{"title":"ht80焊接接头疲劳失效位置的变化","authors":"Masaki Watanabe, Y. Yoshino, I. Watanabe, H. Aoki","doi":"10.2534/JJASNAOE1968.1970.128_A359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We obtained the following results from fatigue test on the welded joints of HT 80 with the reinforcements removed using the modified Schenck's test pieces.(1) The endurance limits of the welded joints were slightly lower than that of the base metal.(2) Most welded joints failed at the bonded zone or the softened zone in H. A. Z. In the case of the specimens failed at the bonded zone, the fatigue cracks started in the coarse grain zone.(3) The welded joints failed almost at the softened zone when the applied stress was comparatively high and failed slightly more at the bonded zone than the softened zone when the applied stress was near the endurance limit.(4) Considering the result (3), we had investigated the endurance limit (σ) from two points hardness (H) and grain diameter (D) and proposed the following formula, σ=a1H1/√D+b11/√D+a2H+b2, where a1, b1, a2, b2 are the constant values without concerning the material, and we proposed the following values : a1=0.0017, b1=0.54, a2=0.11, b2=3.5.(5) From one more experiment on the grain size dependence of the fatigue strength, we obtained the fact that the effect of the grain size on the fatigue strength decreases with increase of the applied stress.(6) The equation above mentioned shows the endurance limit, but when the applied stress is comparatively higher than the endurance limit, the values 'a1' and 'b1' must be smaller than 0.0017 and 0.54 judging from the result (5). In this case we can see that the fatigue strength of bonded zone is higher than that of the softened zone.","PeriodicalId":273687,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of the Japan Welding Society","volume":"61 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1970-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variation of the Positions where the Welded Joints of HT 80 failed in the Fatigue Test\",\"authors\":\"Masaki Watanabe, Y. Yoshino, I. Watanabe, H. Aoki\",\"doi\":\"10.2534/JJASNAOE1968.1970.128_A359\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We obtained the following results from fatigue test on the welded joints of HT 80 with the reinforcements removed using the modified Schenck's test pieces.(1) The endurance limits of the welded joints were slightly lower than that of the base metal.(2) Most welded joints failed at the bonded zone or the softened zone in H. A. Z. In the case of the specimens failed at the bonded zone, the fatigue cracks started in the coarse grain zone.(3) The welded joints failed almost at the softened zone when the applied stress was comparatively high and failed slightly more at the bonded zone than the softened zone when the applied stress was near the endurance limit.(4) Considering the result (3), we had investigated the endurance limit (σ) from two points hardness (H) and grain diameter (D) and proposed the following formula, σ=a1H1/√D+b11/√D+a2H+b2, where a1, b1, a2, b2 are the constant values without concerning the material, and we proposed the following values : a1=0.0017, b1=0.54, a2=0.11, b2=3.5.(5) From one more experiment on the grain size dependence of the fatigue strength, we obtained the fact that the effect of the grain size on the fatigue strength decreases with increase of the applied stress.(6) The equation above mentioned shows the endurance limit, but when the applied stress is comparatively higher than the endurance limit, the values 'a1' and 'b1' must be smaller than 0.0017 and 0.54 judging from the result (5). In this case we can see that the fatigue strength of bonded zone is higher than that of the softened zone.\",\"PeriodicalId\":273687,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transactions of the Japan Welding Society\",\"volume\":\"61 6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1970-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transactions of the Japan Welding Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2534/JJASNAOE1968.1970.128_A359\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of the Japan Welding Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2534/JJASNAOE1968.1970.128_A359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
采用改进的Schenck试件对去掉增强后的ht80焊接接头进行了疲劳试验,结果表明:(1)焊接接头的耐久极限略低于母材的耐久极限;(2)大部分焊接接头在粘结区或H. A. z的软化区失效,试样在粘结区失效;(4)结合(3)的结果,从硬度(H)和晶粒直径(D)两个角度对疲劳极限σ进行了研究,提出了σ=a1H1/√D+b11/√D+a2H+b2的计算公式,其中a1, b1, a2,B2是不考虑材料的常数,我们提出如下值:a1=0.0017, b1=0.54, a2=0.11, b2=3.5.(5)再对疲劳强度的晶粒尺寸依赖性进行一次试验,得到晶粒尺寸对疲劳强度的影响随外加应力的增大而减小。(6)上述式表示的是疲劳极限,但当外加应力相对大于疲劳极限时,从结果(5)可以看出,a1和b1必须分别小于0.0017和0.54,此时粘结区的疲劳强度高于软化区的疲劳强度。
Variation of the Positions where the Welded Joints of HT 80 failed in the Fatigue Test
We obtained the following results from fatigue test on the welded joints of HT 80 with the reinforcements removed using the modified Schenck's test pieces.(1) The endurance limits of the welded joints were slightly lower than that of the base metal.(2) Most welded joints failed at the bonded zone or the softened zone in H. A. Z. In the case of the specimens failed at the bonded zone, the fatigue cracks started in the coarse grain zone.(3) The welded joints failed almost at the softened zone when the applied stress was comparatively high and failed slightly more at the bonded zone than the softened zone when the applied stress was near the endurance limit.(4) Considering the result (3), we had investigated the endurance limit (σ) from two points hardness (H) and grain diameter (D) and proposed the following formula, σ=a1H1/√D+b11/√D+a2H+b2, where a1, b1, a2, b2 are the constant values without concerning the material, and we proposed the following values : a1=0.0017, b1=0.54, a2=0.11, b2=3.5.(5) From one more experiment on the grain size dependence of the fatigue strength, we obtained the fact that the effect of the grain size on the fatigue strength decreases with increase of the applied stress.(6) The equation above mentioned shows the endurance limit, but when the applied stress is comparatively higher than the endurance limit, the values 'a1' and 'b1' must be smaller than 0.0017 and 0.54 judging from the result (5). In this case we can see that the fatigue strength of bonded zone is higher than that of the softened zone.