感觉连接:技术介导的沟通和情态与情感结果的关系

IF 2.4 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Multimodal Technologies and Interaction Pub Date : 2023-11-14 DOI:10.3390/mti7110105
Tamara J. Skootsky, Diana R. Sanchez, Kentaro Kawasaki
{"title":"感觉连接:技术介导的沟通和情态与情感结果的关系","authors":"Tamara J. Skootsky, Diana R. Sanchez, Kentaro Kawasaki","doi":"10.3390/mti7110105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relationship between workplace communication and affective outcomes, specifically connectedness at work and affective organizational commitment, is one that warrants further investigation for practical usage in the increasingly multimodal workplace. This study considers the frequency of use across five communication modalities, that being face-to-face, email, phone calls, instant messaging, and video calls, in relation to affective outcomes, as well as their relationships with communication meaningfulness. Employed participants (n = 516) completed an online survey in which they self-reported weekly communication tendencies, experienced connectedness, and affective organizational commitment. The final sample consisted of participants across 20 different industries in the United States. The most respondents worked in Health Care and Social Assistance or Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services (15% each), followed closely by respondents from Educational Services or Finance and Insurance (13% each). Data collection took place in between October 2021 and January 2022. Generally, participants who reported more frequent communication at work reported higher levels of connectedness and higher affective organizational commitment. Employees who found their communication more meaningful (irrespective of frequency) felt the most emotionally connected. Unique benefits of different communication modalities, as well as implications for hybrid and remote organizations, are discussed.","PeriodicalId":52297,"journal":{"name":"Multimodal Technologies and Interaction","volume":"76 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feeling Connected: Technology-Mediated Communication and the Relationship between Modality and Affective Outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Tamara J. Skootsky, Diana R. Sanchez, Kentaro Kawasaki\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/mti7110105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The relationship between workplace communication and affective outcomes, specifically connectedness at work and affective organizational commitment, is one that warrants further investigation for practical usage in the increasingly multimodal workplace. This study considers the frequency of use across five communication modalities, that being face-to-face, email, phone calls, instant messaging, and video calls, in relation to affective outcomes, as well as their relationships with communication meaningfulness. Employed participants (n = 516) completed an online survey in which they self-reported weekly communication tendencies, experienced connectedness, and affective organizational commitment. The final sample consisted of participants across 20 different industries in the United States. The most respondents worked in Health Care and Social Assistance or Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services (15% each), followed closely by respondents from Educational Services or Finance and Insurance (13% each). Data collection took place in between October 2021 and January 2022. Generally, participants who reported more frequent communication at work reported higher levels of connectedness and higher affective organizational commitment. Employees who found their communication more meaningful (irrespective of frequency) felt the most emotionally connected. Unique benefits of different communication modalities, as well as implications for hybrid and remote organizations, are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52297,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Multimodal Technologies and Interaction\",\"volume\":\"76 3\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Multimodal Technologies and Interaction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/mti7110105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multimodal Technologies and Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/mti7110105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

工作场所沟通与情感结果之间的关系,特别是工作中的连通性和情感组织承诺之间的关系,值得进一步研究,以便在日益多样化的工作场所中得到实际应用。本研究考虑了面对面、电子邮件、电话、即时消息和视频通话这五种沟通方式的使用频率与情感结果的关系,以及它们与沟通意义的关系。受雇参与者(n = 516)完成了一项在线调查,他们在调查中自我报告了每周的沟通倾向、经验联系和情感组织承诺。最后的样本由来自美国20个不同行业的参与者组成。大多数答复者在保健和社会援助或专业、科学和技术服务部门工作(各占15%),紧随其后的是教育服务部门或金融和保险部门的答复者(各占13%)。数据收集于2021年10月至2022年1月期间进行。一般来说,在工作中沟通更频繁的参与者报告了更高水平的联系和更高的情感组织承诺。发现沟通更有意义的员工(无论频率如何)感觉情感上最紧密。讨论了不同通信方式的独特好处,以及对混合组织和远程组织的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Feeling Connected: Technology-Mediated Communication and the Relationship between Modality and Affective Outcomes
The relationship between workplace communication and affective outcomes, specifically connectedness at work and affective organizational commitment, is one that warrants further investigation for practical usage in the increasingly multimodal workplace. This study considers the frequency of use across five communication modalities, that being face-to-face, email, phone calls, instant messaging, and video calls, in relation to affective outcomes, as well as their relationships with communication meaningfulness. Employed participants (n = 516) completed an online survey in which they self-reported weekly communication tendencies, experienced connectedness, and affective organizational commitment. The final sample consisted of participants across 20 different industries in the United States. The most respondents worked in Health Care and Social Assistance or Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services (15% each), followed closely by respondents from Educational Services or Finance and Insurance (13% each). Data collection took place in between October 2021 and January 2022. Generally, participants who reported more frequent communication at work reported higher levels of connectedness and higher affective organizational commitment. Employees who found their communication more meaningful (irrespective of frequency) felt the most emotionally connected. Unique benefits of different communication modalities, as well as implications for hybrid and remote organizations, are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Multimodal Technologies and Interaction
Multimodal Technologies and Interaction Computer Science-Computer Science Applications
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Optical Rules to Mitigate the Parallax-Related Registration Error in See-Through Head-Mounted Displays for the Guidance of Manual Tasks Virtual Reality Assessment of Attention Deficits in Traumatic Brain Injury: Effectiveness and Ecological Validity Applying Cognitive Load Theory to eLearning of Crafts The Role of Haptics in Training and Games for Hearing-Impaired Individuals: A Systematic Review “A Safe Space for Sharing Feelings”: Perspectives of Children with Lived Experiences of Anxiety on Social Robots
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1