利用分位数损耗将安全系数集成到容量预测模型中

Gabriela Molinar, J. Gundlach, W. Stork
{"title":"利用分位数损耗将安全系数集成到容量预测模型中","authors":"Gabriela Molinar, J. Gundlach, W. Stork","doi":"10.1109/ISGTLatinAmerica52371.2021.9543043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The safety and the life span of the electrical network have the highest priority. A safety factor for ampacity predictions is defined by several system operators to avoid overestimations. Applying this, they still have time to react without producing long-term damages of the line in case the forecast is higher than the actual current capacity. An example of a safety factor is the 2% overestimation rate. This article presents and compares two possible solutions to include a safety factor into ampacity forecasting systems. One is a simple bias, which is statistically calculated and then added as a constant to all predictions. The second approach can be applied to machine learning models, since it uses a quantile loss function for training, which has a predefined threshold of overestimations as a quantile. Both solutions are explained using a standard database for ampacity forecasting studies. At the end, the benefits of training based on a quantile loss function get clear, which opens a new experimentation field to get nearer to the requirements of system operators.","PeriodicalId":120262,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference - Latin America (ISGT Latin America)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating a Safety Factor into Ampacity Forecasting Models using Quantile Losses\",\"authors\":\"Gabriela Molinar, J. Gundlach, W. Stork\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISGTLatinAmerica52371.2021.9543043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The safety and the life span of the electrical network have the highest priority. A safety factor for ampacity predictions is defined by several system operators to avoid overestimations. Applying this, they still have time to react without producing long-term damages of the line in case the forecast is higher than the actual current capacity. An example of a safety factor is the 2% overestimation rate. This article presents and compares two possible solutions to include a safety factor into ampacity forecasting systems. One is a simple bias, which is statistically calculated and then added as a constant to all predictions. The second approach can be applied to machine learning models, since it uses a quantile loss function for training, which has a predefined threshold of overestimations as a quantile. Both solutions are explained using a standard database for ampacity forecasting studies. At the end, the benefits of training based on a quantile loss function get clear, which opens a new experimentation field to get nearer to the requirements of system operators.\",\"PeriodicalId\":120262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference - Latin America (ISGT Latin America)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference - Latin America (ISGT Latin America)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISGTLatinAmerica52371.2021.9543043\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference - Latin America (ISGT Latin America)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISGTLatinAmerica52371.2021.9543043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

电网的安全性和使用寿命是重中之重。电容量预测的安全系数由几个系统操作员定义,以避免高估。应用这一方法,在预测容量高于当前实际容量的情况下,他们仍有时间做出反应,而不会对线路造成长期损害。安全系数的一个例子是2%的高估率。本文提出并比较了将安全系数纳入容量预测系统的两种可能的解决方案。一种是简单的偏差,它是统计计算出来的,然后作为一个常数添加到所有预测中。第二种方法可以应用于机器学习模型,因为它使用分位数损失函数进行训练,该函数具有预定义的高估阈值作为分位数。使用容量预测研究的标准数据库解释了这两种解决方案。最后,明确了基于分位数损失函数的训练的好处,为更接近系统操作员的要求开辟了一个新的实验领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Integrating a Safety Factor into Ampacity Forecasting Models using Quantile Losses
The safety and the life span of the electrical network have the highest priority. A safety factor for ampacity predictions is defined by several system operators to avoid overestimations. Applying this, they still have time to react without producing long-term damages of the line in case the forecast is higher than the actual current capacity. An example of a safety factor is the 2% overestimation rate. This article presents and compares two possible solutions to include a safety factor into ampacity forecasting systems. One is a simple bias, which is statistically calculated and then added as a constant to all predictions. The second approach can be applied to machine learning models, since it uses a quantile loss function for training, which has a predefined threshold of overestimations as a quantile. Both solutions are explained using a standard database for ampacity forecasting studies. At the end, the benefits of training based on a quantile loss function get clear, which opens a new experimentation field to get nearer to the requirements of system operators.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Non-technical loss detection using data mining algorithms Asset Management Model of SCADA Infrastructure of Power Control Centers based on Indicators On Short Circuit of Grid-Forming Converters Controllers: A glance of the Dynamic Behaviour A Comprehensive Second-Life Review of Electric Vehicle Batteries - A Brazilian Study Case Distributed Generation for Resilience Enhancement on Power Distribution System Against Lahars Occurrence After a Volcanic Eruption
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1