{"title":"在高等教育学习成果研究中应用可变和以人为本的方法","authors":"Ella Anghel, Henry I. Braun, Audry A. Friedman","doi":"10.1080/03057240.2023.2252615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTMany believe that higher education contributes to students’ joint cognitive and non-cognitive development. However, relevant empirical evidence of that is scarce. Employing a sample of 348 college students, the present study explored the relationships among a range of outcomes using both a variable- and a person-centered approach. We found that a sense of purpose, strength of principles, and moral agency were positively associated. However, cognitive and non-cognitive outcomes were only weakly correlated. We also found that most students had either high or low scores in all of the measured outcomes, but some had non-uniform profiles. These results suggest that colleges should not assume that cognitive and non-cognitive developments are strongly related. College students likely need differentiated instruction and support, depending on their individual backgrounds, interests, and levels of the target constructs.KEYWORDS: Higher educationmoral judgment developmentcognitive developmentlatent profile analysis AcknowledgmentsWe would like to thank Andres Castro Samayoa, Chris Constas, Kerry Cronin, Gabrielle Thome, and the instructors of the Perspectives program at Boston College for their assistance with data collection.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementData will be made readily available upon request for research purposes.Notes1. One group of students from which data were collected was not asked to provide age, see below.2. The EHD students’ CT scores were also reported elsewhere (Anghel et al., Citation2021).Additional informationFundingFunding was provided by an Ignite grant through Boston College.Notes on contributorsElla AnghelElla Anghel recently earned her Ph.D. from the Department of Measurement, Evaluation, Statistics, and Assessment at the Lynch School of Education and Human Development, Boston College. Her current research focuses on technology-enhanced assessment and learning.Henry I. BraunHenry I. Braun is the Boisi Professor of Education and Public Policy at Boston College. He specializes in testing and education policy; assessment design and analysis; and higher education outcomes. He has won awards from the AERA, NCME, is a fellow of both the ASA and AERA, and an elected member of the National Academy of Education and the American Academy of Arts & Sciences.Audry A. FriedmanAudry A. Friedman is a retired Associate Professor of Teaching, Curriculum, and Society at the Lynch School of Education and Human Development at Boston College. Currently she is a researcher, instructor, and supervisor for the Urban Catholic Teacher Corps at Boston College. Her research addresses moral-cognitive decision-making and critical reasoning and formative experiences that nurture the development of critical reasoning, meaning, and purpose in young adults.","PeriodicalId":47410,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Moral Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applying variable- and person-centered approaches in the study of higher education learning outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Ella Anghel, Henry I. Braun, Audry A. Friedman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03057240.2023.2252615\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTMany believe that higher education contributes to students’ joint cognitive and non-cognitive development. However, relevant empirical evidence of that is scarce. Employing a sample of 348 college students, the present study explored the relationships among a range of outcomes using both a variable- and a person-centered approach. We found that a sense of purpose, strength of principles, and moral agency were positively associated. However, cognitive and non-cognitive outcomes were only weakly correlated. We also found that most students had either high or low scores in all of the measured outcomes, but some had non-uniform profiles. These results suggest that colleges should not assume that cognitive and non-cognitive developments are strongly related. College students likely need differentiated instruction and support, depending on their individual backgrounds, interests, and levels of the target constructs.KEYWORDS: Higher educationmoral judgment developmentcognitive developmentlatent profile analysis AcknowledgmentsWe would like to thank Andres Castro Samayoa, Chris Constas, Kerry Cronin, Gabrielle Thome, and the instructors of the Perspectives program at Boston College for their assistance with data collection.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementData will be made readily available upon request for research purposes.Notes1. One group of students from which data were collected was not asked to provide age, see below.2. The EHD students’ CT scores were also reported elsewhere (Anghel et al., Citation2021).Additional informationFundingFunding was provided by an Ignite grant through Boston College.Notes on contributorsElla AnghelElla Anghel recently earned her Ph.D. from the Department of Measurement, Evaluation, Statistics, and Assessment at the Lynch School of Education and Human Development, Boston College. Her current research focuses on technology-enhanced assessment and learning.Henry I. BraunHenry I. Braun is the Boisi Professor of Education and Public Policy at Boston College. He specializes in testing and education policy; assessment design and analysis; and higher education outcomes. He has won awards from the AERA, NCME, is a fellow of both the ASA and AERA, and an elected member of the National Academy of Education and the American Academy of Arts & Sciences.Audry A. FriedmanAudry A. Friedman is a retired Associate Professor of Teaching, Curriculum, and Society at the Lynch School of Education and Human Development at Boston College. Currently she is a researcher, instructor, and supervisor for the Urban Catholic Teacher Corps at Boston College. Her research addresses moral-cognitive decision-making and critical reasoning and formative experiences that nurture the development of critical reasoning, meaning, and purpose in young adults.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47410,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Moral Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Moral Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2023.2252615\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Moral Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2023.2252615","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要许多人认为,高等教育促进了学生认知和非认知的共同发展。然而,相关的经验证据是稀缺的。本研究以348名大学生为样本,采用以变量为中心和以人为中心的方法,探讨了一系列结果之间的关系。我们发现使命感、原则的力量和道德能动性呈正相关。然而,认知和非认知结果仅呈弱相关。我们还发现,大多数学生在所有测量结果中都有高分或低分,但有些学生的情况并不一致。这些结果表明,大学不应该假设认知和非认知发展是密切相关的。大学生可能需要不同的指导和支持,这取决于他们的个人背景、兴趣和目标构念的水平。致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。数据可用性声明应研究目的的要求,我们将随时提供数据。收集数据的一组学生没有被要求提供年龄,见下文2。EHD学生的CT分数在其他地方也有报道(Anghel et al., Citation2021)。其他信息资金由波士顿学院的Ignite资助提供。ella Anghel最近获得了波士顿学院林奇教育与人类发展学院测量、评估、统计和评估系的博士学位。她目前的研究重点是技术增强的评估和学习。Henry I. Braun是波士顿学院教育和公共政策的Boisi教授。他专门研究考试和教育政策;评估设计与分析;以及高等教育的成果。他曾获得美国艺术与科学学会(AERA)、NCME颁发的奖项,是美国艺术与科学学会(ASA)和美国艺术与科学学会(AERA)的会员,也是美国国家教育学院和美国艺术与科学学院的当选成员。Audry a . Friedman是波士顿学院林奇教育与人类发展学院教学、课程与社会的退休副教授。目前,她是波士顿学院城市天主教教师团的研究员、讲师和主管。她的研究涉及道德认知决策和批判性推理以及培养年轻人批判性推理、意义和目的发展的形成性经验。
Applying variable- and person-centered approaches in the study of higher education learning outcomes
ABSTRACTMany believe that higher education contributes to students’ joint cognitive and non-cognitive development. However, relevant empirical evidence of that is scarce. Employing a sample of 348 college students, the present study explored the relationships among a range of outcomes using both a variable- and a person-centered approach. We found that a sense of purpose, strength of principles, and moral agency were positively associated. However, cognitive and non-cognitive outcomes were only weakly correlated. We also found that most students had either high or low scores in all of the measured outcomes, but some had non-uniform profiles. These results suggest that colleges should not assume that cognitive and non-cognitive developments are strongly related. College students likely need differentiated instruction and support, depending on their individual backgrounds, interests, and levels of the target constructs.KEYWORDS: Higher educationmoral judgment developmentcognitive developmentlatent profile analysis AcknowledgmentsWe would like to thank Andres Castro Samayoa, Chris Constas, Kerry Cronin, Gabrielle Thome, and the instructors of the Perspectives program at Boston College for their assistance with data collection.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementData will be made readily available upon request for research purposes.Notes1. One group of students from which data were collected was not asked to provide age, see below.2. The EHD students’ CT scores were also reported elsewhere (Anghel et al., Citation2021).Additional informationFundingFunding was provided by an Ignite grant through Boston College.Notes on contributorsElla AnghelElla Anghel recently earned her Ph.D. from the Department of Measurement, Evaluation, Statistics, and Assessment at the Lynch School of Education and Human Development, Boston College. Her current research focuses on technology-enhanced assessment and learning.Henry I. BraunHenry I. Braun is the Boisi Professor of Education and Public Policy at Boston College. He specializes in testing and education policy; assessment design and analysis; and higher education outcomes. He has won awards from the AERA, NCME, is a fellow of both the ASA and AERA, and an elected member of the National Academy of Education and the American Academy of Arts & Sciences.Audry A. FriedmanAudry A. Friedman is a retired Associate Professor of Teaching, Curriculum, and Society at the Lynch School of Education and Human Development at Boston College. Currently she is a researcher, instructor, and supervisor for the Urban Catholic Teacher Corps at Boston College. Her research addresses moral-cognitive decision-making and critical reasoning and formative experiences that nurture the development of critical reasoning, meaning, and purpose in young adults.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Moral Education (a Charitable Company Limited by Guarantee) provides a unique interdisciplinary forum for consideration of all aspects of moral education and development across the lifespan. It contains philosophical analyses, reports of empirical research and evaluation of educational strategies which address a range of value issues and the process of valuing, in theory and practice, and also at the social and individual level. The journal regularly includes country based state-of-the-art papers on moral education and publishes special issues on particular topics.