AZD9567与强的松龙对2型糖尿病患者血糖控制的影响:来自2a期临床试验的结果

Philip Ambery, Grzegorz Zajac, Joachim Almquist, Susanne Prothon, Carol Astbury, Mary Brown, Szilard Nemes, Joselyne Nsabimana, Karl Edman, Lisa Oberg, Matti Lepisto, Goran Endro, Suman Mitra, Graham Belfield, Christina Keen, Tim Heise
{"title":"AZD9567与强的松龙对2型糖尿病患者血糖控制的影响:来自2a期临床试验的结果","authors":"Philip Ambery, Grzegorz Zajac, Joachim Almquist, Susanne Prothon, Carol Astbury, Mary Brown, Szilard Nemes, Joselyne Nsabimana, Karl Edman, Lisa Oberg, Matti Lepisto, Goran Endro, Suman Mitra, Graham Belfield, Christina Keen, Tim Heise","doi":"10.22541/au.169994075.59042911/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims Corticosteroids are the treatment of choice for many inflammatory diseases, but often lead to adverse effects, including hyperglycemia. This study investigated the mechanisms driving differential effects on glucose control for AZD9567, a novel oral, non-steroidal, selective glucocorticoid receptor modulator, versus prednisolone in 46 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods In this randomized, double-blind, 2-way cross-over study (NCT04556760), participants received either AZD9567 72 mg and prednisolone 40 mg daily (Cohort 1); AZD9567 40 mg and prednisolone 20 mg daily (Cohort 2); or placebo and prednisolone 5 mg daily (Cohort 3). Treatment duration was 3 days with a 3-week washout between treatment periods. Glycemic control was assessed after a standardized meal and with continuous glucose monitoring. Results A significant difference between AZD9567 and prednisolone in favour of AZD9567 was observed for the change from baseline to Day 4 glucose excursions post-meal in Cohort 1 (glucose AUC0-4h -4.54%; 95% CI: -8.88, -0.01; p=0.049), but not in Cohort 2 (-5.77%; 95% CI: -20.92, 12.29; p=0.435). In Cohort 1, significant differences between AZD9567 and prednisolone were also seen for the change from baseline to Day 4 in insulin and glucagon secretion post-meal (p<0.001 and p=0.005, respectively), and change from baseline to Day 4 in GLP-1 response (p=0.022). Significant differences between AZD9567 and prednisolone for 24-hour glucose control were observed for both Cohort 1 (-1.507 mmol/L; 95% CI: -2.0820, -0.9314; p<0.001), and Cohort 2 (-1.110 mmol/L; 95% CI -1.7257, -0.4941; p<0.001). Conclusions AZD9567 significantly reduced treatment-induced hyperglycemia compared with prednisolone.","PeriodicalId":487619,"journal":{"name":"Authorea (Authorea)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of AZD9567 versus prednisolone on glycemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus: Results from a Phase 2a clinical trial\",\"authors\":\"Philip Ambery, Grzegorz Zajac, Joachim Almquist, Susanne Prothon, Carol Astbury, Mary Brown, Szilard Nemes, Joselyne Nsabimana, Karl Edman, Lisa Oberg, Matti Lepisto, Goran Endro, Suman Mitra, Graham Belfield, Christina Keen, Tim Heise\",\"doi\":\"10.22541/au.169994075.59042911/v1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aims Corticosteroids are the treatment of choice for many inflammatory diseases, but often lead to adverse effects, including hyperglycemia. This study investigated the mechanisms driving differential effects on glucose control for AZD9567, a novel oral, non-steroidal, selective glucocorticoid receptor modulator, versus prednisolone in 46 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods In this randomized, double-blind, 2-way cross-over study (NCT04556760), participants received either AZD9567 72 mg and prednisolone 40 mg daily (Cohort 1); AZD9567 40 mg and prednisolone 20 mg daily (Cohort 2); or placebo and prednisolone 5 mg daily (Cohort 3). Treatment duration was 3 days with a 3-week washout between treatment periods. Glycemic control was assessed after a standardized meal and with continuous glucose monitoring. Results A significant difference between AZD9567 and prednisolone in favour of AZD9567 was observed for the change from baseline to Day 4 glucose excursions post-meal in Cohort 1 (glucose AUC0-4h -4.54%; 95% CI: -8.88, -0.01; p=0.049), but not in Cohort 2 (-5.77%; 95% CI: -20.92, 12.29; p=0.435). In Cohort 1, significant differences between AZD9567 and prednisolone were also seen for the change from baseline to Day 4 in insulin and glucagon secretion post-meal (p<0.001 and p=0.005, respectively), and change from baseline to Day 4 in GLP-1 response (p=0.022). Significant differences between AZD9567 and prednisolone for 24-hour glucose control were observed for both Cohort 1 (-1.507 mmol/L; 95% CI: -2.0820, -0.9314; p<0.001), and Cohort 2 (-1.110 mmol/L; 95% CI -1.7257, -0.4941; p<0.001). Conclusions AZD9567 significantly reduced treatment-induced hyperglycemia compared with prednisolone.\",\"PeriodicalId\":487619,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Authorea (Authorea)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Authorea (Authorea)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22541/au.169994075.59042911/v1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Authorea (Authorea)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22541/au.169994075.59042911/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的糖皮质激素是许多炎症性疾病的治疗选择,但往往导致不良反应,包括高血糖。在46例2型糖尿病患者中,研究了AZD9567(一种新型口服、非甾体、选择性糖皮质激素受体调节剂)与强的松龙在血糖控制方面的差异作用机制。在这项随机、双盲、双向交叉研究(NCT04556760)中,参与者每天接受AZD9567 72 mg和强的松龙40 mg(队列1);或安慰剂和强的松龙,每日5mg(队列3)。治疗持续时间为3天,两次治疗之间有3周的洗脱期。在标准化膳食和持续血糖监测后评估血糖控制。结果在队列1中,从基线到第4天餐后葡萄糖漂移的变化,AZD9567和强的松龙之间存在显著差异(葡萄糖auc0 -4小时-4.54%;95% ci: -8.88, -0.01;p=0.049),但在队列2中没有(-5.77%;95% ci: -20.92, 12.29;p = 0.435)。在队列1中,AZD9567和强的松龙在餐后胰岛素和胰高血糖素分泌从基线到第4天的变化(p= 0.001和p=0.005)以及GLP-1反应从基线到第4天的变化(p=0.022)也有显著差异。AZD9567和强的松龙24小时血糖控制在队列1 (-1.507 mmol/L;95% ci: -2.0820, -0.9314;p<0.001),队列2 (-1.110 mmol/L;95% ci -1.7257, -0.4941;术中,0.001)。结论与强的松龙相比,AZD9567可显著降低治疗性高血糖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effect of AZD9567 versus prednisolone on glycemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus: Results from a Phase 2a clinical trial
Aims Corticosteroids are the treatment of choice for many inflammatory diseases, but often lead to adverse effects, including hyperglycemia. This study investigated the mechanisms driving differential effects on glucose control for AZD9567, a novel oral, non-steroidal, selective glucocorticoid receptor modulator, versus prednisolone in 46 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods In this randomized, double-blind, 2-way cross-over study (NCT04556760), participants received either AZD9567 72 mg and prednisolone 40 mg daily (Cohort 1); AZD9567 40 mg and prednisolone 20 mg daily (Cohort 2); or placebo and prednisolone 5 mg daily (Cohort 3). Treatment duration was 3 days with a 3-week washout between treatment periods. Glycemic control was assessed after a standardized meal and with continuous glucose monitoring. Results A significant difference between AZD9567 and prednisolone in favour of AZD9567 was observed for the change from baseline to Day 4 glucose excursions post-meal in Cohort 1 (glucose AUC0-4h -4.54%; 95% CI: -8.88, -0.01; p=0.049), but not in Cohort 2 (-5.77%; 95% CI: -20.92, 12.29; p=0.435). In Cohort 1, significant differences between AZD9567 and prednisolone were also seen for the change from baseline to Day 4 in insulin and glucagon secretion post-meal (p<0.001 and p=0.005, respectively), and change from baseline to Day 4 in GLP-1 response (p=0.022). Significant differences between AZD9567 and prednisolone for 24-hour glucose control were observed for both Cohort 1 (-1.507 mmol/L; 95% CI: -2.0820, -0.9314; p<0.001), and Cohort 2 (-1.110 mmol/L; 95% CI -1.7257, -0.4941; p<0.001). Conclusions AZD9567 significantly reduced treatment-induced hyperglycemia compared with prednisolone.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Heart rate variability biofeedback acutely improves attentional control only in highly stressed individuals Relationship between microRNA-9 and breast cancer The impact of land use change on the diversity and emergence of fungal pathogens Severe seasonal shifts in tropical insect ephemerality drive bat foraging effort Using Circulating MicroRNAs as Noninvasive Cancer Biomarkers in Breast Cancer is a Cutting-Edge Application of MicroRNA Profiling Technology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1