衡量网络欺凌幸存者的宽恕程度

Imam Setyawan
{"title":"衡量网络欺凌幸存者的宽恕程度","authors":"Imam Setyawan","doi":"10.14710/empati.2023.39379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to see an overview of cyberbullying survivors' forgiveness in post-pandemic life. This research uses a quantitative descriptive approach. The research subjects were obtained through a purposive sampling technique, with characteristics, students who are cyberbullying survivors, with an age range of 18-21 years. Screening is carried out with a cyberbullying questionnaire containing questions related to self-identity, types of cyberbullying (based on Willard's theory namely, flaming, harassment, denigration, impersonation, outing & trickery, exclusion, and cyberstalking), repeated experiences of cyberbullying, and perpetrators of cyberbullying, to ensure that the subject is truly are truly survivors of one or more types of cyberbullying. The research subjects were 109 students who were obtained from the screening results and statements of willingness. Data collection uses a scale of forgiveness (25 items, α = .931). Data analysis was performed using the Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26.0 program. The results showed that the subject's forgiveness was in the medium category, with a total of 62 people (57%), and the empirical mean was 58.16, within the medium category range (50 – 75). These results indicate that the forgiveness of cyberbullying survivors is not optimal, there are still 32 people (29%), in the low category. This condition occurs because most of the subjects are dealing with more than one type of cyberbullying, as well as the anonymity factor of the perpetrators of cyberbullying, most of whom come from strangers. No significant differences were found between male and female survivors' forgiveness.","PeriodicalId":395599,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal EMPATI","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MENAKAR PEMAAFAN PADA PENYINTAS CYBERBULLYING\",\"authors\":\"Imam Setyawan\",\"doi\":\"10.14710/empati.2023.39379\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study is to see an overview of cyberbullying survivors' forgiveness in post-pandemic life. This research uses a quantitative descriptive approach. The research subjects were obtained through a purposive sampling technique, with characteristics, students who are cyberbullying survivors, with an age range of 18-21 years. Screening is carried out with a cyberbullying questionnaire containing questions related to self-identity, types of cyberbullying (based on Willard's theory namely, flaming, harassment, denigration, impersonation, outing & trickery, exclusion, and cyberstalking), repeated experiences of cyberbullying, and perpetrators of cyberbullying, to ensure that the subject is truly are truly survivors of one or more types of cyberbullying. The research subjects were 109 students who were obtained from the screening results and statements of willingness. Data collection uses a scale of forgiveness (25 items, α = .931). Data analysis was performed using the Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26.0 program. The results showed that the subject's forgiveness was in the medium category, with a total of 62 people (57%), and the empirical mean was 58.16, within the medium category range (50 – 75). These results indicate that the forgiveness of cyberbullying survivors is not optimal, there are still 32 people (29%), in the low category. This condition occurs because most of the subjects are dealing with more than one type of cyberbullying, as well as the anonymity factor of the perpetrators of cyberbullying, most of whom come from strangers. No significant differences were found between male and female survivors' forgiveness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":395599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal EMPATI\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal EMPATI\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14710/empati.2023.39379\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal EMPATI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14710/empati.2023.39379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是了解网络欺凌幸存者在流行病后生活中的宽恕概况。本研究采用定量描述方法。研究对象采用有目的抽样方法,以网络欺凌幸存者学生为特征,年龄在18-21岁之间。通过网络欺凌问卷进行筛选,问卷中包含以下问题:自我认同、网络欺凌类型(基于Willard的理论,即:焚烧、骚扰、诋毁、模仿、郊游;欺骗,排斥和网络跟踪),反复经历网络欺凌,以及网络欺凌的肇事者,以确保主体是真正的是一种或多种类型的网络欺凌的真正幸存者。研究对象为109名通过筛选结果和意愿陈述获得的学生。数据收集使用宽恕量表(25项,α = .931)。数据分析使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS) 26.0版程序进行。结果显示,被试的宽恕处于中等范畴,共62人(57%),经验平均值为58.16,处于中等范畴范围(50 - 75)。这些结果表明,网络欺凌幸存者的宽恕并不是最优的,仍有32人(29%)处于低类别。之所以会出现这种情况,是因为大多数被试都在处理不止一种类型的网络欺凌,以及网络欺凌施暴者的匿名性因素,他们大多来自陌生人。男性和女性幸存者的宽恕程度没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MENAKAR PEMAAFAN PADA PENYINTAS CYBERBULLYING
The purpose of this study is to see an overview of cyberbullying survivors' forgiveness in post-pandemic life. This research uses a quantitative descriptive approach. The research subjects were obtained through a purposive sampling technique, with characteristics, students who are cyberbullying survivors, with an age range of 18-21 years. Screening is carried out with a cyberbullying questionnaire containing questions related to self-identity, types of cyberbullying (based on Willard's theory namely, flaming, harassment, denigration, impersonation, outing & trickery, exclusion, and cyberstalking), repeated experiences of cyberbullying, and perpetrators of cyberbullying, to ensure that the subject is truly are truly survivors of one or more types of cyberbullying. The research subjects were 109 students who were obtained from the screening results and statements of willingness. Data collection uses a scale of forgiveness (25 items, α = .931). Data analysis was performed using the Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26.0 program. The results showed that the subject's forgiveness was in the medium category, with a total of 62 people (57%), and the empirical mean was 58.16, within the medium category range (50 – 75). These results indicate that the forgiveness of cyberbullying survivors is not optimal, there are still 32 people (29%), in the low category. This condition occurs because most of the subjects are dealing with more than one type of cyberbullying, as well as the anonymity factor of the perpetrators of cyberbullying, most of whom come from strangers. No significant differences were found between male and female survivors' forgiveness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SELF REGULATION DALAM MENINGKATKAN MOTIVASI BELAJAR PESERTA DIDIK KONTRIBUSI SOCIAL SUPPORT TERHADAP TINGKAT STRES AKADEMIK PADA MAHASISWA PSIKOLOGI BUKITTINGGI HUBUNGAN ANTARA CUSTOMER ENGAGEMENT DENGAN KEPERCAYAAN MEREK FASHION DARI UKM PADA MAHASISWA PSIKOLOGI UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO SEMARANG HUBUNGAN KECERDASAN EMOSI DENGAN MOTIVASI BELAJAR PADA SISWA DI SMP NEGERI 8 BUKITTINGGI STUDI KUALITATIF: INTENSI MENETAP ATAU BERPINDAH KERJA PADA KARYAWAN
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1