Maria Elena Toubes-Navarro, Francisco Gude-Sampedro, José Manuel Álvarez-Dobaño, Francisco Reyes-Santias, Carlos Rábade-Castedo, Carlota Rodríguez-García, Óscar Lado-Baleato, Raquel Lago-Fidalgo, Noelia Sánchez-Martínez, Jorge Ricoy-Gabaldón, Ana Casal-Mouriño, Romina Abelleira-Paris, Vanessa Riveiro-Blanco, Carlos Zamarrón-Sanz, Nuria Rodríguez-Núñez, Adriana Lama-López, Lucía Ferreiro-Fernández, Luis Valdés-Cuadrado
{"title":"肺康复计划减少慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者住院:一项成本效益研究","authors":"Maria Elena Toubes-Navarro, Francisco Gude-Sampedro, José Manuel Álvarez-Dobaño, Francisco Reyes-Santias, Carlos Rábade-Castedo, Carlota Rodríguez-García, Óscar Lado-Baleato, Raquel Lago-Fidalgo, Noelia Sánchez-Martínez, Jorge Ricoy-Gabaldón, Ana Casal-Mouriño, Romina Abelleira-Paris, Vanessa Riveiro-Blanco, Carlos Zamarrón-Sanz, Nuria Rodríguez-Núñez, Adriana Lama-López, Lucía Ferreiro-Fernández, Luis Valdés-Cuadrado","doi":"10.4103/atm.atm_70_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: BACKGROUND: Although pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is recommended in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), there is a scarcity of data demonstrating the cost-effectiveness and effectiveness of PR in reducing exacerbations. METHODS: A quasi-experimental study in 200 patients with COPD was conducted to determine the number of exacerbations 1 year before and after their participation in a PR program. Quality of life was measured using the COPD assessment test and EuroQol-5D. The costs of the program and exacerbations were assessed the year before and after participation in the PR program. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was estimated in terms of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). RESULTS: The number of admissions, length of hospital stay, and admissions to the emergency department decreased after participation in the PR program by 48.2%, 46.6%, and 42.5%, respectively ( P < 0.001 for all). Results on quality of life tests improved significantly ( P < 0.001 for the two tests). The cost of PR per patient and the cost of pre-PR and post-PR exacerbations were €1867.7 and €7895.2 and €4201.9, respectively. The PR resulted in a cost saving of €1826 (total, €365,200) per patient/year, and the gain in QALYs was+0.107. ICER was −€17,056. The total cost was <€20,000/QALY in 78% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: PR contributes to reducing the number of exacerbations in patients with COPD, thereby slowing clinical deterioration. In addition, it is cost-effective in terms of QALYs.","PeriodicalId":50760,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Thoracic Medicine","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A pulmonary rehabilitation program reduces hospitalizations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: A cost-effectiveness study\",\"authors\":\"Maria Elena Toubes-Navarro, Francisco Gude-Sampedro, José Manuel Álvarez-Dobaño, Francisco Reyes-Santias, Carlos Rábade-Castedo, Carlota Rodríguez-García, Óscar Lado-Baleato, Raquel Lago-Fidalgo, Noelia Sánchez-Martínez, Jorge Ricoy-Gabaldón, Ana Casal-Mouriño, Romina Abelleira-Paris, Vanessa Riveiro-Blanco, Carlos Zamarrón-Sanz, Nuria Rodríguez-Núñez, Adriana Lama-López, Lucía Ferreiro-Fernández, Luis Valdés-Cuadrado\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/atm.atm_70_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: BACKGROUND: Although pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is recommended in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), there is a scarcity of data demonstrating the cost-effectiveness and effectiveness of PR in reducing exacerbations. METHODS: A quasi-experimental study in 200 patients with COPD was conducted to determine the number of exacerbations 1 year before and after their participation in a PR program. Quality of life was measured using the COPD assessment test and EuroQol-5D. The costs of the program and exacerbations were assessed the year before and after participation in the PR program. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was estimated in terms of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). RESULTS: The number of admissions, length of hospital stay, and admissions to the emergency department decreased after participation in the PR program by 48.2%, 46.6%, and 42.5%, respectively ( P < 0.001 for all). Results on quality of life tests improved significantly ( P < 0.001 for the two tests). The cost of PR per patient and the cost of pre-PR and post-PR exacerbations were €1867.7 and €7895.2 and €4201.9, respectively. The PR resulted in a cost saving of €1826 (total, €365,200) per patient/year, and the gain in QALYs was+0.107. ICER was −€17,056. The total cost was <€20,000/QALY in 78% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: PR contributes to reducing the number of exacerbations in patients with COPD, thereby slowing clinical deterioration. In addition, it is cost-effective in terms of QALYs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Thoracic Medicine\",\"volume\":\"80 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Thoracic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/atm.atm_70_23\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Thoracic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/atm.atm_70_23","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
A pulmonary rehabilitation program reduces hospitalizations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: A cost-effectiveness study
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Although pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is recommended in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), there is a scarcity of data demonstrating the cost-effectiveness and effectiveness of PR in reducing exacerbations. METHODS: A quasi-experimental study in 200 patients with COPD was conducted to determine the number of exacerbations 1 year before and after their participation in a PR program. Quality of life was measured using the COPD assessment test and EuroQol-5D. The costs of the program and exacerbations were assessed the year before and after participation in the PR program. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was estimated in terms of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). RESULTS: The number of admissions, length of hospital stay, and admissions to the emergency department decreased after participation in the PR program by 48.2%, 46.6%, and 42.5%, respectively ( P < 0.001 for all). Results on quality of life tests improved significantly ( P < 0.001 for the two tests). The cost of PR per patient and the cost of pre-PR and post-PR exacerbations were €1867.7 and €7895.2 and €4201.9, respectively. The PR resulted in a cost saving of €1826 (total, €365,200) per patient/year, and the gain in QALYs was+0.107. ICER was −€17,056. The total cost was <€20,000/QALY in 78% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: PR contributes to reducing the number of exacerbations in patients with COPD, thereby slowing clinical deterioration. In addition, it is cost-effective in terms of QALYs.
期刊介绍:
The journal will cover studies related to multidisciplinary specialties of chest medicine, such as adult and pediatrics pulmonology, thoracic surgery, critical care medicine, respiratory care, transplantation, sleep medicine, related basic medical sciences, and more. The journal also features basic science, special reports, case reports, board review , and more. Editorials and communications to the editor that explore controversial issues and encourage further discussion by physicians dealing with chest medicine.