探索诗歌的力量(忘记过去的力量?)

IF 0.1 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY CANADIAN REVIEW OF AMERICAN STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.3138/cras-2023-008
Lisa Narbeshuber
{"title":"探索诗歌的力量(忘记过去的力量?)","authors":"Lisa Narbeshuber","doi":"10.3138/cras-2023-008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The review article examines three innovative books: Poetry Unbound by Mike Chaser looks at how to account for poetry in the context of past and contemporary social media, while Why Poetry by Matthew Zapruder and Don’t Read Poetry by Stephanie Burt look at how and why to read poetry in our contemporary culture. The article begins with a discussion of the evolution of poetry from the 1910s when poetry was subject to dramatic technological changes and the rise of radical art movements, attracting new audiences. As poetry became more open-ended, intertextual, playful, and exploratory, the question of what constitutes (good or bad) poetry came to the fore. In their collective defence of poetry, Chaser, Zapruder, and Burt champion poetry, whether accessible or challenging, as popular, relevant, and socially beneficial. Though the three books’ readings of poetry and the examples used are often conventional, in a sense unconscious of their radical forebears, each book in different ways asserts the ongoing presence and power of poetry.","PeriodicalId":53953,"journal":{"name":"CANADIAN REVIEW OF AMERICAN STUDIES","volume":"140 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quests for the Power of the Poem (Forgetting the Power of the Past?)\",\"authors\":\"Lisa Narbeshuber\",\"doi\":\"10.3138/cras-2023-008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The review article examines three innovative books: Poetry Unbound by Mike Chaser looks at how to account for poetry in the context of past and contemporary social media, while Why Poetry by Matthew Zapruder and Don’t Read Poetry by Stephanie Burt look at how and why to read poetry in our contemporary culture. The article begins with a discussion of the evolution of poetry from the 1910s when poetry was subject to dramatic technological changes and the rise of radical art movements, attracting new audiences. As poetry became more open-ended, intertextual, playful, and exploratory, the question of what constitutes (good or bad) poetry came to the fore. In their collective defence of poetry, Chaser, Zapruder, and Burt champion poetry, whether accessible or challenging, as popular, relevant, and socially beneficial. Though the three books’ readings of poetry and the examples used are often conventional, in a sense unconscious of their radical forebears, each book in different ways asserts the ongoing presence and power of poetry.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CANADIAN REVIEW OF AMERICAN STUDIES\",\"volume\":\"140 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CANADIAN REVIEW OF AMERICAN STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3138/cras-2023-008\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CANADIAN REVIEW OF AMERICAN STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/cras-2023-008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇评论文章考察了三本具有创新意义的书籍:迈克·蔡泽的《解诗》着眼于如何在过去和当代社交媒体的背景下解释诗歌,马修·泽普鲁德的《为什么要读诗》和斯蒂芬妮·伯特的《不要读诗》着眼于在当代文化中如何以及为什么要读诗。本文首先讨论了20世纪10年代以来诗歌的演变,当时诗歌受到戏剧性的技术变革和激进艺术运动的兴起,吸引了新的受众。随着诗歌变得更加开放、互文、俏皮和探索性,什么构成(好或坏)诗歌的问题就出现了。在他们对诗歌的集体辩护中,查瑟、泽普鲁德和伯特为诗歌辩护,无论诗歌是通俗易懂的还是具有挑战性的,都是受欢迎的、相关的、有益于社会的。虽然这三本书的诗歌阅读和使用的例子通常是传统的,在某种程度上没有意识到它们的激进祖先,但每本书都以不同的方式断言诗歌的持续存在和力量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quests for the Power of the Poem (Forgetting the Power of the Past?)
The review article examines three innovative books: Poetry Unbound by Mike Chaser looks at how to account for poetry in the context of past and contemporary social media, while Why Poetry by Matthew Zapruder and Don’t Read Poetry by Stephanie Burt look at how and why to read poetry in our contemporary culture. The article begins with a discussion of the evolution of poetry from the 1910s when poetry was subject to dramatic technological changes and the rise of radical art movements, attracting new audiences. As poetry became more open-ended, intertextual, playful, and exploratory, the question of what constitutes (good or bad) poetry came to the fore. In their collective defence of poetry, Chaser, Zapruder, and Burt champion poetry, whether accessible or challenging, as popular, relevant, and socially beneficial. Though the three books’ readings of poetry and the examples used are often conventional, in a sense unconscious of their radical forebears, each book in different ways asserts the ongoing presence and power of poetry.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CANADIAN REVIEW OF AMERICAN STUDIES
CANADIAN REVIEW OF AMERICAN STUDIES HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
Why Are Public Attitudes towards Immigration in Canada Becoming Increasingly Positive? Exploring the Factors behind the Changes in Attitudes towards Immigration (1998–2021) The Spectacle and Reification of Game of Thrones Ecology, Natural History, and Ecospatiality in American Literature Missing the Boat: Narrative Artistry in Hawthorne’s “My Kinsman, Major Molineux” and James’s The Ambassadors “The American Sentence”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1