使用草药治疗2型糖尿病:定性研究的系统回顾

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ctcp.2023.101808
Shraddha Sriraman , Devika Sreejith , Evie Andrew, Immaculate Okello, Merlin Willcox
{"title":"使用草药治疗2型糖尿病:定性研究的系统回顾","authors":"Shraddha Sriraman ,&nbsp;Devika Sreejith ,&nbsp;Evie Andrew,&nbsp;Immaculate Okello,&nbsp;Merlin Willcox","doi":"10.1016/j.ctcp.2023.101808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Many people with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) use herbal medicines, some of which can improve glycaemic control. Providing evidence-based advice on herbal medicines could be an effective intervention to improve control of diabetes, if it is designed to address key needs and concerns of T2DM patients.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To understand the views and experiences of patients and health professionals on herbal treatments for self-management of T2DM.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, SOCIOFILE and Google Scholar were searched for qualitative studies in T2DM patients about their views on herbal medicines. Included papers were analysed using thematic synthesis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirty-one papers (about 30 studies) were included: 20 from low-and-middle income countries, 10 from high income countries, and 1 internet-based study. Almost all studies from high income countries focussed on ethnic minorities. Many people with T2DM wanted a “cure”, and often took advice from friends and family, but also traditional healers and mass media. However, they were reluctant to discuss herbal medicines with health professionals, whom they perceived as “closed-minded”. They based their treatment decisions on personal experience (from “trial-and-error”), availability, cost and convenience of both herbal and conventional medicines. Most health professionals were reluctant to discuss herbal medicines, or recommended against their use, because of lack of knowledge and concerns about their quality, efficacy and potential interactions.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Evidence-based information could help to overcome the current lack of communication about herbal medicines between people with T2DM and health professionals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48752,"journal":{"name":"Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice","volume":"53 ","pages":"Article 101808"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1744388123000890/pdfft?md5=37843ff7c704ca6b1e01eac0d0d34575&pid=1-s2.0-S1744388123000890-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of herbal medicines for the management of type 2 diabetes: A systematic review of qualitative studies\",\"authors\":\"Shraddha Sriraman ,&nbsp;Devika Sreejith ,&nbsp;Evie Andrew,&nbsp;Immaculate Okello,&nbsp;Merlin Willcox\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ctcp.2023.101808\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Many people with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) use herbal medicines, some of which can improve glycaemic control. Providing evidence-based advice on herbal medicines could be an effective intervention to improve control of diabetes, if it is designed to address key needs and concerns of T2DM patients.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To understand the views and experiences of patients and health professionals on herbal treatments for self-management of T2DM.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, SOCIOFILE and Google Scholar were searched for qualitative studies in T2DM patients about their views on herbal medicines. Included papers were analysed using thematic synthesis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirty-one papers (about 30 studies) were included: 20 from low-and-middle income countries, 10 from high income countries, and 1 internet-based study. Almost all studies from high income countries focussed on ethnic minorities. Many people with T2DM wanted a “cure”, and often took advice from friends and family, but also traditional healers and mass media. However, they were reluctant to discuss herbal medicines with health professionals, whom they perceived as “closed-minded”. They based their treatment decisions on personal experience (from “trial-and-error”), availability, cost and convenience of both herbal and conventional medicines. Most health professionals were reluctant to discuss herbal medicines, or recommended against their use, because of lack of knowledge and concerns about their quality, efficacy and potential interactions.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Evidence-based information could help to overcome the current lack of communication about herbal medicines between people with T2DM and health professionals.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\"53 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101808\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1744388123000890/pdfft?md5=37843ff7c704ca6b1e01eac0d0d34575&pid=1-s2.0-S1744388123000890-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1744388123000890\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1744388123000890","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者使用草药,其中一些可以改善血糖控制。提供基于证据的草药建议可能是改善糖尿病控制的有效干预措施,如果它旨在解决2型糖尿病患者的关键需求和关注。目的了解T2DM患者和卫生专业人员对中药治疗自我管理的看法和体会。方法检索medline、EMBASE、CINAHL、SOCIOFILE和谷歌Scholar,对2型糖尿病患者对中草药的看法进行定性研究。采用主题综合法对纳入的论文进行分析。结果共纳入31篇论文(约30项研究):20篇来自中低收入国家,10篇来自高收入国家,1篇基于网络的研究。几乎所有来自高收入国家的研究都集中在少数民族上。许多2型糖尿病患者想要“治愈”,他们经常听取朋友和家人的建议,也听取传统治疗师和大众媒体的建议。然而,他们不愿意与卫生专业人员讨论草药,他们认为这些人“思想封闭”。他们的治疗决定基于个人经验(来自“试错”)、草药和传统药物的可得性、成本和便利性。大多数卫生专业人员不愿讨论草药,或不建议使用草药,因为他们缺乏知识,担心草药的质量、功效和潜在的相互作用。结论循证信息有助于克服目前T2DM患者与卫生专业人员在中药方面缺乏沟通的现状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Use of herbal medicines for the management of type 2 diabetes: A systematic review of qualitative studies

Background

Many people with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) use herbal medicines, some of which can improve glycaemic control. Providing evidence-based advice on herbal medicines could be an effective intervention to improve control of diabetes, if it is designed to address key needs and concerns of T2DM patients.

Aim

To understand the views and experiences of patients and health professionals on herbal treatments for self-management of T2DM.

Method

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, SOCIOFILE and Google Scholar were searched for qualitative studies in T2DM patients about their views on herbal medicines. Included papers were analysed using thematic synthesis.

Results

Thirty-one papers (about 30 studies) were included: 20 from low-and-middle income countries, 10 from high income countries, and 1 internet-based study. Almost all studies from high income countries focussed on ethnic minorities. Many people with T2DM wanted a “cure”, and often took advice from friends and family, but also traditional healers and mass media. However, they were reluctant to discuss herbal medicines with health professionals, whom they perceived as “closed-minded”. They based their treatment decisions on personal experience (from “trial-and-error”), availability, cost and convenience of both herbal and conventional medicines. Most health professionals were reluctant to discuss herbal medicines, or recommended against their use, because of lack of knowledge and concerns about their quality, efficacy and potential interactions.

Conclusion

Evidence-based information could help to overcome the current lack of communication about herbal medicines between people with T2DM and health professionals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice
Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
157
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice is an internationally refereed journal published to meet the broad ranging needs of the healthcare profession in the effective and professional integration of complementary therapies within clinical practice. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice aims to provide rigorous peer reviewed papers addressing research, implementation of complementary therapies (CTs) in the clinical setting, legal and ethical concerns, evaluative accounts of therapy in practice, philosophical analysis of emergent social trends in CTs, excellence in clinical judgement, best practice, problem management, therapy information, policy development and management of change in order to promote safe and efficacious clinical practice. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice welcomes and considers accounts of reflective practice.
期刊最新文献
Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation combined with core stability training in postpartum women with diastasis rectus abdominis Editorial Board The effect of an aromatic solution applied after percutaneous nephrolithotomy on sore throat, thirst, and nausea-vomiting: A randomised controlled trial Effects of aromatherapy on discomfort in mothers undergoing cesarean section: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Assessing barriers to meditation in patients with substance use disorder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1