用生成式机器学习模型正则化逆问题

IF 1.3 4区 数学 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision Pub Date : 2023-10-09 DOI:10.1007/s10851-023-01162-x
Margaret Duff, Neill D. F. Campbell, Matthias J. Ehrhardt
{"title":"用生成式机器学习模型正则化逆问题","authors":"Margaret Duff, Neill D. F. Campbell, Matthias J. Ehrhardt","doi":"10.1007/s10851-023-01162-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Deep neural network approaches to inverse imaging problems have produced impressive results in the last few years. In this survey paper, we consider the use of generative models in a variational regularisation approach to inverse problems. The considered regularisers penalise images that are far from the range of a generative model that has learned to produce images similar to a training dataset. We name this family generative regularisers . The success of generative regularisers depends on the quality of the generative model and so we propose a set of desired criteria to assess generative models and guide future research. In our numerical experiments, we evaluate three common generative models, autoencoders, variational autoencoders and generative adversarial networks, against our desired criteria. We also test three different generative regularisers on the inverse problems of deblurring, deconvolution, and tomography. We show that restricting solutions of the inverse problem to lie exactly in the range of a generative model can give good results but that allowing small deviations from the range of the generator produces more consistent results. Finally, we discuss future directions and open problems in the field.","PeriodicalId":16196,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regularising Inverse Problems with Generative Machine Learning Models\",\"authors\":\"Margaret Duff, Neill D. F. Campbell, Matthias J. Ehrhardt\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10851-023-01162-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Deep neural network approaches to inverse imaging problems have produced impressive results in the last few years. In this survey paper, we consider the use of generative models in a variational regularisation approach to inverse problems. The considered regularisers penalise images that are far from the range of a generative model that has learned to produce images similar to a training dataset. We name this family generative regularisers . The success of generative regularisers depends on the quality of the generative model and so we propose a set of desired criteria to assess generative models and guide future research. In our numerical experiments, we evaluate three common generative models, autoencoders, variational autoencoders and generative adversarial networks, against our desired criteria. We also test three different generative regularisers on the inverse problems of deblurring, deconvolution, and tomography. We show that restricting solutions of the inverse problem to lie exactly in the range of a generative model can give good results but that allowing small deviations from the range of the generator produces more consistent results. Finally, we discuss future directions and open problems in the field.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16196,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10851-023-01162-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10851-023-01162-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

在过去的几年中,深度神经网络方法在反成像问题上取得了令人印象深刻的成果。在这篇调查论文中,我们考虑在变分正则化方法中使用生成模型来解决反问题。考虑的正则化器会惩罚那些远离生成模型范围的图像,生成模型已经学会了生成类似于训练数据集的图像。我们称这个家族为生成规则子。生成规则器的成功取决于生成模型的质量,因此我们提出了一套期望的标准来评估生成模型并指导未来的研究。在我们的数值实验中,我们根据我们的期望标准评估了三种常见的生成模型,自动编码器,变分自编码器和生成对抗网络。我们还在去模糊、反卷积和断层扫描的逆问题上测试了三种不同的生成正则子。我们证明,将反问题的解限制在生成模型的范围内可以得到很好的结果,但允许与生成模型的范围有较小的偏差会产生更一致的结果。最后,讨论了该领域的发展方向和有待解决的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Regularising Inverse Problems with Generative Machine Learning Models
Abstract Deep neural network approaches to inverse imaging problems have produced impressive results in the last few years. In this survey paper, we consider the use of generative models in a variational regularisation approach to inverse problems. The considered regularisers penalise images that are far from the range of a generative model that has learned to produce images similar to a training dataset. We name this family generative regularisers . The success of generative regularisers depends on the quality of the generative model and so we propose a set of desired criteria to assess generative models and guide future research. In our numerical experiments, we evaluate three common generative models, autoencoders, variational autoencoders and generative adversarial networks, against our desired criteria. We also test three different generative regularisers on the inverse problems of deblurring, deconvolution, and tomography. We show that restricting solutions of the inverse problem to lie exactly in the range of a generative model can give good results but that allowing small deviations from the range of the generator produces more consistent results. Finally, we discuss future directions and open problems in the field.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision
Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision is a technical journal publishing important new developments in mathematical imaging. The journal publishes research articles, invited papers, and expository articles. Current developments in new image processing hardware, the advent of multisensor data fusion, and rapid advances in vision research have led to an explosive growth in the interdisciplinary field of imaging science. This growth has resulted in the development of highly sophisticated mathematical models and theories. The journal emphasizes the role of mathematics as a rigorous basis for imaging science. This provides a sound alternative to present journals in this area. Contributions are judged on the basis of mathematical content. Articles may be physically speculative but need to be mathematically sound. Emphasis is placed on innovative or established mathematical techniques applied to vision and imaging problems in a novel way, as well as new developments and problems in mathematics arising from these applications. The scope of the journal includes: computational models of vision; imaging algebra and mathematical morphology mathematical methods in reconstruction, compactification, and coding filter theory probabilistic, statistical, geometric, topological, and fractal techniques and models in imaging science inverse optics wave theory. Specific application areas of interest include, but are not limited to: all aspects of image formation and representation medical, biological, industrial, geophysical, astronomical and military imaging image analysis and image understanding parallel and distributed computing computer vision architecture design.
期刊最新文献
Mathematical Morphology on Directional Data Mixing Support Detection-Based Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers for Sparse Hyperspectral Image Unmixing Inferring Object Boundaries and Their Roughness with Uncertainty Quantification A Graph Multi-separator Problem for Image Segmentation Parallelly Sliced Optimal Transport on Spheres and on the Rotation Group
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1