regulated by statute in Germany pre-1976. According to both case law and academic writing, a conviction, which was properly based on the criminal and criminal procedure codes, provided a sufficient basis for the limitation of the rights of inmates. This was predicated on the view that a conviction established a special relationship of subordination, the extent of which could be defined more precisely by the correctional authorities using their own discretion. In 1972, the German Constitutional Court handed down a now famous decision which held this state of affairs to be unconstitutional. Any limitations on the fundamental rights of inmates, which were consistently and comprehensively imposed, had to be regulated comprehensively, and in detail, by the legislature. Hence, the enacting of a Correctional Code was mandated by the Constitution. The legislature was forced to enact the Correctional Code in 1976. In more than 200 sections, the law regulates in detail every aspect of imprisonment and
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Murder After the Merger: A Commentary on Finkelstein Group Violence and Group Vengeance: Toward a Retributivist Theory of International Criminal Law Benthamite Reflections on Codification of the General Principles of Criminal Liability: Towards the Panopticon The Politics of Grace: On the Moral Justification of Executive Clemency Toward a Better Categorical Balance of the Costs and Benefits of the Exclusionary Rule
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1