评估物流核心竞争力的英语水平要求:泰国EEC背景下初级物流人员的CEFR框架

Oranicha Buthphorm
{"title":"评估物流核心竞争力的英语水平要求:泰国EEC背景下初级物流人员的CEFR框架","authors":"Oranicha Buthphorm","doi":"10.48048/asi.2024.262134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"English is the most commonly spoken language for international communication across all industries, whereas logistics is one of the key differentiators in corporate strategy. Producing logistics graduates who go above and beyond the requirements of their chosen sector is one of the universities’ main objectives. The study’s objectives were to investigate the English proficiency problem and the English proficiency requirements for logistics core competencies (LCC) in the Eastern Economic Corridor (EEC). The quantitative research approach was selected, and a survey questionnaire was used based on four English skills, whereas the transportation, distribution, and logistics competency model, the association for operations management model, and the business logistics management framework were used as the basis for the survey, which is designed to collect the requirements of practitioners on the required skills for entry-level logisticians. 179 respondents from various EEC industry sectors responded. The results of the mean scores indicate that the primary issue is a deficiency in listening skills. Participants’ average English proficiency for logistics was B2, with 24 skill elements. The highest needs for C1 were in logistics rules and regulations and critical and analytical thinking. The results of this study can contribute significantly to logistics curriculum designers’ ability to supplement the traditional course with a crucial LCC. Future research is needed to clarify further the challenges and obstacles of developing the logistics English language skills of Thai logistics students towards CEFR B2 and C1.","PeriodicalId":43547,"journal":{"name":"SOJOURN-Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating English Proficiency Requirement for logistics core competency: CEFR framework for entry-level logisticians in Thailand’s EEC context\",\"authors\":\"Oranicha Buthphorm\",\"doi\":\"10.48048/asi.2024.262134\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"English is the most commonly spoken language for international communication across all industries, whereas logistics is one of the key differentiators in corporate strategy. Producing logistics graduates who go above and beyond the requirements of their chosen sector is one of the universities’ main objectives. The study’s objectives were to investigate the English proficiency problem and the English proficiency requirements for logistics core competencies (LCC) in the Eastern Economic Corridor (EEC). The quantitative research approach was selected, and a survey questionnaire was used based on four English skills, whereas the transportation, distribution, and logistics competency model, the association for operations management model, and the business logistics management framework were used as the basis for the survey, which is designed to collect the requirements of practitioners on the required skills for entry-level logisticians. 179 respondents from various EEC industry sectors responded. The results of the mean scores indicate that the primary issue is a deficiency in listening skills. Participants’ average English proficiency for logistics was B2, with 24 skill elements. The highest needs for C1 were in logistics rules and regulations and critical and analytical thinking. The results of this study can contribute significantly to logistics curriculum designers’ ability to supplement the traditional course with a crucial LCC. Future research is needed to clarify further the challenges and obstacles of developing the logistics English language skills of Thai logistics students towards CEFR B2 and C1.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SOJOURN-Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SOJOURN-Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48048/asi.2024.262134\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SOJOURN-Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48048/asi.2024.262134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

英语是所有行业国际交流中最常用的语言,而物流是企业战略中的关键差异化因素之一。培养能够超越所选行业要求的物流专业毕业生是大学的主要目标之一。本研究的目的是调查东部经济走廊(EEC)物流核心竞争力(LCC)的英语能力问题和英语能力要求。本研究采用定量研究方法,采用基于四项英语技能的调查问卷,以运输、配送和物流胜任力模型、运营管理协会模型和企业物流管理框架为基础,收集从业人员对初级物流人员所需技能的要求。来自欧共体各行业的179名受访者做出了回应。平均分数的结果表明,主要问题是听力技能的不足。参与者的平均物流英语水平为B2,包含24个技能要素。对C1要求最高的是物流规章制度和批判性分析思维。本研究的结果对物流课程设计者以重要的LCC补充传统课程的能力有显著的贡献。未来的研究需要进一步阐明泰国物流专业学生向CEFR B2和C1发展物流英语语言技能的挑战和障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating English Proficiency Requirement for logistics core competency: CEFR framework for entry-level logisticians in Thailand’s EEC context
English is the most commonly spoken language for international communication across all industries, whereas logistics is one of the key differentiators in corporate strategy. Producing logistics graduates who go above and beyond the requirements of their chosen sector is one of the universities’ main objectives. The study’s objectives were to investigate the English proficiency problem and the English proficiency requirements for logistics core competencies (LCC) in the Eastern Economic Corridor (EEC). The quantitative research approach was selected, and a survey questionnaire was used based on four English skills, whereas the transportation, distribution, and logistics competency model, the association for operations management model, and the business logistics management framework were used as the basis for the survey, which is designed to collect the requirements of practitioners on the required skills for entry-level logisticians. 179 respondents from various EEC industry sectors responded. The results of the mean scores indicate that the primary issue is a deficiency in listening skills. Participants’ average English proficiency for logistics was B2, with 24 skill elements. The highest needs for C1 were in logistics rules and regulations and critical and analytical thinking. The results of this study can contribute significantly to logistics curriculum designers’ ability to supplement the traditional course with a crucial LCC. Future research is needed to clarify further the challenges and obstacles of developing the logistics English language skills of Thai logistics students towards CEFR B2 and C1.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Innovative Application of Guangdong Chaoyang Paper Cutting Elements in Cheongsam Design Extension Model of Administration and Management for Business of Community Enterprise The Application of Place-Based Education in Social Studies of Grade 5 Bhutanese Students The Correlation between Hostel Brand Equity Dimensions in Thailand Evaluating English Proficiency Requirement for logistics core competency: CEFR framework for entry-level logisticians in Thailand’s EEC context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1