泰国大麻合法化中大麻话语的建构与启示:英语传统媒体与新媒体的比较研究

Udomsak Sirita
{"title":"泰国大麻合法化中大麻话语的建构与启示:英语传统媒体与新媒体的比较研究","authors":"Udomsak Sirita","doi":"10.55766/aumo7803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although news reports about cannabis legalization in Thailand were constructed on medical cannabis, several discourses were found in cannabis legalization in traditional and new media. Consequently, the purpose of this research is to examine how English-language texts were linguistically constructed to support or oppose Thailand’s cannabis legalization found in newspaper reports and posts on social media. This study is a qualitative research employing Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) as the main theoretical framework in which texts were analyzed by using a linguistic analysis tool. The finding suggests that cannabis is constructed as an economic crop, a national property protected for only Thais, a patient benefit, traditional medicine, and a normal thing in pro-movement found in both Bangkok Post Newspaper and Highland Network Page which discourses are related to economic, social, cultural, political, and scientific dimensions. Furthermore, cannabis represented as traditional medicine is an outstanding discourse found in Thai context, which is rarely found in previous studies. However, Highland Network Page tends to provide the only positive side of cannabis and cannabis legalization. Although the negative implications of cannabis were mostly found in Bangkok Post, anti-movement contents were not explicitly reported. The construction of cannabis discourse also reveals the movement of social actors such as patients and activists campaigning against hegemony, farmers in the unfair economic system, healthcare system problems, and stigmatized cannabis users in Thailand.","PeriodicalId":145995,"journal":{"name":"Suranaree Journal of Social Science","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Construction and Implications of Cannabis Discourse in Thailand’s Cannabis Legalization: A Comparative Study of English-language Traditional and New Media\",\"authors\":\"Udomsak Sirita\",\"doi\":\"10.55766/aumo7803\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although news reports about cannabis legalization in Thailand were constructed on medical cannabis, several discourses were found in cannabis legalization in traditional and new media. Consequently, the purpose of this research is to examine how English-language texts were linguistically constructed to support or oppose Thailand’s cannabis legalization found in newspaper reports and posts on social media. This study is a qualitative research employing Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) as the main theoretical framework in which texts were analyzed by using a linguistic analysis tool. The finding suggests that cannabis is constructed as an economic crop, a national property protected for only Thais, a patient benefit, traditional medicine, and a normal thing in pro-movement found in both Bangkok Post Newspaper and Highland Network Page which discourses are related to economic, social, cultural, political, and scientific dimensions. Furthermore, cannabis represented as traditional medicine is an outstanding discourse found in Thai context, which is rarely found in previous studies. However, Highland Network Page tends to provide the only positive side of cannabis and cannabis legalization. Although the negative implications of cannabis were mostly found in Bangkok Post, anti-movement contents were not explicitly reported. The construction of cannabis discourse also reveals the movement of social actors such as patients and activists campaigning against hegemony, farmers in the unfair economic system, healthcare system problems, and stigmatized cannabis users in Thailand.\",\"PeriodicalId\":145995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Suranaree Journal of Social Science\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Suranaree Journal of Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55766/aumo7803\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Suranaree Journal of Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55766/aumo7803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

虽然泰国大麻合法化的新闻报道以医用大麻为基础,但在传统媒体和新媒体中,大麻合法化也存在一些话语。因此,本研究的目的是研究在报纸报道和社交媒体上发现的英语文本是如何在语言上构建以支持或反对泰国大麻合法化的。本研究是以批评性话语分析为主要理论框架,运用语言分析工具对语篇进行分析的定性研究。研究结果显示,大麻被建构为一种经济作物,一种仅为泰国人所保护的国家财产,一种病患利益,一种传统药物,以及在曼谷邮报和Highland Network Page的支持运动中,一种与经济、社会、文化、政治和科学维度相关的正常事物。此外,大麻作为传统药物的代表是在泰国背景下发现的杰出话语,这在以前的研究中很少发现。然而,高地网络页面倾向于提供大麻和大麻合法化的唯一积极方面。虽然《曼谷邮报》主要报道大麻的负面影响,但没有明确报道反运动内容。大麻话语的建构也揭示了社会行动者的运动,如反对霸权的患者和活动家,不公平经济制度中的农民,医疗保健系统问题,以及泰国大麻使用者的耻辱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Construction and Implications of Cannabis Discourse in Thailand’s Cannabis Legalization: A Comparative Study of English-language Traditional and New Media
Although news reports about cannabis legalization in Thailand were constructed on medical cannabis, several discourses were found in cannabis legalization in traditional and new media. Consequently, the purpose of this research is to examine how English-language texts were linguistically constructed to support or oppose Thailand’s cannabis legalization found in newspaper reports and posts on social media. This study is a qualitative research employing Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) as the main theoretical framework in which texts were analyzed by using a linguistic analysis tool. The finding suggests that cannabis is constructed as an economic crop, a national property protected for only Thais, a patient benefit, traditional medicine, and a normal thing in pro-movement found in both Bangkok Post Newspaper and Highland Network Page which discourses are related to economic, social, cultural, political, and scientific dimensions. Furthermore, cannabis represented as traditional medicine is an outstanding discourse found in Thai context, which is rarely found in previous studies. However, Highland Network Page tends to provide the only positive side of cannabis and cannabis legalization. Although the negative implications of cannabis were mostly found in Bangkok Post, anti-movement contents were not explicitly reported. The construction of cannabis discourse also reveals the movement of social actors such as patients and activists campaigning against hegemony, farmers in the unfair economic system, healthcare system problems, and stigmatized cannabis users in Thailand.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nietzsche as Metaphysician Structural Equation Modeling of Food Safety Standard in the Cassava Industry in Thailand Implementing a Portfolio-based Learner Autonomy Development Model in an EFL Writing Course Causal Factors Influencing Development of Organizational Survival for Companies Listed in Thailand Intercultural Language Education: Supportive Factors and Constraints on EFL Learners’ Intercultural Communicative Competence Development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1