英语新闻媒体语篇可信度范畴的话语标记

IF 0.6 Q3 COMMUNICATION Theoretical and Practical Issues of Journalism Pub Date : 2023-10-26 DOI:10.30853/phil20230563
Irina Olegovna Syresina
{"title":"英语新闻媒体语篇可信度范畴的话语标记","authors":"Irina Olegovna Syresina","doi":"10.30853/phil20230563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aims to identify the discourse markers of the credibility category in contemporary English-language news media texts, applying the discourse-dictemic model of communication. The scientific novelty of the study lies in describing credibility as a discourse category and identifying its markers at the proposematic and the dictemic level. As a result, it has been found that the credibility category is modelled in media texts in three ways: firstly, the use of ethical or formal discourse markers, such as quotations, utilisation of proper names, presentation of numerical data, photos and videos, only ensures ethical or formal credibility of news media texts; secondly, within the field of problematic credibility, different pragmatic orientations of news media texts can be realised in dictemas; thirdly, credibility is realised in narrative and argumentative dictemas through textual (dictemic) cohesion, forming a specific semantic space where specific syntactic language means serve as discourse markers of credibility.","PeriodicalId":43335,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical and Practical Issues of Journalism","volume":"22 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discourse markers of the credibility category in English-language news media texts\",\"authors\":\"Irina Olegovna Syresina\",\"doi\":\"10.30853/phil20230563\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study aims to identify the discourse markers of the credibility category in contemporary English-language news media texts, applying the discourse-dictemic model of communication. The scientific novelty of the study lies in describing credibility as a discourse category and identifying its markers at the proposematic and the dictemic level. As a result, it has been found that the credibility category is modelled in media texts in three ways: firstly, the use of ethical or formal discourse markers, such as quotations, utilisation of proper names, presentation of numerical data, photos and videos, only ensures ethical or formal credibility of news media texts; secondly, within the field of problematic credibility, different pragmatic orientations of news media texts can be realised in dictemas; thirdly, credibility is realised in narrative and argumentative dictemas through textual (dictemic) cohesion, forming a specific semantic space where specific syntactic language means serve as discourse markers of credibility.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theoretical and Practical Issues of Journalism\",\"volume\":\"22 4\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theoretical and Practical Issues of Journalism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30853/phil20230563\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoretical and Practical Issues of Journalism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30853/phil20230563","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在运用话语指示学的传播模型,识别当代英语新闻媒体语篇中可信度范畴的话语标记。该研究的科学新颖之处在于将可信度描述为一个话语范畴,并在建议和指示层面识别其标记。因此,研究发现,可信度类别在媒体文本中以三种方式建模:首先,使用伦理或正式话语标记,如引文、专有名称的使用、数字数据、照片和视频的呈现,只能确保新闻媒体文本的伦理或正式可信度;其次,在问题可信度领域内,新闻媒体语篇的不同语用取向可以在语词中实现;第三,可信度是通过语篇衔接在叙事性和议论性口述语中实现的,形成特定的语义空间,特定的句法语言手段成为可信度的话语标记。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Discourse markers of the credibility category in English-language news media texts
The study aims to identify the discourse markers of the credibility category in contemporary English-language news media texts, applying the discourse-dictemic model of communication. The scientific novelty of the study lies in describing credibility as a discourse category and identifying its markers at the proposematic and the dictemic level. As a result, it has been found that the credibility category is modelled in media texts in three ways: firstly, the use of ethical or formal discourse markers, such as quotations, utilisation of proper names, presentation of numerical data, photos and videos, only ensures ethical or formal credibility of news media texts; secondly, within the field of problematic credibility, different pragmatic orientations of news media texts can be realised in dictemas; thirdly, credibility is realised in narrative and argumentative dictemas through textual (dictemic) cohesion, forming a specific semantic space where specific syntactic language means serve as discourse markers of credibility.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
66.70%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Features of verbal phraseological units in the Ingush language Multifunctionality of the objective world of N. Musin’s novel “The Eternal Forest” Indirect object models in the language of Old Turkic runic monuments Perceptual space in the short story “Lieutenant Yergunov’s Story” by I. S. Turgenev German idiomatic expressions with the names of countries, nationalities and languages: Structural-semantic and linguoculturological features
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1