《解释学与义务论:关于斯迈什尔》,《舒尔金与里斯凯尔迪耶娃的对话》

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY VOPROSY FILOSOFII Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.21146/0042-8744-2023-8-41-52
Lora T. Lora T., Nikolai N. Shulgin
{"title":"《解释学与义务论:关于斯迈什尔》,《舒尔金与里斯凯尔迪耶娃的对话》","authors":"Lora T. Lora T., Nikolai N. Shulgin","doi":"10.21146/0042-8744-2023-8-41-52","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a conversation hermeneutic deontology is discussed as a result of the synthe­sis of the concepts of Sense and Duty. The current situation in the philosophical culture is shows us an undeniable crisis, urgent search for the ways to transfer knowledge, the necessity to respond to technological and information challenges. The question raised about the nature and goals of philosophical activity, about the topology and discursive role of metaphysics, about the relationship between philosophy and creativity. The main points of posing the fundamental for Moder­nity problem of Cogito are from Descartes – Kant – Husserl to the re-actualiza­tion of the transcendental approach to consciousness nowadays. The participants of the conversation talk about possible ways to safely use of “smart machines” that successfully imitate intellectual activity and note that the activity of the Cogito can also be the opposite of comprehension as appropriation, so to speak, making Data mine. The anti-reductionist features of the Russian word “Smysl” (Sense) are noted, which allow us to see Wholeness as the source of all mean­ings, which cannot be included in Data. Such Smysl holds philosophical dis­course together, has a textual expression and deontological status, which can only be guaranteed by the efforts of the participants of the Socratic dialogue. It is noted that Russian philosophy represented by V.S. Solovyev begins not with Cogito, but with Smysl, and this beginning allows this philosophy to be a “moral project”.","PeriodicalId":46795,"journal":{"name":"VOPROSY FILOSOFII","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hermeneutics and Deontology or about Smysl, The Conversation of N.N. Shulgin and L.T. Ryskeldiyeva\",\"authors\":\"Lora T. Lora T., Nikolai N. Shulgin\",\"doi\":\"10.21146/0042-8744-2023-8-41-52\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In a conversation hermeneutic deontology is discussed as a result of the synthe­sis of the concepts of Sense and Duty. The current situation in the philosophical culture is shows us an undeniable crisis, urgent search for the ways to transfer knowledge, the necessity to respond to technological and information challenges. The question raised about the nature and goals of philosophical activity, about the topology and discursive role of metaphysics, about the relationship between philosophy and creativity. The main points of posing the fundamental for Moder­nity problem of Cogito are from Descartes – Kant – Husserl to the re-actualiza­tion of the transcendental approach to consciousness nowadays. The participants of the conversation talk about possible ways to safely use of “smart machines” that successfully imitate intellectual activity and note that the activity of the Cogito can also be the opposite of comprehension as appropriation, so to speak, making Data mine. The anti-reductionist features of the Russian word “Smysl” (Sense) are noted, which allow us to see Wholeness as the source of all mean­ings, which cannot be included in Data. Such Smysl holds philosophical dis­course together, has a textual expression and deontological status, which can only be guaranteed by the efforts of the participants of the Socratic dialogue. It is noted that Russian philosophy represented by V.S. Solovyev begins not with Cogito, but with Smysl, and this beginning allows this philosophy to be a “moral project”.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"VOPROSY FILOSOFII\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"VOPROSY FILOSOFII\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2023-8-41-52\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VOPROSY FILOSOFII","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2023-8-41-52","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在一次谈话中,解释学义务论作为意识和义务概念综合的结果被讨论。哲学文化的现状向我们展示了一种不可否认的危机,迫切寻求知识转移的途径,应对技术和信息挑战的必要性。关于哲学活动的性质和目标,关于形而上学的拓扑学和话语作用,关于哲学与创造力之间的关系的问题。从笛卡儿-康德-胡塞尔到当今对意识的先验方法的再实现,是提出“我思”现代性问题的基本观点。对话的参与者讨论了安全使用成功模仿智力活动的“智能机器”的可能方法,并注意到Cogito的活动也可以是理解的对立面,即挪用,也就是说,进行数据挖掘。注意到俄语单词“Smysl”(意义)的反还原论特征,这使我们看到整体性是所有意义的来源,这不能包括在数据中。这样的Smysl将哲学话语结合在一起,具有文本表达和义务论的地位,这只能通过苏格拉底对话参与者的努力来保证。值得注意的是,以V.S. Solovyev为代表的俄罗斯哲学不是从我思开始的,而是从Smysl开始的,这种开始使这种哲学成为一种“道德工程”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hermeneutics and Deontology or about Smysl, The Conversation of N.N. Shulgin and L.T. Ryskeldiyeva
In a conversation hermeneutic deontology is discussed as a result of the synthe­sis of the concepts of Sense and Duty. The current situation in the philosophical culture is shows us an undeniable crisis, urgent search for the ways to transfer knowledge, the necessity to respond to technological and information challenges. The question raised about the nature and goals of philosophical activity, about the topology and discursive role of metaphysics, about the relationship between philosophy and creativity. The main points of posing the fundamental for Moder­nity problem of Cogito are from Descartes – Kant – Husserl to the re-actualiza­tion of the transcendental approach to consciousness nowadays. The participants of the conversation talk about possible ways to safely use of “smart machines” that successfully imitate intellectual activity and note that the activity of the Cogito can also be the opposite of comprehension as appropriation, so to speak, making Data mine. The anti-reductionist features of the Russian word “Smysl” (Sense) are noted, which allow us to see Wholeness as the source of all mean­ings, which cannot be included in Data. Such Smysl holds philosophical dis­course together, has a textual expression and deontological status, which can only be guaranteed by the efforts of the participants of the Socratic dialogue. It is noted that Russian philosophy represented by V.S. Solovyev begins not with Cogito, but with Smysl, and this beginning allows this philosophy to be a “moral project”.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
VOPROSY FILOSOFII
VOPROSY FILOSOFII PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: "Вопросы философии" - академическое научное издание, центральный философский журнал в России. В настоящее время является органом Президиума Российской Академии Наук. Журнал "Вопросы философии" исторически тесно связан с Институтом философии РАН. Выходит ежемесячно. Журнал был основан в июле 1947 г. Интернет-версия журнала запущена в мае 2009 года.
期刊最新文献
VIZGIN, Viktor P. (2021) Between Philosophy and Literature. Works of Different Years The Symbol of the Dragon in the Cosmogonic Schemes of Ancient China Kang Youwei, Buddhism and Catholicism. Kang Youwei, The Travelogue of Italy, Trans. from Chinese into Russian and Comm. by Dmitry E. Martynov А Man in The Space of Digital Culture On the Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence and the Scientific Revolution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1