学习风格理论:学生的学习偏好会使STEM科目更容易学习吗?

IF 0.2 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal of Educational Sciences Pub Date : 2023-03-05 DOI:10.31901/24566322.2022/40.1-3.1263
Julio Garay
{"title":"学习风格理论:学生的学习偏好会使STEM科目更容易学习吗?","authors":"Julio Garay","doi":"10.31901/24566322.2022/40.1-3.1263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper focuses on exploring how the learning process is perceived by the students. The researchers have chosen Kolb and VARK learning models, in order to identify the participant cohorts’ preferred learning pathways, so the researchers can clearly understand their expectations, strengths and preferences utilising the evidence-based inquiry method. The results indicate that none of the two learning models applied can in actuality include all the broad range of learning expectations of the students, regardless of their age. Youngsters seem to be more aligned with the active learning mode, while older students can perform better with more abstract concepts. The geographic origin seems not to have any noticeable impact on the learning styles preferences of the students participating in these trials.","PeriodicalId":43530,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning Styles Theory: Could Students’ Learning Preferences Make STEM Subjects Easier to Learn?\",\"authors\":\"Julio Garay\",\"doi\":\"10.31901/24566322.2022/40.1-3.1263\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper focuses on exploring how the learning process is perceived by the students. The researchers have chosen Kolb and VARK learning models, in order to identify the participant cohorts’ preferred learning pathways, so the researchers can clearly understand their expectations, strengths and preferences utilising the evidence-based inquiry method. The results indicate that none of the two learning models applied can in actuality include all the broad range of learning expectations of the students, regardless of their age. Youngsters seem to be more aligned with the active learning mode, while older students can perform better with more abstract concepts. The geographic origin seems not to have any noticeable impact on the learning styles preferences of the students participating in these trials.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Educational Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Educational Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31901/24566322.2022/40.1-3.1263\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Educational Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31901/24566322.2022/40.1-3.1263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文主要探讨学生如何感知学习过程。研究人员选择了Kolb和VARK学习模型,以确定参与者群体偏好的学习途径,因此研究人员可以清楚地了解他们的期望,优势和偏好,利用循证探究方法。结果表明,所采用的两种学习模式都不能真正地涵盖学生的所有广泛的学习期望,而不考虑他们的年龄。年轻人似乎更符合主动学习模式,而年龄较大的学生在抽象概念方面表现得更好。地理来源似乎对参加这些试验的学生的学习风格偏好没有任何明显的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Learning Styles Theory: Could Students’ Learning Preferences Make STEM Subjects Easier to Learn?
This paper focuses on exploring how the learning process is perceived by the students. The researchers have chosen Kolb and VARK learning models, in order to identify the participant cohorts’ preferred learning pathways, so the researchers can clearly understand their expectations, strengths and preferences utilising the evidence-based inquiry method. The results indicate that none of the two learning models applied can in actuality include all the broad range of learning expectations of the students, regardless of their age. Youngsters seem to be more aligned with the active learning mode, while older students can perform better with more abstract concepts. The geographic origin seems not to have any noticeable impact on the learning styles preferences of the students participating in these trials.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Educational Sciences
International Journal of Educational Sciences EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
Behavioural Training and Self-Care Skill Development in Early Childhood Down Syndrome in Jordan Beyond the Classroom: A Comprehensive Study on Online Drama in Education for Second Language Pedagogy Trends in Arabic Educational Research: A Content Analysis of Eleven Saudi Refereed Journals in 2021 Correlation of Human Development Index (HDI) of the Parents with Learning Quality of Graduate Students Deputy Headteachers’ Experiences of their Functions for National Curriculum Implementation: A Case Study of Eswatini
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1