航空英语听力测试的结构探讨:国际民航组织评定量表的定性分析

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes Pub Date : 2023-04-25 DOI:10.22190/jtesap230220007g
Angela C. de M. Garcia
{"title":"航空英语听力测试的结构探讨:国际民航组织评定量表的定性分析","authors":"Angela C. de M. Garcia","doi":"10.22190/jtesap230220007g","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the publication of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO)’s language proficiency requirements, a number of different tests have been developed and implemented around the world to assess pilots and air traffic controllers’ proficiency in English. Meanwhile, researchers have questioned the clarity and appropriateness of the policy, and the reliability of tests (e.g., Alderson 2011; Douglas 2004; Emery 2014). ICAO has recently acknowledged that, over the years, multiple interpretations of the policy have led to practices that might undermine the meaningfulness of aviation English tests (ICAO 2022b). However, the ICAO Rating Scale remains as the instrument to be used in assessing pilots and air traffic controllers’ aeronautical language proficiency. Thus, this article explores the construct of aeronautical English listening tests stated in the comprehension descriptors of the ICAO rating scale, as well as the elements of the other descriptors that may inform the definition of this construct. An in-depth content analysis of the rating scale was conducted by using the “interview technique”, as described by O’Leary (2021). Results provide useful information for the development of listening tests in the aeronautical context. A better interpretation of the construct informed by the policy can help to reduce the differences among test implementations around the world and further contribute to more standardized and meaningful testing practices.","PeriodicalId":42098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"INVESTIGATING THE CONSTRUCT OF AERONAUTICAL ENGLISH LISTENING TESTING: A QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE ICAO RATING SCALE\",\"authors\":\"Angela C. de M. Garcia\",\"doi\":\"10.22190/jtesap230220007g\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since the publication of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO)’s language proficiency requirements, a number of different tests have been developed and implemented around the world to assess pilots and air traffic controllers’ proficiency in English. Meanwhile, researchers have questioned the clarity and appropriateness of the policy, and the reliability of tests (e.g., Alderson 2011; Douglas 2004; Emery 2014). ICAO has recently acknowledged that, over the years, multiple interpretations of the policy have led to practices that might undermine the meaningfulness of aviation English tests (ICAO 2022b). However, the ICAO Rating Scale remains as the instrument to be used in assessing pilots and air traffic controllers’ aeronautical language proficiency. Thus, this article explores the construct of aeronautical English listening tests stated in the comprehension descriptors of the ICAO rating scale, as well as the elements of the other descriptors that may inform the definition of this construct. An in-depth content analysis of the rating scale was conducted by using the “interview technique”, as described by O’Leary (2021). Results provide useful information for the development of listening tests in the aeronautical context. A better interpretation of the construct informed by the policy can help to reduce the differences among test implementations around the world and further contribute to more standardized and meaningful testing practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42098,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22190/jtesap230220007g\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22190/jtesap230220007g","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

自国际民用航空组织(ICAO)公布语言能力要求以来,世界各地已经开发和实施了许多不同的测试,以评估飞行员和空中交通管制员的英语能力。与此同时,研究人员质疑该政策的明确性和适当性,以及测试的可靠性(例如,Alderson 2011;道格拉斯2004;金刚砂2014)。民航组织最近承认,多年来,对该政策的多种解释导致一些做法可能会损害航空英语考试的意义(ICAO 2022b)。然而,国际民航组织等级表仍然是评估飞行员和空中交通管制员航空语言能力的工具。因此,本文探讨了在国际民航组织等级量表的理解描述符中所述的航空英语听力测试的结构,以及可能为该结构的定义提供信息的其他描述符的要素。使用O’leary(2021)所描述的“访谈技术”对评定量表进行了深入的内容分析。结果为航空听力测试的发展提供了有用的信息。通过策略更好地解释构造可以帮助减少世界各地测试实现之间的差异,并进一步促进更标准化和有意义的测试实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
INVESTIGATING THE CONSTRUCT OF AERONAUTICAL ENGLISH LISTENING TESTING: A QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE ICAO RATING SCALE
Since the publication of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO)’s language proficiency requirements, a number of different tests have been developed and implemented around the world to assess pilots and air traffic controllers’ proficiency in English. Meanwhile, researchers have questioned the clarity and appropriateness of the policy, and the reliability of tests (e.g., Alderson 2011; Douglas 2004; Emery 2014). ICAO has recently acknowledged that, over the years, multiple interpretations of the policy have led to practices that might undermine the meaningfulness of aviation English tests (ICAO 2022b). However, the ICAO Rating Scale remains as the instrument to be used in assessing pilots and air traffic controllers’ aeronautical language proficiency. Thus, this article explores the construct of aeronautical English listening tests stated in the comprehension descriptors of the ICAO rating scale, as well as the elements of the other descriptors that may inform the definition of this construct. An in-depth content analysis of the rating scale was conducted by using the “interview technique”, as described by O’Leary (2021). Results provide useful information for the development of listening tests in the aeronautical context. A better interpretation of the construct informed by the policy can help to reduce the differences among test implementations around the world and further contribute to more standardized and meaningful testing practices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
57.10%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
KAIZENA: A TOOL FOR INDIVIDUALIZED AUDIO FEEDBACK ON ACADEMIC WRITING TEACHING CULTURE IN THE MODERN ESP CLASSROOM TEACHING ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES THROUGH CASE STUDIES: DESIGN, TEACHING, AND EVALUATION STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS ON THE USE OF GOOGLE CLASSROOM IN LSP LEARNING AND ITS EFFECTS ON DEVELOPING LINGUISTIC COMPETENCES ACADEMIC INTEGRITY ON M-READER: THE CASE OF FOUNDATION PROGRAM STUDENTS AT SULTAN QABOOS UNIVERSITY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1