后发经济体企业技术资产的接近性与跨境收购:基于中国企业的研究,2001-2018

IF 1.7 2区 经济学 Q1 AREA STUDIES Eurasian Geography and Economics Pub Date : 2023-11-14 DOI:10.1080/15387216.2023.2282028
Xiaodong Huang, Godfrey Yeung, Tingzhu Li, Debin Du
{"title":"后发经济体企业技术资产的接近性与跨境收购:基于中国企业的研究,2001-2018","authors":"Xiaodong Huang, Godfrey Yeung, Tingzhu Li, Debin Du","doi":"10.1080/15387216.2023.2282028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTWe propose an analytical framework to examine how various dimensions of proximity between home and host countries could account for the trajectories and specificities of cross-border acquisitions of technology assets (CATAs) conducted by acquirer firms in latecomer economies. As Chinese firms have been increasingly using CATAs as a mean to catch up with their counterparts in advanced economies, we referred to their acquisition records to illustrate the applicability of the proposed framework. Based on a compiled dataset of the number of CATA transactions from 2001 to 2018, this paper examines the effects of various dimensions of proximity on the spatio-temporal patterns of Chinese CATAs using negative binomial regression models. Our findings demonstrate that the difference in governance between China and host countries (institutional proximity), the size of overseas Chinese population in host countries (social proximity), and the value of import from host countries (economic proximity) have significant effects on the propensity of Chinese firms to engage in CATAs. Physical distance and cultural gap between China and host countries, however, have no significant impact on CATAs. Further examination of the results reveals that Chinese firms tend to acquire target firms outright in culturally distant host countries to reduce the risk of their overseas acquisition in CATAs. In addition, we also found that there is a dynamic relationship between different dimensions of proximity and CATAs: from the relative importance of economic proximity between 2001 and 2012 to the rising influence of social and institutional proximity between 2013 and 2018 on CATAs.KEYWORDS: Technological acquisitionscross-border M&AproximityInnovationlatecomer economyChinese firm Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. The BVD-Zephyr M&A database defines a transaction as “expected to be completed” if it is in normal progression and has not updated its status in two years.2. We followed the convention by classifying enterprises based in Hong Kong and Macau special administrative regions as host regions.Additional informationFundingThe first author was supported by the China Scholarship Council [202106140100]. This work was supported by the Major Projects of National Social Science Foundation of China [19ZDA087].","PeriodicalId":47508,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Geography and Economics","volume":"13 8","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proximity and cross-border acquisitions of technology assets by firms in latecomer economies: a study of Chinese firms, 2001-2018\",\"authors\":\"Xiaodong Huang, Godfrey Yeung, Tingzhu Li, Debin Du\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15387216.2023.2282028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTWe propose an analytical framework to examine how various dimensions of proximity between home and host countries could account for the trajectories and specificities of cross-border acquisitions of technology assets (CATAs) conducted by acquirer firms in latecomer economies. As Chinese firms have been increasingly using CATAs as a mean to catch up with their counterparts in advanced economies, we referred to their acquisition records to illustrate the applicability of the proposed framework. Based on a compiled dataset of the number of CATA transactions from 2001 to 2018, this paper examines the effects of various dimensions of proximity on the spatio-temporal patterns of Chinese CATAs using negative binomial regression models. Our findings demonstrate that the difference in governance between China and host countries (institutional proximity), the size of overseas Chinese population in host countries (social proximity), and the value of import from host countries (economic proximity) have significant effects on the propensity of Chinese firms to engage in CATAs. Physical distance and cultural gap between China and host countries, however, have no significant impact on CATAs. Further examination of the results reveals that Chinese firms tend to acquire target firms outright in culturally distant host countries to reduce the risk of their overseas acquisition in CATAs. In addition, we also found that there is a dynamic relationship between different dimensions of proximity and CATAs: from the relative importance of economic proximity between 2001 and 2012 to the rising influence of social and institutional proximity between 2013 and 2018 on CATAs.KEYWORDS: Technological acquisitionscross-border M&AproximityInnovationlatecomer economyChinese firm Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. The BVD-Zephyr M&A database defines a transaction as “expected to be completed” if it is in normal progression and has not updated its status in two years.2. We followed the convention by classifying enterprises based in Hong Kong and Macau special administrative regions as host regions.Additional informationFundingThe first author was supported by the China Scholarship Council [202106140100]. This work was supported by the Major Projects of National Social Science Foundation of China [19ZDA087].\",\"PeriodicalId\":47508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eurasian Geography and Economics\",\"volume\":\"13 8\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eurasian Geography and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2023.2282028\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Geography and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2023.2282028","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文提出了一个分析框架,以考察母国和东道国之间的不同接近度如何解释后发经济体中收购方进行的技术资产跨境收购(CATAs)的轨迹和特殊性。由于中国企业越来越多地将cata作为追赶发达经济体同行的一种手段,我们参考了它们的收购记录来说明拟议框架的适用性。基于2001 - 2018年中国航空运输交易数据,采用负二项回归模型,分析了邻近度对中国航空运输交易时空格局的影响。我们的研究结果表明,中国与东道国的治理差异(制度邻近性)、东道国华侨人口规模(社会邻近性)和东道国进口价值(经济邻近性)对中国企业参与联合贸易协定的倾向有显著影响。然而,中国与东道国之间的物理距离和文化差异对cata没有显著影响。进一步研究结果表明,中国企业倾向于直接收购文化距离较远的东道国的目标企业,以降低其在cata中的海外收购风险。此外,我们还发现,不同维度的接近性与CATAs之间存在动态关系:从2001 - 2012年经济接近性的相对重要性到2013 - 2018年社会和制度接近性对CATAs的影响上升。关键词:技术收购跨境并购邻近创新后发经济中国企业披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突BVD-Zephyr并购数据库将正常进行且两年内未更新状态的交易定义为“预期完成”。我们按照惯例,将香港、澳门特别行政区的企业归类为东道国。本文第一作者由中国国家留学基金委资助[202106140100]。国家社科基金重大项目[19ZDA087]资助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Proximity and cross-border acquisitions of technology assets by firms in latecomer economies: a study of Chinese firms, 2001-2018
ABSTRACTWe propose an analytical framework to examine how various dimensions of proximity between home and host countries could account for the trajectories and specificities of cross-border acquisitions of technology assets (CATAs) conducted by acquirer firms in latecomer economies. As Chinese firms have been increasingly using CATAs as a mean to catch up with their counterparts in advanced economies, we referred to their acquisition records to illustrate the applicability of the proposed framework. Based on a compiled dataset of the number of CATA transactions from 2001 to 2018, this paper examines the effects of various dimensions of proximity on the spatio-temporal patterns of Chinese CATAs using negative binomial regression models. Our findings demonstrate that the difference in governance between China and host countries (institutional proximity), the size of overseas Chinese population in host countries (social proximity), and the value of import from host countries (economic proximity) have significant effects on the propensity of Chinese firms to engage in CATAs. Physical distance and cultural gap between China and host countries, however, have no significant impact on CATAs. Further examination of the results reveals that Chinese firms tend to acquire target firms outright in culturally distant host countries to reduce the risk of their overseas acquisition in CATAs. In addition, we also found that there is a dynamic relationship between different dimensions of proximity and CATAs: from the relative importance of economic proximity between 2001 and 2012 to the rising influence of social and institutional proximity between 2013 and 2018 on CATAs.KEYWORDS: Technological acquisitionscross-border M&AproximityInnovationlatecomer economyChinese firm Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. The BVD-Zephyr M&A database defines a transaction as “expected to be completed” if it is in normal progression and has not updated its status in two years.2. We followed the convention by classifying enterprises based in Hong Kong and Macau special administrative regions as host regions.Additional informationFundingThe first author was supported by the China Scholarship Council [202106140100]. This work was supported by the Major Projects of National Social Science Foundation of China [19ZDA087].
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
2.60%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: Eurasian Geography and Economics, a bimonthly affiliated with the Kennan Institute for Advanced Russian Studies and the American Association for the Advancement of Slavic Studies , will publish timely, original papers in geography and economics covering all states of the former USSR as well as Asiatic and European countries on or beyond their present borders within the Eurasian realm , with a particular emphasis on China .
期刊最新文献
Rethinking peripheral geographies of innovation: towards an ordinary periphery approach International rivers as national borders: the functional complexity of border river governance with a case study of the Khorgos river Logistical fixes and China’s spatial division of logistics integration - in search of economic rebalancing? Living together or apart? International migrants and family coresidence in Yiwu, China Peripheral centers: vertical politics and the geography of Chinese cross-border opium replacement in Southeast Asia’s “New Golden Triangle”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1