估算席位和选票的党派优势

IF 1.3 Q1 LAW Election Law Journal Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1089/elj.2022.0031
Alec Ramsay
{"title":"估算席位和选票的党派优势","authors":"Alec Ramsay","doi":"10.1089/elj.2022.0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A new classification of metrics is introduced: Seats–Votes Partisan Advantage (). Metrics in this class measure whether redistricting plans favor one political party or the other. Ten prominent measures of partisan bias are computed for a cross-section of past, present, and hypothetical congressional plans and are classified with respect to this new taxonomy. Of these ten, only (dis)proportionality and the efficiency gap are found to be measures of . One newer metric measures as well.","PeriodicalId":45644,"journal":{"name":"Election Law Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating Seats–Votes Partisan Advantage\",\"authors\":\"Alec Ramsay\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/elj.2022.0031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A new classification of metrics is introduced: Seats–Votes Partisan Advantage (). Metrics in this class measure whether redistricting plans favor one political party or the other. Ten prominent measures of partisan bias are computed for a cross-section of past, present, and hypothetical congressional plans and are classified with respect to this new taxonomy. Of these ten, only (dis)proportionality and the efficiency gap are found to be measures of . One newer metric measures as well.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Election Law Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Election Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/elj.2022.0031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Election Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/elj.2022.0031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引入了一种新的指标分类:席位-选票-党派优势()。这类指标衡量重新划分计划是否有利于一个政党或另一个政党。根据过去、现在和假设的国会计划的横截面计算了10个突出的党派偏见指标,并根据这一新分类法进行了分类。在这十项中,只有不成比例性和效率差距被发现是衡量的标准。还有一个新的度量标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Estimating Seats–Votes Partisan Advantage
A new classification of metrics is introduced: Seats–Votes Partisan Advantage (). Metrics in this class measure whether redistricting plans favor one political party or the other. Ten prominent measures of partisan bias are computed for a cross-section of past, present, and hypothetical congressional plans and are classified with respect to this new taxonomy. Of these ten, only (dis)proportionality and the efficiency gap are found to be measures of . One newer metric measures as well.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Dropbox Allocation and Use Among Georgia Voters in the 2020 Election Voter Information Search and Ranked Choice Voting Can Election Administration Overcome the Effects of Restrictive State Voting Laws? Assessing Precinct Consolidation Strategies Through Simulation Optimization Does the Framing of Information Regarding Foreign Election Interference Matter? Evidence from a Survey Experiment in Canada
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1