将联盟记忆场所转变为相遇空间:在马库斯-大卫彼得斯圈回收空间

IF 1.1 2区 文学 Q3 COMMUNICATION Rhetoric Society Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-10-06 DOI:10.1080/02773945.2023.2232815
Kelly Williams Nagel
{"title":"将联盟记忆场所转变为相遇空间:在马库斯-大卫彼得斯圈回收空间","authors":"Kelly Williams Nagel","doi":"10.1080/02773945.2023.2232815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTIn the wake of George Floyd’s murder by Minneapolis police in May 2020, cities across the United States erupted in protest. These public displays reignited debates over the presence of Confederate monuments, such as the Robert E. Lee statue in Richmond, Virginia. This essay examines several protest events at the Lee statue memorial space in summer 2020, arguing that these moments are a sustained form of a space for encounter. Protestors reclaimed the Lee statue through art and renaming the space, celebrating Black heritage and excellence, and creating educational, accessible, and safe spaces to encourage conversations about racial justice across social differences. The Lee memorial space, renamed Marcus-David Peters Circle by protestors, shows how spaces for encounter can navigate moments of contingency and eligibility for antiracist activism, and how other toxic memory sites can be remade into generative spaces that offer alternative visions of the future.KEYWORDS: Lost Causeprotest rhetoricspublic memoryspace/place AcknowledgmentsThe author expresses her sincerest thanks to Jacqueline Rhodes, Cheryl Glenn, Michele Kennerly, Jeff Nagel, and the anonymous reviewers for their help at every step of the process.Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Spanish translation: “together we are powerful!”","PeriodicalId":45453,"journal":{"name":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transforming Confederate Memory Sites into Spaces for Encounter: Reclaiming Space at Marcus-David Peters Circle\",\"authors\":\"Kelly Williams Nagel\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02773945.2023.2232815\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTIn the wake of George Floyd’s murder by Minneapolis police in May 2020, cities across the United States erupted in protest. These public displays reignited debates over the presence of Confederate monuments, such as the Robert E. Lee statue in Richmond, Virginia. This essay examines several protest events at the Lee statue memorial space in summer 2020, arguing that these moments are a sustained form of a space for encounter. Protestors reclaimed the Lee statue through art and renaming the space, celebrating Black heritage and excellence, and creating educational, accessible, and safe spaces to encourage conversations about racial justice across social differences. The Lee memorial space, renamed Marcus-David Peters Circle by protestors, shows how spaces for encounter can navigate moments of contingency and eligibility for antiracist activism, and how other toxic memory sites can be remade into generative spaces that offer alternative visions of the future.KEYWORDS: Lost Causeprotest rhetoricspublic memoryspace/place AcknowledgmentsThe author expresses her sincerest thanks to Jacqueline Rhodes, Cheryl Glenn, Michele Kennerly, Jeff Nagel, and the anonymous reviewers for their help at every step of the process.Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Spanish translation: “together we are powerful!”\",\"PeriodicalId\":45453,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rhetoric Society Quarterly\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rhetoric Society Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02773945.2023.2232815\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02773945.2023.2232815","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2020年5月,乔治·弗洛伊德被明尼阿波利斯警方谋杀后,美国各城市爆发了抗议活动。这些公开展示再次引发了关于邦联纪念碑存在的争论,比如弗吉尼亚州里士满的罗伯特·e·李雕像。本文研究了2020年夏天李雕像纪念空间的几起抗议事件,认为这些时刻是一种持续的相遇空间形式。抗议者通过艺术和重新命名空间,重新获得了李的雕像,庆祝黑人遗产和卓越,并创造了教育,无障碍和安全的空间,以鼓励跨越社会差异的种族正义对话。李的纪念空间,被抗议者重新命名为马库斯-大卫彼得斯圈,展示了相遇的空间如何在偶然的时刻和反种族主义激进主义的资格中导航,以及其他有毒的记忆场所如何被改造成提供未来替代愿景的生成空间。作者对杰奎琳·罗兹、谢丽尔·格伦、米歇尔·肯纳利、杰夫·内格尔和匿名审稿人在写作过程中的每一步给予的帮助表示最诚挚的感谢。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1西班牙语翻译:“团结起来,我们就是强大的!”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Transforming Confederate Memory Sites into Spaces for Encounter: Reclaiming Space at Marcus-David Peters Circle
ABSTRACTIn the wake of George Floyd’s murder by Minneapolis police in May 2020, cities across the United States erupted in protest. These public displays reignited debates over the presence of Confederate monuments, such as the Robert E. Lee statue in Richmond, Virginia. This essay examines several protest events at the Lee statue memorial space in summer 2020, arguing that these moments are a sustained form of a space for encounter. Protestors reclaimed the Lee statue through art and renaming the space, celebrating Black heritage and excellence, and creating educational, accessible, and safe spaces to encourage conversations about racial justice across social differences. The Lee memorial space, renamed Marcus-David Peters Circle by protestors, shows how spaces for encounter can navigate moments of contingency and eligibility for antiracist activism, and how other toxic memory sites can be remade into generative spaces that offer alternative visions of the future.KEYWORDS: Lost Causeprotest rhetoricspublic memoryspace/place AcknowledgmentsThe author expresses her sincerest thanks to Jacqueline Rhodes, Cheryl Glenn, Michele Kennerly, Jeff Nagel, and the anonymous reviewers for their help at every step of the process.Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Spanish translation: “together we are powerful!”
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
What Can a Body Do?: How We Meet the Built World A Forum on Neurorhetorics: Conscious of the Past, Mindful of the Future Nestwork: New Material Rhetorics for Precarious Species Ambient Engineering: Hyper-Nudging, Hyper-Relevance, and Rhetorics of Nearness and Farness in a Post-AI Algorithmic World Conspiracy Theater of the Absurd: “Birds Aren’t Real” as Parodic Hypermimesis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1