高渗生理盐水与强直生理盐水治疗水牛前胃嵌塞症的疗效比较

IF 0.2 4区 农林科学 Q4 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Buffalo Bulletin Pub Date : 2023-09-30 DOI:10.56825/bufbu.2023.4233533
Sujata Turkar, Sanjeev Kumar Uppal, Charanjeet Singh Randhawa
{"title":"高渗生理盐水与强直生理盐水治疗水牛前胃嵌塞症的疗效比较","authors":"Sujata Turkar, Sanjeev Kumar Uppal, Charanjeet Singh Randhawa","doi":"10.56825/bufbu.2023.4233533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of present investigation was to evaluate the comparative therapeutic efficacy of isotonic (0.9%) saline solution (NSS) and hypertonic (7.5%) saline solution (HSS) along with supportive medical treatment in buffaloes suffered with forestomach impaction. A total of 26 buffaloes were undertaken in two groups. In Group 1, twenty buffaloes were infused with isotonic (0.9%) saline solution 20 ml/kg body weight and in Group 2 six buffaloes were infused with hypertonic saline solution (7.5%) 2 ml/kg. The physical parameters (heart rate and respiration rate) were decreased more significantly in Group 1 after treatment. Similar trend was observed in the pretreatment hematological parameters viz. Hb, PCV, TLC, neutrophil count and ESR after fluid therapy which was indicative of expansion of plasma volume. There was not much effect on rumen liquor parameters after fluid therapy. The biochemical profile (Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), Alkaline phosphatase (ALP), bilirubin, Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, total protein, glucose, globulin and fibrinogen) was more significantly declined in Group 1 after fluid therapy, whereas plasma sodium and chloride levels significantly increased, and plasma potassium level more significantly decreased in Group 2. The recovery rates were 60% and 17% respectively in Group 1 and Group 2. Thus, Isotonic (0.9%) saline solution appears to more effective in therapeutic management of forestomach impaction in buffaloes.","PeriodicalId":9393,"journal":{"name":"Buffalo Bulletin","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative therapeutic efficacy of hypertonic saline solution andisotonic normal saline for fore-stomach impaction disorders in buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis)\",\"authors\":\"Sujata Turkar, Sanjeev Kumar Uppal, Charanjeet Singh Randhawa\",\"doi\":\"10.56825/bufbu.2023.4233533\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of present investigation was to evaluate the comparative therapeutic efficacy of isotonic (0.9%) saline solution (NSS) and hypertonic (7.5%) saline solution (HSS) along with supportive medical treatment in buffaloes suffered with forestomach impaction. A total of 26 buffaloes were undertaken in two groups. In Group 1, twenty buffaloes were infused with isotonic (0.9%) saline solution 20 ml/kg body weight and in Group 2 six buffaloes were infused with hypertonic saline solution (7.5%) 2 ml/kg. The physical parameters (heart rate and respiration rate) were decreased more significantly in Group 1 after treatment. Similar trend was observed in the pretreatment hematological parameters viz. Hb, PCV, TLC, neutrophil count and ESR after fluid therapy which was indicative of expansion of plasma volume. There was not much effect on rumen liquor parameters after fluid therapy. The biochemical profile (Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), Alkaline phosphatase (ALP), bilirubin, Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, total protein, glucose, globulin and fibrinogen) was more significantly declined in Group 1 after fluid therapy, whereas plasma sodium and chloride levels significantly increased, and plasma potassium level more significantly decreased in Group 2. The recovery rates were 60% and 17% respectively in Group 1 and Group 2. Thus, Isotonic (0.9%) saline solution appears to more effective in therapeutic management of forestomach impaction in buffaloes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9393,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Buffalo Bulletin\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Buffalo Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56825/bufbu.2023.4233533\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Buffalo Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56825/bufbu.2023.4233533","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是比较等渗盐水(0.9%)和高渗盐水(7.5%)配合支持治疗对水牛前胃嵌塞的疗效。共有26头水牛被分为两组。1组20头灌胃等渗(0.9%)生理盐水20 ml/kg体重,2组6头灌胃高渗(7.5%)生理盐水2 ml/kg。治疗后1组患者心率、呼吸速率等生理参数下降更为明显。液体治疗后的血液学参数Hb、PCV、TLC、中性粒细胞计数和ESR也有类似的趋势,表明血浆容量增加。液体疗法对瘤胃液参数影响不大。血浆生化指标(谷草转氨酶(AST)、碱性磷酸酶(ALP)、胆红素、血尿素氮(BUN)、肌酐、总蛋白、葡萄糖、球蛋白和纤维蛋白原)在液体治疗后1组下降更为显著,血浆钠、氯水平显著升高,血浆钾水平显著降低。组1和组2的回收率分别为60%和17%。因此,等渗(0.9%)生理盐水溶液在治疗水牛前胃嵌塞方面似乎更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative therapeutic efficacy of hypertonic saline solution andisotonic normal saline for fore-stomach impaction disorders in buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis)
The aim of present investigation was to evaluate the comparative therapeutic efficacy of isotonic (0.9%) saline solution (NSS) and hypertonic (7.5%) saline solution (HSS) along with supportive medical treatment in buffaloes suffered with forestomach impaction. A total of 26 buffaloes were undertaken in two groups. In Group 1, twenty buffaloes were infused with isotonic (0.9%) saline solution 20 ml/kg body weight and in Group 2 six buffaloes were infused with hypertonic saline solution (7.5%) 2 ml/kg. The physical parameters (heart rate and respiration rate) were decreased more significantly in Group 1 after treatment. Similar trend was observed in the pretreatment hematological parameters viz. Hb, PCV, TLC, neutrophil count and ESR after fluid therapy which was indicative of expansion of plasma volume. There was not much effect on rumen liquor parameters after fluid therapy. The biochemical profile (Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), Alkaline phosphatase (ALP), bilirubin, Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, total protein, glucose, globulin and fibrinogen) was more significantly declined in Group 1 after fluid therapy, whereas plasma sodium and chloride levels significantly increased, and plasma potassium level more significantly decreased in Group 2. The recovery rates were 60% and 17% respectively in Group 1 and Group 2. Thus, Isotonic (0.9%) saline solution appears to more effective in therapeutic management of forestomach impaction in buffaloes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Buffalo Bulletin
Buffalo Bulletin AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Buffalo Bulletin is published quarterly in January-March, April-June, July-September and October-December. Contributions on any aspect of research or development, progress reports of projects and news on buffalo will be considered for publication in the bulletin.
期刊最新文献
Characteristics of the karyotype of Ukrainian buffalos Uterine torsion in buffaloes - A complete review Cardiac and physico-chemical responses to xylazine and fentanyl analgesia in Bubalus bubalis Identification of Chlamydia abortus and Chlamydia pecorum in water buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) and cows cohabitating the same herd Physical and bio-control methodologies for integrated management of buffalo fly-Haematobia exigua (Diptera: Muscidae)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1