Xiaodong Huang, Godfrey Yeung, Tingzhu Li, Debin Du
{"title":"后发经济体企业技术资产的接近性与跨境收购:基于中国企业的研究,2001-2018","authors":"Xiaodong Huang, Godfrey Yeung, Tingzhu Li, Debin Du","doi":"10.1080/15387216.2023.2282028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTWe propose an analytical framework to examine how various dimensions of proximity between home and host countries could account for the trajectories and specificities of cross-border acquisitions of technology assets (CATAs) conducted by acquirer firms in latecomer economies. As Chinese firms have been increasingly using CATAs as a mean to catch up with their counterparts in advanced economies, we referred to their acquisition records to illustrate the applicability of the proposed framework. Based on a compiled dataset of the number of CATA transactions from 2001 to 2018, this paper examines the effects of various dimensions of proximity on the spatio-temporal patterns of Chinese CATAs using negative binomial regression models. Our findings demonstrate that the difference in governance between China and host countries (institutional proximity), the size of overseas Chinese population in host countries (social proximity), and the value of import from host countries (economic proximity) have significant effects on the propensity of Chinese firms to engage in CATAs. Physical distance and cultural gap between China and host countries, however, have no significant impact on CATAs. Further examination of the results reveals that Chinese firms tend to acquire target firms outright in culturally distant host countries to reduce the risk of their overseas acquisition in CATAs. In addition, we also found that there is a dynamic relationship between different dimensions of proximity and CATAs: from the relative importance of economic proximity between 2001 and 2012 to the rising influence of social and institutional proximity between 2013 and 2018 on CATAs.KEYWORDS: Technological acquisitionscross-border M&AproximityInnovationlatecomer economyChinese firm Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. The BVD-Zephyr M&A database defines a transaction as “expected to be completed” if it is in normal progression and has not updated its status in two years.2. We followed the convention by classifying enterprises based in Hong Kong and Macau special administrative regions as host regions.Additional informationFundingThe first author was supported by the China Scholarship Council [202106140100]. This work was supported by the Major Projects of National Social Science Foundation of China [19ZDA087].","PeriodicalId":47508,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Geography and Economics","volume":"13 8","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proximity and cross-border acquisitions of technology assets by firms in latecomer economies: a study of Chinese firms, 2001-2018\",\"authors\":\"Xiaodong Huang, Godfrey Yeung, Tingzhu Li, Debin Du\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15387216.2023.2282028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTWe propose an analytical framework to examine how various dimensions of proximity between home and host countries could account for the trajectories and specificities of cross-border acquisitions of technology assets (CATAs) conducted by acquirer firms in latecomer economies. As Chinese firms have been increasingly using CATAs as a mean to catch up with their counterparts in advanced economies, we referred to their acquisition records to illustrate the applicability of the proposed framework. Based on a compiled dataset of the number of CATA transactions from 2001 to 2018, this paper examines the effects of various dimensions of proximity on the spatio-temporal patterns of Chinese CATAs using negative binomial regression models. Our findings demonstrate that the difference in governance between China and host countries (institutional proximity), the size of overseas Chinese population in host countries (social proximity), and the value of import from host countries (economic proximity) have significant effects on the propensity of Chinese firms to engage in CATAs. Physical distance and cultural gap between China and host countries, however, have no significant impact on CATAs. Further examination of the results reveals that Chinese firms tend to acquire target firms outright in culturally distant host countries to reduce the risk of their overseas acquisition in CATAs. In addition, we also found that there is a dynamic relationship between different dimensions of proximity and CATAs: from the relative importance of economic proximity between 2001 and 2012 to the rising influence of social and institutional proximity between 2013 and 2018 on CATAs.KEYWORDS: Technological acquisitionscross-border M&AproximityInnovationlatecomer economyChinese firm Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. The BVD-Zephyr M&A database defines a transaction as “expected to be completed” if it is in normal progression and has not updated its status in two years.2. We followed the convention by classifying enterprises based in Hong Kong and Macau special administrative regions as host regions.Additional informationFundingThe first author was supported by the China Scholarship Council [202106140100]. This work was supported by the Major Projects of National Social Science Foundation of China [19ZDA087].\",\"PeriodicalId\":47508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eurasian Geography and Economics\",\"volume\":\"13 8\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eurasian Geography and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2023.2282028\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Geography and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2023.2282028","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Proximity and cross-border acquisitions of technology assets by firms in latecomer economies: a study of Chinese firms, 2001-2018
ABSTRACTWe propose an analytical framework to examine how various dimensions of proximity between home and host countries could account for the trajectories and specificities of cross-border acquisitions of technology assets (CATAs) conducted by acquirer firms in latecomer economies. As Chinese firms have been increasingly using CATAs as a mean to catch up with their counterparts in advanced economies, we referred to their acquisition records to illustrate the applicability of the proposed framework. Based on a compiled dataset of the number of CATA transactions from 2001 to 2018, this paper examines the effects of various dimensions of proximity on the spatio-temporal patterns of Chinese CATAs using negative binomial regression models. Our findings demonstrate that the difference in governance between China and host countries (institutional proximity), the size of overseas Chinese population in host countries (social proximity), and the value of import from host countries (economic proximity) have significant effects on the propensity of Chinese firms to engage in CATAs. Physical distance and cultural gap between China and host countries, however, have no significant impact on CATAs. Further examination of the results reveals that Chinese firms tend to acquire target firms outright in culturally distant host countries to reduce the risk of their overseas acquisition in CATAs. In addition, we also found that there is a dynamic relationship between different dimensions of proximity and CATAs: from the relative importance of economic proximity between 2001 and 2012 to the rising influence of social and institutional proximity between 2013 and 2018 on CATAs.KEYWORDS: Technological acquisitionscross-border M&AproximityInnovationlatecomer economyChinese firm Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. The BVD-Zephyr M&A database defines a transaction as “expected to be completed” if it is in normal progression and has not updated its status in two years.2. We followed the convention by classifying enterprises based in Hong Kong and Macau special administrative regions as host regions.Additional informationFundingThe first author was supported by the China Scholarship Council [202106140100]. This work was supported by the Major Projects of National Social Science Foundation of China [19ZDA087].
期刊介绍:
Eurasian Geography and Economics, a bimonthly affiliated with the Kennan Institute for Advanced Russian Studies and the American Association for the Advancement of Slavic Studies , will publish timely, original papers in geography and economics covering all states of the former USSR as well as Asiatic and European countries on or beyond their present borders within the Eurasian realm , with a particular emphasis on China .