公众朋友与私人分享:了解分享文化中隐私的转变

Z. Sujon, Lisette Johnston
{"title":"公众朋友与私人分享:了解分享文化中隐私的转变","authors":"Z. Sujon, Lisette Johnston","doi":"10.1145/3097286.3097305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper seeks to address the tension between privacy and sharing culture. Despite many claims that privacy is dead, research suggests that there is a shift from privacy as an individualized right based around control to something more social, more embedded, more public and more networked. Drawing from seven media diaries, interviews with those diarists and a survey (N=270) of London, UK residents aged 18-36, we aim for a better picture of privacy and sharing culture as lived experiences. Based on this evidence, we identify a number of themes. First, privacy matters. Although respondents identify sharing as embedded and networked, their experiences and understanding of privacy remains more traditional. For most, privacy is an individualized right focused on control. In addition, we find several themes emerging from the data -- social privacy is more important than institutional privacy; younger respondents talk about \"public friends\" and \"private sharing\" to justify and explain their sharing practices; respondents also commonly talk about a 'persona' on social media profiles; and finally, respondents are increasingly depersonalizing what they share on social media. All of these themes point to ways that respondents exercise sharing strategies in part to protect their privacy, but also for managing the sharing expectations of their social media use and sharing culture more broadly.","PeriodicalId":130378,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Social Media & Society","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public Friends and Private Sharing: Understanding Shifting Privacies in Sharing Culture\",\"authors\":\"Z. Sujon, Lisette Johnston\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3097286.3097305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper seeks to address the tension between privacy and sharing culture. Despite many claims that privacy is dead, research suggests that there is a shift from privacy as an individualized right based around control to something more social, more embedded, more public and more networked. Drawing from seven media diaries, interviews with those diarists and a survey (N=270) of London, UK residents aged 18-36, we aim for a better picture of privacy and sharing culture as lived experiences. Based on this evidence, we identify a number of themes. First, privacy matters. Although respondents identify sharing as embedded and networked, their experiences and understanding of privacy remains more traditional. For most, privacy is an individualized right focused on control. In addition, we find several themes emerging from the data -- social privacy is more important than institutional privacy; younger respondents talk about \\\"public friends\\\" and \\\"private sharing\\\" to justify and explain their sharing practices; respondents also commonly talk about a 'persona' on social media profiles; and finally, respondents are increasingly depersonalizing what they share on social media. All of these themes point to ways that respondents exercise sharing strategies in part to protect their privacy, but also for managing the sharing expectations of their social media use and sharing culture more broadly.\",\"PeriodicalId\":130378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Social Media & Society\",\"volume\":\"101 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Social Media & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3097286.3097305\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Social Media & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3097286.3097305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文试图解决隐私和共享文化之间的紧张关系。尽管许多人声称隐私已经消亡,但研究表明,隐私已经从一种基于控制的个性化权利转变为一种更社会化、更根深蒂固、更公开、更网络化的权利。我们从7个媒体日记、对这些日记作者的采访和对伦敦18-36岁的英国居民的一项调查(N=270)中得出结论,我们的目标是更好地了解隐私和分享文化作为生活经验。基于这些证据,我们确定了一些主题。首先,隐私很重要。尽管受访者认为共享是嵌入式和网络化的,但他们对隐私的体验和理解仍然比较传统。对大多数人来说,隐私是一种注重控制的个性化权利。此外,我们从数据中发现了几个主题——社交隐私比机构隐私更重要;年轻的受访者用“公众好友”和“私人分享”来为他们的分享行为辩护和解释;受访者还经常谈到社交媒体资料上的“角色”;最后,受访者越来越多地将他们在社交媒体上分享的内容去个人化。所有这些主题都指向了受访者运用分享策略的方式,一方面是为了保护他们的隐私,另一方面是为了管理他们对社交媒体使用的分享期望,以及更广泛的分享文化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Public Friends and Private Sharing: Understanding Shifting Privacies in Sharing Culture
This paper seeks to address the tension between privacy and sharing culture. Despite many claims that privacy is dead, research suggests that there is a shift from privacy as an individualized right based around control to something more social, more embedded, more public and more networked. Drawing from seven media diaries, interviews with those diarists and a survey (N=270) of London, UK residents aged 18-36, we aim for a better picture of privacy and sharing culture as lived experiences. Based on this evidence, we identify a number of themes. First, privacy matters. Although respondents identify sharing as embedded and networked, their experiences and understanding of privacy remains more traditional. For most, privacy is an individualized right focused on control. In addition, we find several themes emerging from the data -- social privacy is more important than institutional privacy; younger respondents talk about "public friends" and "private sharing" to justify and explain their sharing practices; respondents also commonly talk about a 'persona' on social media profiles; and finally, respondents are increasingly depersonalizing what they share on social media. All of these themes point to ways that respondents exercise sharing strategies in part to protect their privacy, but also for managing the sharing expectations of their social media use and sharing culture more broadly.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Glyphexts (Glyphs + Text = Effect) as Information Divide: Screen Reader Impact on Interpreting Sentimentality in Online Social Media Review Posts How Celebrities Feed Tweeples with Personal and Promotional Tweets: Celebrity Twitter Use and Audience Engagement Strategic Temporality on Social Media During the General Election of the 2016 U.S. Presidential Campaign Introduction to the 2017 International Conference on Social Media and Society The Presentation of Selfie in Everyday Life: Considering the Relationship Between Social Media Design and User in the Online Actions and Interactions of Young People
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1