学期单例臀位介绍:新西兰背景下应用的证据和国际指南的审查

L. Dixon, E. Gray, C. Macdonald, J. Gullam, R. Powell
{"title":"学期单例臀位介绍:新西兰背景下应用的证据和国际指南的审查","authors":"L. Dixon, E. Gray, C. Macdonald, J. Gullam, R. Powell","doi":"10.12784/NZCOMJNL54.2018.1.5-14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A Corresponding Author: practice@ nzcom.org.nz B New Zealand College of Midwives C Lead Maternity Carer, Christchurch D Christchurch Womens's Hospital, New Zealand E University of Canterbury, New Zealand Background: Over the last few decades the management of a breech baby at term has been immersed in controversy. It is important that New Zealand midwives and doctors have sufficient understanding of the evidence to be able to effectively counsel women to make an informed decision when a baby presents in a breech position at term. Aims: To review the evidence and international guidance related to mode of birth for singleton breech presentation at term, identify the current evidence and gaps in knowledge and highlight how the evidence can be used to support women within the New Zealand context of maternity care. Method: We searched Scopus, PubMed and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for peer reviewed publications about term breech presentation. The search terms used were \"breech presentation\" and \"term\". Limiters were set for the time period between 2000 and 2015, English language, human pregnancies, and peer reviewed journals. Findings: We found 456 published papers covering breech presentation related to clinical outcomes, professional commentaries, professional guidelines and the woman’s perspectives. We identified and retrieved 37 papers as relevant to our search criteria. We report specifically on the papers that provided professional commentary (detailed critique of the evidence), clinical studies, systematic reviews, meta-analyses and professional guidelines. Following the publication of the Term Breech Trial there was a change in practice to that of recommending planned caesarean section for term breech presentation. Subsequent critiques and reviews have identified concerns with the study which undermine its reliability. Further retrospective/ prospective studies, a systematic review and a meta-analysis have demonstrated equivocal results and suggest that perinatal mortality during vaginal breech births can be reduced when strict criteria are applied and an experienced clinician is involved. Many professional guidelines now advise that offering women the option of a vaginal breech birth is reasonable. Conclusion: New Zealand midwives and doctors need to be in a position to inform women with breech presenting babies about factors that support the safety of vaginal breech birth, as well as about the benefits and potential harms of both caesarean section and vaginal breech birth, to support their decision making.","PeriodicalId":137118,"journal":{"name":"New Zealand College of Midwives Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Singleton breech presentation at term: Review of the evidence and international guidelines for application to the New Zealand context\",\"authors\":\"L. Dixon, E. Gray, C. Macdonald, J. Gullam, R. Powell\",\"doi\":\"10.12784/NZCOMJNL54.2018.1.5-14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A Corresponding Author: practice@ nzcom.org.nz B New Zealand College of Midwives C Lead Maternity Carer, Christchurch D Christchurch Womens's Hospital, New Zealand E University of Canterbury, New Zealand Background: Over the last few decades the management of a breech baby at term has been immersed in controversy. It is important that New Zealand midwives and doctors have sufficient understanding of the evidence to be able to effectively counsel women to make an informed decision when a baby presents in a breech position at term. Aims: To review the evidence and international guidance related to mode of birth for singleton breech presentation at term, identify the current evidence and gaps in knowledge and highlight how the evidence can be used to support women within the New Zealand context of maternity care. Method: We searched Scopus, PubMed and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for peer reviewed publications about term breech presentation. The search terms used were \\\"breech presentation\\\" and \\\"term\\\". Limiters were set for the time period between 2000 and 2015, English language, human pregnancies, and peer reviewed journals. Findings: We found 456 published papers covering breech presentation related to clinical outcomes, professional commentaries, professional guidelines and the woman’s perspectives. We identified and retrieved 37 papers as relevant to our search criteria. We report specifically on the papers that provided professional commentary (detailed critique of the evidence), clinical studies, systematic reviews, meta-analyses and professional guidelines. Following the publication of the Term Breech Trial there was a change in practice to that of recommending planned caesarean section for term breech presentation. Subsequent critiques and reviews have identified concerns with the study which undermine its reliability. Further retrospective/ prospective studies, a systematic review and a meta-analysis have demonstrated equivocal results and suggest that perinatal mortality during vaginal breech births can be reduced when strict criteria are applied and an experienced clinician is involved. Many professional guidelines now advise that offering women the option of a vaginal breech birth is reasonable. Conclusion: New Zealand midwives and doctors need to be in a position to inform women with breech presenting babies about factors that support the safety of vaginal breech birth, as well as about the benefits and potential harms of both caesarean section and vaginal breech birth, to support their decision making.\",\"PeriodicalId\":137118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Zealand College of Midwives Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Zealand College of Midwives Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12784/NZCOMJNL54.2018.1.5-14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Zealand College of Midwives Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12784/NZCOMJNL54.2018.1.5-14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

A通讯作者:B新西兰助产士学院C首席产科护理,基督城D基督城妇女医院,新西兰坎特伯雷大学,新西兰背景:在过去的几十年里,臀位婴儿的管理一直沉浸在争议中。重要的是,新西兰的助产士和医生对证据有足够的了解,能够有效地建议妇女在婴儿在足月以臀位出现时做出明智的决定。目的:回顾与足月单胎臀位分娩方式相关的证据和国际指南,确定当前的证据和知识差距,并强调如何在新西兰的产妇护理背景下使用证据来支持妇女。方法:检索Scopus、PubMed和Cochrane系统评价数据库,检索同行评议的论文。使用的搜索词是“胯部展示”和“术语”。限定时间为2000年至2015年,英语、人类怀孕和同行评议期刊。结果:我们找到了456篇已发表的论文,涵盖了与临床结果、专业评论、专业指南和女性观点相关的臀位表现。我们确定并检索了37篇与我们的检索标准相关的论文。我们专门报道那些提供专业评论(对证据的详细评论)、临床研究、系统综述、荟萃分析和专业指南的论文。在《臀位试验》发表之后,在实践中出现了一种变化,即推荐有计划的剖宫产来治疗臀位。随后的批评和评论已经确定了对该研究的担忧,这些担忧削弱了其可靠性。进一步的回顾性/前瞻性研究、系统综述和荟萃分析显示了模棱两可的结果,并表明如果采用严格的标准和有经验的临床医生参与,阴道臀位分娩的围产期死亡率可以降低。许多专业指南现在建议,为女性提供阴道分娩的选择是合理的。结论:新西兰的助产士和医生需要告知臀位孕妇阴道臀位分娩的安全因素,以及剖腹产和阴道臀位分娩的好处和潜在危害,以支持她们的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Singleton breech presentation at term: Review of the evidence and international guidelines for application to the New Zealand context
A Corresponding Author: practice@ nzcom.org.nz B New Zealand College of Midwives C Lead Maternity Carer, Christchurch D Christchurch Womens's Hospital, New Zealand E University of Canterbury, New Zealand Background: Over the last few decades the management of a breech baby at term has been immersed in controversy. It is important that New Zealand midwives and doctors have sufficient understanding of the evidence to be able to effectively counsel women to make an informed decision when a baby presents in a breech position at term. Aims: To review the evidence and international guidance related to mode of birth for singleton breech presentation at term, identify the current evidence and gaps in knowledge and highlight how the evidence can be used to support women within the New Zealand context of maternity care. Method: We searched Scopus, PubMed and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for peer reviewed publications about term breech presentation. The search terms used were "breech presentation" and "term". Limiters were set for the time period between 2000 and 2015, English language, human pregnancies, and peer reviewed journals. Findings: We found 456 published papers covering breech presentation related to clinical outcomes, professional commentaries, professional guidelines and the woman’s perspectives. We identified and retrieved 37 papers as relevant to our search criteria. We report specifically on the papers that provided professional commentary (detailed critique of the evidence), clinical studies, systematic reviews, meta-analyses and professional guidelines. Following the publication of the Term Breech Trial there was a change in practice to that of recommending planned caesarean section for term breech presentation. Subsequent critiques and reviews have identified concerns with the study which undermine its reliability. Further retrospective/ prospective studies, a systematic review and a meta-analysis have demonstrated equivocal results and suggest that perinatal mortality during vaginal breech births can be reduced when strict criteria are applied and an experienced clinician is involved. Many professional guidelines now advise that offering women the option of a vaginal breech birth is reasonable. Conclusion: New Zealand midwives and doctors need to be in a position to inform women with breech presenting babies about factors that support the safety of vaginal breech birth, as well as about the benefits and potential harms of both caesarean section and vaginal breech birth, to support their decision making.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The lactation and chestfeeding/breastfeeding information, care and support needs of trans and non-binary parents: An integrative literature review A vision of decolonisation: Midwifery mentoring from the perspective of Māori mentors Midwives' perceptions of enablers and barriers to pertussis and influenza vaccination in pregnancy and information sharing Timing of cord clamping: An observational study of cord clamping practice in a maternity hospital in Aotearoa New Zealand Editorial: "Turn left at the large flax." How times have changed
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1