德国立法者的民主观念与过程偏好:一项新调查的结果

IF 1.9 3区 社会学 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE German Politics Pub Date : 2023-11-14 DOI:10.1080/09644008.2023.2279183
Leonard Häfner, Claudia Landwehr, Lea Stallbaum
{"title":"德国立法者的民主观念与过程偏好:一项新调查的结果","authors":"Leonard Häfner, Claudia Landwehr, Lea Stallbaum","doi":"10.1080/09644008.2023.2279183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTDemocracy’s resilience arguably depends on political elites’ loyalty to the political system. How do elected representatives understand democracy and their own role in it? We present results of a survey conducted among German legislators in state parliaments and the Bundestag in 2022. We start by mapping the scope and content of consensus and dissent where principles of democracy and their institutionalisation are concerned and go on to hypothesise that congruence between one’s own conceptions of democracy and established institutions and practices is generally higher among established and government parties’ representatives but also dependent on ideological inclinations. Our results are overall reassuring, showing a relatively low level of polarisation in attitudes to democracy, and have implications for the study of political elites, for diagnoses of political polarisation in Germany and for the possibility and feasibility of institutional reform. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe authors thank Miriam Gill and Paul Weingärtner for excellent research assistance and Sven Hillen as well as two anonymous reviewers for German Politics for helpful comments on earlier versions of this paper.DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENTThe data that support the findings of this study are openly available in: https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/GUVA5P.DISCLOSURE STATEMENTNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).SUPPLEMENTAL DATA AND RESEARCH MATERIALSSupplemental data for this article can be accessed on the Taylor & Francis website, https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2023.2279183DATA AVAILABILITY AND DEPOSITIONReplication files will be made available on the authors’ website.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the DFG [grant number LA 2388/9-1].Notes on contributorsLeonard HäfnerLeonard Häfner is doctoral researcher in the DFG-funded project ‘Conceptions of Democracy among Political Elites and Citizens’ at JGU Mainz.Claudia Landwehr has been professor of political theory and public policy at JGU Mainz since 2011. She works on deliberative theories of democracy and political representation and studies citizen and elite conceptions of democracy and process preferences. She has recently published ‘Contested Representation. Challenges, Shortcomings and Reforms’ (Cambridge University Press 2022, edited with Thomas Saalfeld and Armin Schäfer).Claudia LandwehrLea Stallbaum is doctoral researcher in the DFG-funded project ‘Conceptions of Democracy among Political Elites and Citizens’ at JGU Mainz.","PeriodicalId":46640,"journal":{"name":"German Politics","volume":"5 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"German Legislators’ Conceptions of Democracy and Process Preferences: Results from a New Survey\",\"authors\":\"Leonard Häfner, Claudia Landwehr, Lea Stallbaum\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09644008.2023.2279183\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTDemocracy’s resilience arguably depends on political elites’ loyalty to the political system. How do elected representatives understand democracy and their own role in it? We present results of a survey conducted among German legislators in state parliaments and the Bundestag in 2022. We start by mapping the scope and content of consensus and dissent where principles of democracy and their institutionalisation are concerned and go on to hypothesise that congruence between one’s own conceptions of democracy and established institutions and practices is generally higher among established and government parties’ representatives but also dependent on ideological inclinations. Our results are overall reassuring, showing a relatively low level of polarisation in attitudes to democracy, and have implications for the study of political elites, for diagnoses of political polarisation in Germany and for the possibility and feasibility of institutional reform. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe authors thank Miriam Gill and Paul Weingärtner for excellent research assistance and Sven Hillen as well as two anonymous reviewers for German Politics for helpful comments on earlier versions of this paper.DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENTThe data that support the findings of this study are openly available in: https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/GUVA5P.DISCLOSURE STATEMENTNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).SUPPLEMENTAL DATA AND RESEARCH MATERIALSSupplemental data for this article can be accessed on the Taylor & Francis website, https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2023.2279183DATA AVAILABILITY AND DEPOSITIONReplication files will be made available on the authors’ website.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the DFG [grant number LA 2388/9-1].Notes on contributorsLeonard HäfnerLeonard Häfner is doctoral researcher in the DFG-funded project ‘Conceptions of Democracy among Political Elites and Citizens’ at JGU Mainz.Claudia Landwehr has been professor of political theory and public policy at JGU Mainz since 2011. She works on deliberative theories of democracy and political representation and studies citizen and elite conceptions of democracy and process preferences. She has recently published ‘Contested Representation. Challenges, Shortcomings and Reforms’ (Cambridge University Press 2022, edited with Thomas Saalfeld and Armin Schäfer).Claudia LandwehrLea Stallbaum is doctoral researcher in the DFG-funded project ‘Conceptions of Democracy among Political Elites and Citizens’ at JGU Mainz.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46640,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"German Politics\",\"volume\":\"5 6\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"German Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2023.2279183\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"German Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2023.2279183","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要民主的恢复力取决于政治精英对政治制度的忠诚。当选代表如何理解民主以及他们自己在民主中的作用?我们展示了2022年在州议会和联邦议院的德国立法者中进行的一项调查的结果。我们首先绘制民主原则及其制度化所涉及的共识和异议的范围和内容,然后假设一个人自己的民主概念与既定制度和实践之间的一致性通常在既定和政府政党的代表中更高,但也依赖于意识形态倾向。我们的结果总体上令人放心,显示出对民主态度的两极分化程度相对较低,这对政治精英的研究、对德国政治两极分化的诊断以及制度改革的可能性和可行性都有启示。作者感谢Miriam Gill和Paul Weingärtner出色的研究协助,Sven Hillen以及德国政治杂志的两位匿名审稿人对本文早期版本的有益评论。数据可用性声明支持本研究结果的数据可在:https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/GUVA5P.DISCLOSURE公开获取声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。补充数据和研究材料本文的补充数据可以在Taylor & Francis网站上访问,https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2023.2279183DATA可用性和沉积复制文件将在作者的网站上提供。本研究得到了DFG的支持[批准号LA 2388/9-1]。作者简介leonard HäfnerLeonard Häfner是德国联邦政府资助的“政治精英和公民之间的民主概念”项目的博士研究员。Claudia Landwehr自2011年以来一直担任JGU美因茨大学政治理论和公共政策教授。她研究民主和政治代表的协商理论,研究公民和精英对民主和过程偏好的概念。她最近出版了《有争议的代表权》一书。挑战,缺点和改革(剑桥大学出版社2022年,编辑与托马斯萨尔菲尔德和阿明Schäfer)。Claudia LandwehrLea Stallbaum是德国联邦政府资助的项目“政治精英和公民中的民主概念”的博士研究员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
German Legislators’ Conceptions of Democracy and Process Preferences: Results from a New Survey
ABSTRACTDemocracy’s resilience arguably depends on political elites’ loyalty to the political system. How do elected representatives understand democracy and their own role in it? We present results of a survey conducted among German legislators in state parliaments and the Bundestag in 2022. We start by mapping the scope and content of consensus and dissent where principles of democracy and their institutionalisation are concerned and go on to hypothesise that congruence between one’s own conceptions of democracy and established institutions and practices is generally higher among established and government parties’ representatives but also dependent on ideological inclinations. Our results are overall reassuring, showing a relatively low level of polarisation in attitudes to democracy, and have implications for the study of political elites, for diagnoses of political polarisation in Germany and for the possibility and feasibility of institutional reform. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe authors thank Miriam Gill and Paul Weingärtner for excellent research assistance and Sven Hillen as well as two anonymous reviewers for German Politics for helpful comments on earlier versions of this paper.DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENTThe data that support the findings of this study are openly available in: https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/GUVA5P.DISCLOSURE STATEMENTNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).SUPPLEMENTAL DATA AND RESEARCH MATERIALSSupplemental data for this article can be accessed on the Taylor & Francis website, https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2023.2279183DATA AVAILABILITY AND DEPOSITIONReplication files will be made available on the authors’ website.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the DFG [grant number LA 2388/9-1].Notes on contributorsLeonard HäfnerLeonard Häfner is doctoral researcher in the DFG-funded project ‘Conceptions of Democracy among Political Elites and Citizens’ at JGU Mainz.Claudia Landwehr has been professor of political theory and public policy at JGU Mainz since 2011. She works on deliberative theories of democracy and political representation and studies citizen and elite conceptions of democracy and process preferences. She has recently published ‘Contested Representation. Challenges, Shortcomings and Reforms’ (Cambridge University Press 2022, edited with Thomas Saalfeld and Armin Schäfer).Claudia LandwehrLea Stallbaum is doctoral researcher in the DFG-funded project ‘Conceptions of Democracy among Political Elites and Citizens’ at JGU Mainz.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
German Politics
German Politics POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
Against All Odds? A Discourse Network Analysis of the Political Debate About the German Passenger Car Toll Act German Legislators’ Conceptions of Democracy and Process Preferences: Results from a New Survey Germany’s Triangular Relations with the United States and China in the Era of the Zeitenwende The Effects of Federalism, Corporatism and Legislative Power on Health System Transformation in Germany Erythrocyte fatty acid aberrations in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Correlation with disease duration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1