Adeel Ahmed Bajjad , Seema Gupta , Soumitra Agarwal , Rakesh A. Pawar , Mansi U. Kothawade , Gul Singh
{"title":"人工智能在健康个体骨龄测定中的应用:综述。","authors":"Adeel Ahmed Bajjad , Seema Gupta , Soumitra Agarwal , Rakesh A. Pawar , Mansi U. Kothawade , Gul Singh","doi":"10.1016/j.ejwf.2023.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Bone age assessment, as an indicator of biological age, is widely used in orthodontics and pediatric endocrinology. Owing to significant subject variations in the manual method of assessment, artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), and deep learning (DL) play a significant role in this aspect. A scoping review was conducted to search the existing literature on the role of AI, ML, and DL in skeletal age or bone age assessment in healthy individuals.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from January 2012 to December 2022 using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses–Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. Grey literature was searched using Google Scholar and OpenGrey. Hand-searching of the articles in all the reputed orthodontic journals and the references of the included articles were also searched for relevant articles for the present scoping review.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Nineteen articles that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included. Ten studies used skeletal maturity indicators based on hand and wrist radiographs, two studies used magnetic resonance imaging and seven studies used cervical vertebrae maturity indicators based on lateral cephalograms to assess the skeletal age of the individuals. Most of these studies were published in non-orthodontic medical journals. BoneXpert automated software was the most commonly used software, followed by DL models, and ML models in the studies for assessment of bone age. The automated method was found to be as reliable as the manual method for assessment.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This scoping review validated the use of AI, ML, or DL in bone age assessment of individuals. A more uniform distribution of sufficient samples in different stages of maturation, use of three-dimensional inputs such as magnetic resonance imaging, and cone beam computed tomography is required for better training of the models to generalize the outputs for use in the target population.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":43456,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists","volume":"13 2","pages":"Pages 95-102"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of artificial intelligence in determination of bone age of the healthy individuals: A scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Adeel Ahmed Bajjad , Seema Gupta , Soumitra Agarwal , Rakesh A. Pawar , Mansi U. Kothawade , Gul Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejwf.2023.10.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Bone age assessment, as an indicator of biological age, is widely used in orthodontics and pediatric endocrinology. Owing to significant subject variations in the manual method of assessment, artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), and deep learning (DL) play a significant role in this aspect. A scoping review was conducted to search the existing literature on the role of AI, ML, and DL in skeletal age or bone age assessment in healthy individuals.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from January 2012 to December 2022 using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses–Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. Grey literature was searched using Google Scholar and OpenGrey. Hand-searching of the articles in all the reputed orthodontic journals and the references of the included articles were also searched for relevant articles for the present scoping review.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Nineteen articles that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included. Ten studies used skeletal maturity indicators based on hand and wrist radiographs, two studies used magnetic resonance imaging and seven studies used cervical vertebrae maturity indicators based on lateral cephalograms to assess the skeletal age of the individuals. Most of these studies were published in non-orthodontic medical journals. BoneXpert automated software was the most commonly used software, followed by DL models, and ML models in the studies for assessment of bone age. The automated method was found to be as reliable as the manual method for assessment.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This scoping review validated the use of AI, ML, or DL in bone age assessment of individuals. A more uniform distribution of sufficient samples in different stages of maturation, use of three-dimensional inputs such as magnetic resonance imaging, and cone beam computed tomography is required for better training of the models to generalize the outputs for use in the target population.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43456,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists\",\"volume\":\"13 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 95-102\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212443823000966\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212443823000966","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:骨龄评估作为生物年龄的一项指标,在口腔正畸学和儿科内分泌学中有着广泛的应用。由于人工评估方法的学科差异很大,人工智能(AI)、机器学习(ML)和深度学习(DL)在这方面发挥了重要作用。我们对AI、ML和DL在健康个体骨骼年龄或骨年龄评估中的作用的现有文献进行了范围综述。方法:检索2012年1月至2022年12月在PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science中使用系统评价和meta分析首选报告项目-范围评价扩展(PRISMA-ScR)和Joanna Briggs研究所指南进行的文献检索。使用谷歌Scholar和OpenGrey检索灰色文献。手工检索所有知名正畸期刊的文章,并检索纳入文章的参考文献,寻找与本次范围审查相关的文章。结果:纳入符合纳入标准的文献19篇。10项研究使用基于手部和手腕x线片的骨骼成熟度指标,2项研究使用磁共振成像,7项研究使用基于侧位脑电图的颈椎成熟度指标来评估个体的骨骼年龄。这些研究大多发表在非正畸医学期刊上。在骨龄评估研究中,BoneXpert自动化软件是最常用的软件,其次是DL模型和ML模型。发现自动化方法与人工评估方法一样可靠。结论:本综述验证了AI、ML或DL在个体骨龄评估中的应用。在不同的成熟阶段,需要更均匀地分布足够的样本,使用三维输入,如磁共振成像和锥束计算机断层扫描,以便更好地训练模型,将输出推广到目标人群中。
Use of artificial intelligence in determination of bone age of the healthy individuals: A scoping review
Background
Bone age assessment, as an indicator of biological age, is widely used in orthodontics and pediatric endocrinology. Owing to significant subject variations in the manual method of assessment, artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), and deep learning (DL) play a significant role in this aspect. A scoping review was conducted to search the existing literature on the role of AI, ML, and DL in skeletal age or bone age assessment in healthy individuals.
Methods
A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from January 2012 to December 2022 using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses–Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. Grey literature was searched using Google Scholar and OpenGrey. Hand-searching of the articles in all the reputed orthodontic journals and the references of the included articles were also searched for relevant articles for the present scoping review.
Results
Nineteen articles that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included. Ten studies used skeletal maturity indicators based on hand and wrist radiographs, two studies used magnetic resonance imaging and seven studies used cervical vertebrae maturity indicators based on lateral cephalograms to assess the skeletal age of the individuals. Most of these studies were published in non-orthodontic medical journals. BoneXpert automated software was the most commonly used software, followed by DL models, and ML models in the studies for assessment of bone age. The automated method was found to be as reliable as the manual method for assessment.
Conclusions
This scoping review validated the use of AI, ML, or DL in bone age assessment of individuals. A more uniform distribution of sufficient samples in different stages of maturation, use of three-dimensional inputs such as magnetic resonance imaging, and cone beam computed tomography is required for better training of the models to generalize the outputs for use in the target population.