罗哌卡因在硬膜外麻醉中的应用。剂量反应关系及与布比卡因的比较[j]。

IF 1.9 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Regional-Anaesthesie Pub Date : 1990-05-01
W Wahedi, H Nolte, P Witte
{"title":"罗哌卡因在硬膜外麻醉中的应用。剂量反应关系及与布比卡因的比较[j]。","authors":"W Wahedi,&nbsp;H Nolte,&nbsp;P Witte","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>Ropivacaine is a new long-acting local anesthetic with a pharmacodynamic profile resembling that of bupivacaine; in addition, ropivacaine has been shown to be less cardiotoxic than bupivacaine in dogs and pigs. To test the dose-response relationship of ropivacaine 0.75% (epinephrine 1:200,000) given epidurally, 47 patients were divided into three groups; the first group received 15 ml (n = 16), the second 20 ml (n = 15), and the third group, 25 ml (n = 16) ropivacaine. Further, to compare bupivacaine 0.75%, bupivacaine 0.5% and ropivacaine 0.75% for epidural anesthesia, 15 ml bupivacaine 0.75% (n = 15) or bupivacaine 0.5% (n = 15) or ropivacaine 0.75% (n = 16) was given epidurally, all with epinephrine added to the solution (1:200,000).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 77 patients with ASA I or II were enrolled in a non-randomized open-label study. All patients were scheduled for varicose vein stripping. Male and female patients aged 18-70 and weighing 50-100 kg were included in the study. Patients were all placed in a sitting position and the epidural space was identified by the \"loss of resistance\" technique using a midline approach at the L 3/4 interspace; a test dose of 3 ml local anesthetic was then given, followed by injection of the remainder of the local anesthetic at the rate of 10 ml/min 1 min later. Following injection patients were immediately positioned supine. Upward and downward spread of analgesia were determined bilaterally by the pin-prick method, motor blockade was assessed by use of the Bromage scale following each determination of analgesia. Heart rate and blood pressure were obtained immediately before blockade and every 5 min until 3 h after the injection. RESULTS. The different volumes of ropivacaine 0.75% (15, 20, and 25 ml) brought about adequate analgesia in the sacral and lumbar regions in all patients. In the thoracic region T 6, T 5 and T 4 were reached. The time of onset of analgesia (segment L-1 in all three groups) was 6.4 +/- 2.9 min, 7.7 +/- 2.3 min, and 5.6 +/- 2.9 min for the 15-, 20- and 25-ml groups, respectively. The highest thoracic dermatome was reached after 20 +/- 6 min, 26 +/- 11 min, and 18 +/- 5 min. The duration of sensory anesthesia at the T 10 dermatomal level was 250 +/- 68, 249 +/- 77, and 278 +/- 51 min. Two-segment regression time was 160 +/- 67 min for bupivacaine 0.75%, 140 +/- 60 min for bupivacaine 0.5%, and 124 +/- 29 min for ropivacaine 0.75%. The total duration of sensory block was 303 +/- 58, 290 +/- 70, and 343 +/- 55 min for 15-, 20- and 25-ml groups, respectively. The degree of motor block achieved was 1.6, 1.8, and 2.0 (Bromage), respectively. Sensory anesthesia was considered adequate for surgery in all patients, and no signs of systemic toxicity were observed in any of the patients. The comparison of bupivacaine 0.75%, bupivacaine 0.5% and ropivacaine 0.75% revealed the same latency period of analgesia for bupivacaine 0.75% and ropivacaine 0.75%. This was shorter than for bupivacaine 0.5% (bupivacaine 0.75%: 6.4 +/- 2.1, bupivacaine 0.5%: 7.8 +/- 4...</p>","PeriodicalId":77604,"journal":{"name":"Regional-Anaesthesie","volume":"13 3","pages":"57-65"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"1990-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Ropivacaine in epidural anesthesia. Dose-response relationship and a comparison with bupivacaine].\",\"authors\":\"W Wahedi,&nbsp;H Nolte,&nbsp;P Witte\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>Ropivacaine is a new long-acting local anesthetic with a pharmacodynamic profile resembling that of bupivacaine; in addition, ropivacaine has been shown to be less cardiotoxic than bupivacaine in dogs and pigs. To test the dose-response relationship of ropivacaine 0.75% (epinephrine 1:200,000) given epidurally, 47 patients were divided into three groups; the first group received 15 ml (n = 16), the second 20 ml (n = 15), and the third group, 25 ml (n = 16) ropivacaine. Further, to compare bupivacaine 0.75%, bupivacaine 0.5% and ropivacaine 0.75% for epidural anesthesia, 15 ml bupivacaine 0.75% (n = 15) or bupivacaine 0.5% (n = 15) or ropivacaine 0.75% (n = 16) was given epidurally, all with epinephrine added to the solution (1:200,000).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 77 patients with ASA I or II were enrolled in a non-randomized open-label study. All patients were scheduled for varicose vein stripping. Male and female patients aged 18-70 and weighing 50-100 kg were included in the study. Patients were all placed in a sitting position and the epidural space was identified by the \\\"loss of resistance\\\" technique using a midline approach at the L 3/4 interspace; a test dose of 3 ml local anesthetic was then given, followed by injection of the remainder of the local anesthetic at the rate of 10 ml/min 1 min later. Following injection patients were immediately positioned supine. Upward and downward spread of analgesia were determined bilaterally by the pin-prick method, motor blockade was assessed by use of the Bromage scale following each determination of analgesia. Heart rate and blood pressure were obtained immediately before blockade and every 5 min until 3 h after the injection. RESULTS. The different volumes of ropivacaine 0.75% (15, 20, and 25 ml) brought about adequate analgesia in the sacral and lumbar regions in all patients. In the thoracic region T 6, T 5 and T 4 were reached. The time of onset of analgesia (segment L-1 in all three groups) was 6.4 +/- 2.9 min, 7.7 +/- 2.3 min, and 5.6 +/- 2.9 min for the 15-, 20- and 25-ml groups, respectively. The highest thoracic dermatome was reached after 20 +/- 6 min, 26 +/- 11 min, and 18 +/- 5 min. The duration of sensory anesthesia at the T 10 dermatomal level was 250 +/- 68, 249 +/- 77, and 278 +/- 51 min. Two-segment regression time was 160 +/- 67 min for bupivacaine 0.75%, 140 +/- 60 min for bupivacaine 0.5%, and 124 +/- 29 min for ropivacaine 0.75%. The total duration of sensory block was 303 +/- 58, 290 +/- 70, and 343 +/- 55 min for 15-, 20- and 25-ml groups, respectively. The degree of motor block achieved was 1.6, 1.8, and 2.0 (Bromage), respectively. Sensory anesthesia was considered adequate for surgery in all patients, and no signs of systemic toxicity were observed in any of the patients. The comparison of bupivacaine 0.75%, bupivacaine 0.5% and ropivacaine 0.75% revealed the same latency period of analgesia for bupivacaine 0.75% and ropivacaine 0.75%. This was shorter than for bupivacaine 0.5% (bupivacaine 0.75%: 6.4 +/- 2.1, bupivacaine 0.5%: 7.8 +/- 4...</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regional-Anaesthesie\",\"volume\":\"13 3\",\"pages\":\"57-65\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regional-Anaesthesie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional-Anaesthesie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

未标示:罗哌卡因是一种新的长效局部麻醉剂,其药效学特征与布比卡因相似;此外,在狗和猪身上,罗哌卡因已被证明比布比卡因的心脏毒性更小。为检验0.75%罗哌卡因(肾上腺素1:20万)硬膜外给药的量效关系,将47例患者分为3组;第一组15 ml (n = 16),第二组20 ml (n = 15),第三组25 ml (n = 16)罗哌卡因。为了比较0.75%布比卡因、0.5%布比卡因和0.75%罗比卡因的硬膜外麻醉效果,在硬膜外给予0.75%布比卡因15 ml (n = 15)或0.5%布比卡因15 ml (n = 15)或0.75%罗比卡因16 ml (n = 16),并在溶液中加入肾上腺素(1:20万)。方法:共有77例ASA I或II患者被纳入一项非随机开放标签研究。所有患者均计划行静脉曲张剥脱术。研究对象包括年龄在18-70岁、体重在50-100公斤的男女患者。所有患者均为坐位,硬膜外间隙采用“失去阻力”技术在l3 /4间隙采用中线入路识别;然后给予3 ml局部麻醉剂的试验剂量,然后在1分钟后以10 ml/min的速度注射剩余的局部麻醉剂。注射后患者立即仰卧位。双侧针刺法测定镇痛向上和向下的扩散,每次测定镇痛后用Bromage量表评定运动阻滞。阻断前立即测量心率和血压,每5分钟测量一次,直至注射后3小时。结果。不同体积的0.75%罗哌卡因(15、20和25 ml)在所有患者的骶骨和腰椎区域都有足够的镇痛作用。胸椎t6、t5、t4到达。15 ml、20 ml和25 ml组的镇痛起效时间(L-1段)分别为6.4 +/- 2.9 min、7.7 +/- 2.3 min和5.6 +/- 2.9 min。胸段皮段在20 +/- 6 min、26 +/- 11 min和18 +/- 5 min后达到最高。t10皮段感觉麻醉持续时间分别为250 +/- 68、249 +/- 77和278 +/- 51 min。布比卡因0.75%组两段回归时间分别为160 +/- 67 min、140 +/- 60 min和0.75%罗比卡因组124 +/- 29 min。15 ml、20 ml和25 ml组的感觉阻滞总持续时间分别为303 +/- 58分钟、290 +/- 70分钟和343 +/- 55分钟。运动阻滞程度分别为1.6、1.8和2.0 (Bromage)。感觉麻醉被认为是足够的手术在所有患者中,并没有观察到全身毒性的迹象在任何患者。对比0.75%布比卡因、0.5%布比卡因和0.75%罗比卡因,发现0.75%布比卡因和0.75%罗比卡因的镇痛潜伏期相同。这比0.5%布比卡因组短(0.75%布比卡因组:6.4 +/- 2.1,0.5%布比卡因组:7.8 +/- 4…)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Ropivacaine in epidural anesthesia. Dose-response relationship and a comparison with bupivacaine].

Unlabelled: Ropivacaine is a new long-acting local anesthetic with a pharmacodynamic profile resembling that of bupivacaine; in addition, ropivacaine has been shown to be less cardiotoxic than bupivacaine in dogs and pigs. To test the dose-response relationship of ropivacaine 0.75% (epinephrine 1:200,000) given epidurally, 47 patients were divided into three groups; the first group received 15 ml (n = 16), the second 20 ml (n = 15), and the third group, 25 ml (n = 16) ropivacaine. Further, to compare bupivacaine 0.75%, bupivacaine 0.5% and ropivacaine 0.75% for epidural anesthesia, 15 ml bupivacaine 0.75% (n = 15) or bupivacaine 0.5% (n = 15) or ropivacaine 0.75% (n = 16) was given epidurally, all with epinephrine added to the solution (1:200,000).

Methods: A total of 77 patients with ASA I or II were enrolled in a non-randomized open-label study. All patients were scheduled for varicose vein stripping. Male and female patients aged 18-70 and weighing 50-100 kg were included in the study. Patients were all placed in a sitting position and the epidural space was identified by the "loss of resistance" technique using a midline approach at the L 3/4 interspace; a test dose of 3 ml local anesthetic was then given, followed by injection of the remainder of the local anesthetic at the rate of 10 ml/min 1 min later. Following injection patients were immediately positioned supine. Upward and downward spread of analgesia were determined bilaterally by the pin-prick method, motor blockade was assessed by use of the Bromage scale following each determination of analgesia. Heart rate and blood pressure were obtained immediately before blockade and every 5 min until 3 h after the injection. RESULTS. The different volumes of ropivacaine 0.75% (15, 20, and 25 ml) brought about adequate analgesia in the sacral and lumbar regions in all patients. In the thoracic region T 6, T 5 and T 4 were reached. The time of onset of analgesia (segment L-1 in all three groups) was 6.4 +/- 2.9 min, 7.7 +/- 2.3 min, and 5.6 +/- 2.9 min for the 15-, 20- and 25-ml groups, respectively. The highest thoracic dermatome was reached after 20 +/- 6 min, 26 +/- 11 min, and 18 +/- 5 min. The duration of sensory anesthesia at the T 10 dermatomal level was 250 +/- 68, 249 +/- 77, and 278 +/- 51 min. Two-segment regression time was 160 +/- 67 min for bupivacaine 0.75%, 140 +/- 60 min for bupivacaine 0.5%, and 124 +/- 29 min for ropivacaine 0.75%. The total duration of sensory block was 303 +/- 58, 290 +/- 70, and 343 +/- 55 min for 15-, 20- and 25-ml groups, respectively. The degree of motor block achieved was 1.6, 1.8, and 2.0 (Bromage), respectively. Sensory anesthesia was considered adequate for surgery in all patients, and no signs of systemic toxicity were observed in any of the patients. The comparison of bupivacaine 0.75%, bupivacaine 0.5% and ropivacaine 0.75% revealed the same latency period of analgesia for bupivacaine 0.75% and ropivacaine 0.75%. This was shorter than for bupivacaine 0.5% (bupivacaine 0.75%: 6.4 +/- 2.1, bupivacaine 0.5%: 7.8 +/- 4...

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[An epidural spinal abscess as a lethal complication of peridural anesthesia]. [Knotting of a peridural catheter]. [A simple technique for estimating the level of analgesia in regional anesthesia]. [CSE--the combination of spinal and epidural anesthesia]. [Comments on the paper by R. Schürg et al. Maternal and neonatal plasma concentrations of bupivacaine during peridural anesthesia for cesarean section].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1