霍伊尔的四分之一个世纪

IF 0.6 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY LIBRARY Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1093/library/fpad017
David Levy
{"title":"霍伊尔的四分之一个世纪","authors":"David Levy","doi":"10.1093/library/fpad017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Edmond Hoyle wrote the first instructional books on the strategy for card play in the 1740s. The copyright owners, the Proprietors, published them successfully as Hoyle’s Games for a generation. The 1774 decision in Donaldson v Beckett invalidated the copyright and the Proprietors faced legal competition for the first time. Competing booksellers published innovative gaming manuals, marketing them as improved versions of Hoyle, with clearer prose, treatment of additional games, and new formats. Despite the loss of copyright protection and the resulting competition, an ever-changing group of Proprietors dominated the market for gaming literature until the 1860s. With a bibliographical examination of the books, supplemented by archival records of the book trade, this article documents the Proprietor’s success and the reasons for it. The study provides a nuanced perspective of the impact of the Donaldson decision on an unfamiliar genre of literature.","PeriodicalId":44752,"journal":{"name":"LIBRARY","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Century and a Quarter of Hoyle\",\"authors\":\"David Levy\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/library/fpad017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Edmond Hoyle wrote the first instructional books on the strategy for card play in the 1740s. The copyright owners, the Proprietors, published them successfully as Hoyle’s Games for a generation. The 1774 decision in Donaldson v Beckett invalidated the copyright and the Proprietors faced legal competition for the first time. Competing booksellers published innovative gaming manuals, marketing them as improved versions of Hoyle, with clearer prose, treatment of additional games, and new formats. Despite the loss of copyright protection and the resulting competition, an ever-changing group of Proprietors dominated the market for gaming literature until the 1860s. With a bibliographical examination of the books, supplemented by archival records of the book trade, this article documents the Proprietor’s success and the reasons for it. The study provides a nuanced perspective of the impact of the Donaldson decision on an unfamiliar genre of literature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LIBRARY\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LIBRARY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/library/fpad017\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LIBRARY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/library/fpad017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

埃德蒙·霍伊尔在18世纪40年代撰写了第一本关于纸牌策略的教学书籍。版权所有者,即Proprietors,将它们作为Hoyle’s Games成功地发行了一代人。1774年唐纳森诉贝克特案的判决使版权无效,版权所有者第一次面临法律上的竞争。与之竞争的书商出版了创新的游戏手册,将其作为霍伊尔的改进版进行营销,其中有更清晰的文字,对额外游戏的处理,以及新的格式。尽管失去了版权保护和随之而来的竞争,但直到19世纪60年代,不断变化的所有者群体仍主导着游戏文学市场。本文通过对图书的书目分析,辅以图书行业的档案记录,记录了业主的成功及其原因。这项研究提供了一个细致入微的视角来看待唐纳森判决对一种陌生文学类型的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Century and a Quarter of Hoyle
Abstract Edmond Hoyle wrote the first instructional books on the strategy for card play in the 1740s. The copyright owners, the Proprietors, published them successfully as Hoyle’s Games for a generation. The 1774 decision in Donaldson v Beckett invalidated the copyright and the Proprietors faced legal competition for the first time. Competing booksellers published innovative gaming manuals, marketing them as improved versions of Hoyle, with clearer prose, treatment of additional games, and new formats. Despite the loss of copyright protection and the resulting competition, an ever-changing group of Proprietors dominated the market for gaming literature until the 1860s. With a bibliographical examination of the books, supplemented by archival records of the book trade, this article documents the Proprietor’s success and the reasons for it. The study provides a nuanced perspective of the impact of the Donaldson decision on an unfamiliar genre of literature.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
LIBRARY
LIBRARY HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Library is the journal of the Bibliographical Society. For more than a hundred years it has been the pre-eminent UK scholarly journal for the study of bibliography and of the role of the book in history. All aspects of descriptive, analytical, textual and historical bibliography come within its scope, including the history of the production, distribution and reception of books, both manuscript and printed; the history of collecting and of libraries; paper, printing types, book illustration, and binding; and the transmission of texts and their authenticity.
期刊最新文献
The Bibliographical Society Claude Garamont, typographe de l’humanisme. By Rémi Jimenes Recent Periodicals Books Owned by Mary Astell in the Old Library of Magdalene College, Cambridge Leonico Tomeo’s Marginalia: Manuscript and Print in Sixteenth-Century Veneto
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1