真菌致敏及其对哮喘控制的影响——过敏临床前瞻性研究

Anil Kumar, AnilKumar Jain
{"title":"真菌致敏及其对哮喘控制的影响——过敏临床前瞻性研究","authors":"Anil Kumar, AnilKumar Jain","doi":"10.4103/ijaai.ijaai_17_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Various factors are involved in poorly controlled asthma despite adequate medication and proper inhalation techniques. Mold sensitivity has been associated with increased rates of hospital and intensive care admissions in adults. The fungal sensitization with severe asthma has been coined to describe fungal-sensitized patients with treatment-resistant asthma. The objective of this study was to compare asthma control between fungal- and nonfungal-sensitized (NFS) asthma patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-six cases of asthma were included over a period of 12 months in this prospective study. Data were captured using a proforma. Skin prick test was done as per standard protocol in all patients and a control assessment was done after 6–8 weeks of treatment as per GINA guidelines using Asthma Control Test (ACT) score. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 24.0. RESULTS: Out of 56 enrolled, 32.1% were fungal sensitized and 55.4% to NFS. Seven (12.5%) patients did not have clinically significant reactions. Maximum sensitization was found with Aspergillus spp. but no sensitization with Epicoccum and Cladosporium. Asthma was found to be poorly controlled in 77.8% of the fungal-sensitized group with a mean ACT score of 17.7 ± 1.8 as compared to 6.5% in the NFS group with mean ACT of 21.35 ± 1.6, respectively (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Fungal sensitization was associated with poorly controlled asthma despite adequate medications and education. Early diagnosis and treatment in these patients with antifungals may improve quality of life, reduce exacerbations, and control of the primary disease.","PeriodicalId":53075,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Allergy Asthma and Immunology","volume":"294 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fungal sensitization and its impact on asthma control – A prospective study at allergy clinic\",\"authors\":\"Anil Kumar, AnilKumar Jain\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijaai.ijaai_17_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: Various factors are involved in poorly controlled asthma despite adequate medication and proper inhalation techniques. Mold sensitivity has been associated with increased rates of hospital and intensive care admissions in adults. The fungal sensitization with severe asthma has been coined to describe fungal-sensitized patients with treatment-resistant asthma. The objective of this study was to compare asthma control between fungal- and nonfungal-sensitized (NFS) asthma patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-six cases of asthma were included over a period of 12 months in this prospective study. Data were captured using a proforma. Skin prick test was done as per standard protocol in all patients and a control assessment was done after 6–8 weeks of treatment as per GINA guidelines using Asthma Control Test (ACT) score. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 24.0. RESULTS: Out of 56 enrolled, 32.1% were fungal sensitized and 55.4% to NFS. Seven (12.5%) patients did not have clinically significant reactions. Maximum sensitization was found with Aspergillus spp. but no sensitization with Epicoccum and Cladosporium. Asthma was found to be poorly controlled in 77.8% of the fungal-sensitized group with a mean ACT score of 17.7 ± 1.8 as compared to 6.5% in the NFS group with mean ACT of 21.35 ± 1.6, respectively (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Fungal sensitization was associated with poorly controlled asthma despite adequate medications and education. Early diagnosis and treatment in these patients with antifungals may improve quality of life, reduce exacerbations, and control of the primary disease.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Allergy Asthma and Immunology\",\"volume\":\"294 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Allergy Asthma and Immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijaai.ijaai_17_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Allergy Asthma and Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijaai.ijaai_17_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管有足够的药物和适当的吸入技术,但各种因素都涉及控制不良的哮喘。霉菌敏感性与成人住院和重症监护住院率的增加有关。真菌致敏与严重哮喘已被创造来描述真菌致敏患者的治疗抵抗性哮喘。本研究的目的是比较真菌和非真菌致敏(NFS)哮喘患者的哮喘控制情况。材料与方法:这项前瞻性研究纳入了56例哮喘患者,为期12个月。使用形式表格捕获数据。按照标准方案对所有患者进行皮肤点刺试验,并在治疗6-8周后按照GINA指南使用哮喘控制测试(ACT)评分进行对照评估。数据分析采用SPSS 24.0版本。结果:56例入组患者中,32.1%真菌致敏,55.4%对NFS致敏。7例(12.5%)患者无明显临床反应。对曲霉有最大的致敏作用,而对表表皮菌和枝孢菌没有致敏作用。77.8%的真菌致敏组哮喘控制不良,平均ACT评分为17.7±1.8,而NFS组哮喘控制不良的比例为6.5%,平均ACT评分为21.35±1.6 (P < 0.0001)。结论:真菌致敏与哮喘控制不良相关,尽管有适当的药物和教育。早期诊断和治疗这些患者的抗真菌药物可以改善生活质量,减少恶化,并控制原发疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fungal sensitization and its impact on asthma control – A prospective study at allergy clinic
BACKGROUND: Various factors are involved in poorly controlled asthma despite adequate medication and proper inhalation techniques. Mold sensitivity has been associated with increased rates of hospital and intensive care admissions in adults. The fungal sensitization with severe asthma has been coined to describe fungal-sensitized patients with treatment-resistant asthma. The objective of this study was to compare asthma control between fungal- and nonfungal-sensitized (NFS) asthma patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-six cases of asthma were included over a period of 12 months in this prospective study. Data were captured using a proforma. Skin prick test was done as per standard protocol in all patients and a control assessment was done after 6–8 weeks of treatment as per GINA guidelines using Asthma Control Test (ACT) score. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 24.0. RESULTS: Out of 56 enrolled, 32.1% were fungal sensitized and 55.4% to NFS. Seven (12.5%) patients did not have clinically significant reactions. Maximum sensitization was found with Aspergillus spp. but no sensitization with Epicoccum and Cladosporium. Asthma was found to be poorly controlled in 77.8% of the fungal-sensitized group with a mean ACT score of 17.7 ± 1.8 as compared to 6.5% in the NFS group with mean ACT of 21.35 ± 1.6, respectively (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Fungal sensitization was associated with poorly controlled asthma despite adequate medications and education. Early diagnosis and treatment in these patients with antifungals may improve quality of life, reduce exacerbations, and control of the primary disease.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Serum level of interleukin-6, interleukin-17A, and interferon-α in hospitalized COVID-19 patients and their clinical correlation: A hospital-based case–control study from North-East India Fungal sensitization and its impact on asthma control – A prospective study at allergy clinic Concurrent administration of COVID-19 vaccine and seasonal influenza vaccine: Expected rate of adverse effect Quality of life assessment in children and their caregivers suffering from allergic rhinitis and/or asthma Asthma management with the help of digital therapeutics: Review of clinical trials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1