当代俄罗斯欧洲主义作为一种“边缘”政治传统和一种史学上的宏大叙事

M. Kirchanov
{"title":"当代俄罗斯欧洲主义作为一种“边缘”政治传统和一种史学上的宏大叙事","authors":"M. Kirchanov","doi":"10.35634/2587-9030-2022-6-2-208-216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author analyses the development features of Europeanism as an invented political tradition and historiographic grand narrative in Russian intellectual history. It is assumed that modern Russian Europeanism is related to the cultural traditions of Russian Westernisation genetically, as well as the reforms of the 1990s, when the political elites of Russia had pro-Western sympathies. The author perceives Europeanism as a number of heterogeneous intellectual phenomena. The author believes that historical and literary academic studies became the main form of the history and functioning of Russian Europeanism in the 2000s and 2010s. It is assumed that the Russian intellectual communities of historians, philologists and literary critics exist in a state of institutionalised dependence on the Western European model of humanitarian knowledge. The article shows that Russian Europeanism has two forms: firstly, the desire of Russian intellectuals to write the history of Russia in the European system of coordinates, “imagining” and “inventing” it as a European one; secondly, the refusal of some of them to analyse Russian problems as ideologically and politically motivated a priori. The author analyses attempts to Europeanise the Russian historical process as invented traditions in contexts of alternative historiographic interpretations. It is assumed that the European perception of the historical process became one of the historiographic grand narratives. The author believes that Russian Europeanism had significant cultural and intellectual potential, but it was unable to actualize its adaptive potential in competition with alternative ideological trends, including various versions of the left (communist) and right (nationalist) ideologies. Therefore, contemporary Russian Europeanism is not institutionalised and does not have a formal organisational structure. The author believes that the national intellectual communities, unlike the Russian ones, have not lost interest in the European idea yet, which guarantee the further development of Europeanism in Russia, but in substantially different forms.","PeriodicalId":263017,"journal":{"name":"Вестник Удмуртского университета. Социология. Политология. Международные отношения","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CONTEMPORARY RUSSIAN EUROPEANISM AS A \\\"MARGINAL\\\" POLITICAL TRADITION AND A HISTORIOGRAPHIC GRAND NARRATIVE\",\"authors\":\"M. Kirchanov\",\"doi\":\"10.35634/2587-9030-2022-6-2-208-216\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The author analyses the development features of Europeanism as an invented political tradition and historiographic grand narrative in Russian intellectual history. It is assumed that modern Russian Europeanism is related to the cultural traditions of Russian Westernisation genetically, as well as the reforms of the 1990s, when the political elites of Russia had pro-Western sympathies. The author perceives Europeanism as a number of heterogeneous intellectual phenomena. The author believes that historical and literary academic studies became the main form of the history and functioning of Russian Europeanism in the 2000s and 2010s. It is assumed that the Russian intellectual communities of historians, philologists and literary critics exist in a state of institutionalised dependence on the Western European model of humanitarian knowledge. The article shows that Russian Europeanism has two forms: firstly, the desire of Russian intellectuals to write the history of Russia in the European system of coordinates, “imagining” and “inventing” it as a European one; secondly, the refusal of some of them to analyse Russian problems as ideologically and politically motivated a priori. The author analyses attempts to Europeanise the Russian historical process as invented traditions in contexts of alternative historiographic interpretations. It is assumed that the European perception of the historical process became one of the historiographic grand narratives. The author believes that Russian Europeanism had significant cultural and intellectual potential, but it was unable to actualize its adaptive potential in competition with alternative ideological trends, including various versions of the left (communist) and right (nationalist) ideologies. Therefore, contemporary Russian Europeanism is not institutionalised and does not have a formal organisational structure. The author believes that the national intellectual communities, unlike the Russian ones, have not lost interest in the European idea yet, which guarantee the further development of Europeanism in Russia, but in substantially different forms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":263017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Вестник Удмуртского университета. Социология. Политология. Международные отношения\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Вестник Удмуртского университета. Социология. Политология. Международные отношения\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35634/2587-9030-2022-6-2-208-216\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Вестник Удмуртского университета. Социология. Политология. Международные отношения","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35634/2587-9030-2022-6-2-208-216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作者分析了欧洲主义作为一种虚构的政治传统和历史大叙事在俄罗斯思想史上的发展特点。据推测,现代俄罗斯的欧洲主义与俄罗斯西方化的文化传统以及20世纪90年代的改革有关,当时俄罗斯的政治精英具有亲西方的同情。作者认为欧洲主义是一系列异质的智力现象。作者认为,在2000年代和2010年代,历史和文学学术研究成为俄罗斯欧洲主义历史和运作的主要形式。人们认为,由历史学家、语言学家和文学评论家组成的俄罗斯知识界存在于一种制度化的依赖于西欧人道主义知识模式的状态中。文章认为,俄罗斯的欧洲主义有两种表现形式:一是俄罗斯知识分子希望在欧洲坐标系中书写俄罗斯历史,“想象”和“发明”它作为欧洲坐标系;其次,他们中的一些人拒绝从意识形态和政治动机出发来分析俄罗斯的问题。作者分析了在不同的史学解释背景下,将俄罗斯历史过程欧洲化为虚构的传统的企图。欧洲人对历史进程的看法被认为是一种宏大的史学叙事。作者认为,俄罗斯欧洲主义具有巨大的文化和智力潜力,但在与各种形式的左(共产主义)和右(民族主义)意识形态的竞争中,它无法实现其适应潜力。因此,当代俄罗斯欧洲主义没有制度化,也没有正式的组织结构。作者认为,与俄罗斯不同的是,各民族的知识界还没有丧失对欧洲思想的兴趣,这保证了欧洲主义在俄罗斯的进一步发展,但形式上有很大的不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CONTEMPORARY RUSSIAN EUROPEANISM AS A "MARGINAL" POLITICAL TRADITION AND A HISTORIOGRAPHIC GRAND NARRATIVE
The author analyses the development features of Europeanism as an invented political tradition and historiographic grand narrative in Russian intellectual history. It is assumed that modern Russian Europeanism is related to the cultural traditions of Russian Westernisation genetically, as well as the reforms of the 1990s, when the political elites of Russia had pro-Western sympathies. The author perceives Europeanism as a number of heterogeneous intellectual phenomena. The author believes that historical and literary academic studies became the main form of the history and functioning of Russian Europeanism in the 2000s and 2010s. It is assumed that the Russian intellectual communities of historians, philologists and literary critics exist in a state of institutionalised dependence on the Western European model of humanitarian knowledge. The article shows that Russian Europeanism has two forms: firstly, the desire of Russian intellectuals to write the history of Russia in the European system of coordinates, “imagining” and “inventing” it as a European one; secondly, the refusal of some of them to analyse Russian problems as ideologically and politically motivated a priori. The author analyses attempts to Europeanise the Russian historical process as invented traditions in contexts of alternative historiographic interpretations. It is assumed that the European perception of the historical process became one of the historiographic grand narratives. The author believes that Russian Europeanism had significant cultural and intellectual potential, but it was unable to actualize its adaptive potential in competition with alternative ideological trends, including various versions of the left (communist) and right (nationalist) ideologies. Therefore, contemporary Russian Europeanism is not institutionalised and does not have a formal organisational structure. The author believes that the national intellectual communities, unlike the Russian ones, have not lost interest in the European idea yet, which guarantee the further development of Europeanism in Russia, but in substantially different forms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
FEATURES OF LATIN AMERICAN SOCIALISM ON THE EXAMPLE OF CHILE, BOLIVIA, VENEZUELA AND NICARAGUA SOCIAL ASPECTS OF MANAGING RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT OF NEURAL NETWORKS THE HISTORY OF ISLAM IN THE POLITICS OF MEMORY IN INDONESIA (mid-2010s to early 2020s) "MYSTERIOUS ALBION": NEGOTIATION BEHAVIOR PATTERN OF THE BRITISH SPECIFICS OF THE RUSSIAN COGNITARIATE OF GENERATION Z
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1