估计COVID-19危重患者分流分数在确定菲律宾肺中心高流量鼻插管结果中的效用,一项试点研究。

M. R. Gabitan, S. Ganangan
{"title":"估计COVID-19危重患者分流分数在确定菲律宾肺中心高流量鼻插管结果中的效用,一项试点研究。","authors":"M. R. Gabitan, S. Ganangan","doi":"10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2022.205.1_MeetingAbstracts.A5627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) enabled us to treat Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) successfully on subsets of patients with COVID 19 without requiring invasive ventilatory support and with low mortality. Cautious use of HFNC is required to closely monitor the response in those patients with ARDS who develop clinical signs of respiratory failure. Currently the use of HFNC in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure is not well established due to conflicting studies. Several guidelines did not specify clear recommendations who is indicated and who will benefit on HFNC. Therefore the potential use of HFNC to provide an fi02 of up to 100% at shunt fraction of 0.1-0.3 may provide a significant increase in Pa02/fio2 ratio to correct the hypoxemia brought by ARDS but theoretically unclear with shunt fraction > 0.4. Objectives: This study investigated the initial shunt fraction as a parameter to determine if HFNC will benefit a specific group of patients to predict who will benefit from HFNC, prevent delayed intubations and consequently conserve resources. Methods: This was a retrospective, cohort study. Total of 205 Covid19 critical patients initially on HFNC admitted from July 1, 2020 to July 31, 2021 were included. Results: Forty-seven patients (22.9%) showed improved oxygenation and were successfully withdrawn from HFNC. In the binary logistic regression analysis, factors affecting mortality showed that age was the only variable predictive of in-hospital all-cause mortality. In the factors affecting intubation, logistic regression revealed greater shunt fraction would increase the odds of being intubated. Patients who have 30-40% shunt fraction had 3.8 times higher odds of being intubated and having a shunt fraction of >40% had 3.5 times the odds of being intubated in comparison with shunt fraction of <30%. Conclusions: HFNC has low success rate in covid19 critical patients but significantly showed benefit in those with shunt fraction <30%. Additionally, this study was not able to show the benefit of HFNC in terms of mortality and length of hospital stay. Shunt fraction is still worthwhile to use as a gauge but should be combined with clinical judgment and/or in conjunction with other parameters.","PeriodicalId":289883,"journal":{"name":"02.01 - Acute critical care","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Utility of Estimating the Shunt Fraction of Critical Patients with COVID-19 in determining the outcome of High Flow Nasal Cannula at Lung Center of the Philippines, a pilot study.\",\"authors\":\"M. R. Gabitan, S. Ganangan\",\"doi\":\"10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2022.205.1_MeetingAbstracts.A5627\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) enabled us to treat Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) successfully on subsets of patients with COVID 19 without requiring invasive ventilatory support and with low mortality. Cautious use of HFNC is required to closely monitor the response in those patients with ARDS who develop clinical signs of respiratory failure. Currently the use of HFNC in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure is not well established due to conflicting studies. Several guidelines did not specify clear recommendations who is indicated and who will benefit on HFNC. Therefore the potential use of HFNC to provide an fi02 of up to 100% at shunt fraction of 0.1-0.3 may provide a significant increase in Pa02/fio2 ratio to correct the hypoxemia brought by ARDS but theoretically unclear with shunt fraction > 0.4. Objectives: This study investigated the initial shunt fraction as a parameter to determine if HFNC will benefit a specific group of patients to predict who will benefit from HFNC, prevent delayed intubations and consequently conserve resources. Methods: This was a retrospective, cohort study. Total of 205 Covid19 critical patients initially on HFNC admitted from July 1, 2020 to July 31, 2021 were included. Results: Forty-seven patients (22.9%) showed improved oxygenation and were successfully withdrawn from HFNC. In the binary logistic regression analysis, factors affecting mortality showed that age was the only variable predictive of in-hospital all-cause mortality. In the factors affecting intubation, logistic regression revealed greater shunt fraction would increase the odds of being intubated. Patients who have 30-40% shunt fraction had 3.8 times higher odds of being intubated and having a shunt fraction of >40% had 3.5 times the odds of being intubated in comparison with shunt fraction of <30%. Conclusions: HFNC has low success rate in covid19 critical patients but significantly showed benefit in those with shunt fraction <30%. Additionally, this study was not able to show the benefit of HFNC in terms of mortality and length of hospital stay. Shunt fraction is still worthwhile to use as a gauge but should be combined with clinical judgment and/or in conjunction with other parameters.\",\"PeriodicalId\":289883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"02.01 - Acute critical care\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"02.01 - Acute critical care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2022.205.1_MeetingAbstracts.A5627\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"02.01 - Acute critical care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2022.205.1_MeetingAbstracts.A5627","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高流量鼻插管(HFNC)使我们能够在不需要有创通气支持和低死亡率的情况下成功治疗COVID - 19患者亚群的急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)。需要谨慎使用HFNC,密切监测出现呼吸衰竭临床症状的ARDS患者的反应。目前,由于相互矛盾的研究,HFNC在急性低氧性呼吸衰竭中的应用尚未得到很好的确立。一些指南没有明确建议谁适用HFNC,谁将受益。因此,在分流分数为0.1-0.3时,使用HFNC提供高达100%的fi02可能会显著增加Pa02/fio2比率,以纠正ARDS带来的低氧血症,但在分流分数> 0.4时,理论上不清楚。目的:本研究将初始分流分数作为一个参数来确定HFNC是否对特定患者组有益,以预测谁将从HFNC中受益,防止延迟插管,从而节省资源。方法:回顾性队列研究。纳入2020年7月1日至2021年7月31日收治的新冠肺炎危重患者205例。结果:47例(22.9%)患者氧合改善,成功退出HFNC。在二元logistic回归分析中,影响死亡率的因素显示,年龄是院内全因死亡率的唯一预测变量。在影响插管的因素中,逻辑回归显示分流分数越大,插管的几率越大。分流分数为30-40%的患者插管的几率是分流分数<30%的患者的3.8倍,分流分数>40%的患者插管的几率是分流分数<30%的3.5倍。结论:HFNC治疗新冠肺炎危重患者的成功率较低,但分流率<30%的患者疗效显著。此外,本研究未能显示HFNC在死亡率和住院时间方面的益处。分流分数仍有价值,但应与临床判断和/或其他参数结合使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Utility of Estimating the Shunt Fraction of Critical Patients with COVID-19 in determining the outcome of High Flow Nasal Cannula at Lung Center of the Philippines, a pilot study.
Introduction: High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) enabled us to treat Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) successfully on subsets of patients with COVID 19 without requiring invasive ventilatory support and with low mortality. Cautious use of HFNC is required to closely monitor the response in those patients with ARDS who develop clinical signs of respiratory failure. Currently the use of HFNC in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure is not well established due to conflicting studies. Several guidelines did not specify clear recommendations who is indicated and who will benefit on HFNC. Therefore the potential use of HFNC to provide an fi02 of up to 100% at shunt fraction of 0.1-0.3 may provide a significant increase in Pa02/fio2 ratio to correct the hypoxemia brought by ARDS but theoretically unclear with shunt fraction > 0.4. Objectives: This study investigated the initial shunt fraction as a parameter to determine if HFNC will benefit a specific group of patients to predict who will benefit from HFNC, prevent delayed intubations and consequently conserve resources. Methods: This was a retrospective, cohort study. Total of 205 Covid19 critical patients initially on HFNC admitted from July 1, 2020 to July 31, 2021 were included. Results: Forty-seven patients (22.9%) showed improved oxygenation and were successfully withdrawn from HFNC. In the binary logistic regression analysis, factors affecting mortality showed that age was the only variable predictive of in-hospital all-cause mortality. In the factors affecting intubation, logistic regression revealed greater shunt fraction would increase the odds of being intubated. Patients who have 30-40% shunt fraction had 3.8 times higher odds of being intubated and having a shunt fraction of >40% had 3.5 times the odds of being intubated in comparison with shunt fraction of <30%. Conclusions: HFNC has low success rate in covid19 critical patients but significantly showed benefit in those with shunt fraction <30%. Additionally, this study was not able to show the benefit of HFNC in terms of mortality and length of hospital stay. Shunt fraction is still worthwhile to use as a gauge but should be combined with clinical judgment and/or in conjunction with other parameters.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
COVID-19 pneumonia hospitalizations in different phases of the pandemic in the United States: patient characteristics and clinical outcomes Early prediction of mortality of septic patients visiting emergency room using machine learning Air leak in Covid 19: experience from a DGH in the UK Risk factors for mortality in COPD patients with COVID-19 admitted to Intensive Care Unit The diagnosis of spontaneous secondary tension pneumothorax following apparentrecovery from COVID-19 pneumonitis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1