从幽默到政治倾向:贬抑幽默对政治认同认知的影响

IF 1.2 3区 心理学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Humor-International Journal of Humor Research Pub Date : 2023-09-29 DOI:10.1515/humor-2023-0082
Willam E. Rice, Thomas E. Ford
{"title":"从幽默到政治倾向:贬抑幽默对政治认同认知的影响","authors":"Willam E. Rice, Thomas E. Ford","doi":"10.1515/humor-2023-0082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract An experiment ( n = 202; 136 women; 66 men) demonstrated that people use implicit theories about liberals and conservatives to guide their impression of another person based on their humor, specifically, the degree to which their humor violates the individualizing and binding moral foundations described by Moral Foundations Theory (e.g., Graham, Haidt and Nosek 2009. Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 96(5). 1029–1046). Supporting Hypothesis 1, participants perceived a target person as more conservative when he posted to social media an immigrant-disparaging meme. They perceived him as more liberal when he posted a religion-disparaging meme. Supporting Hypotheses 2, liberals liked the target person more and conservatives less when he posted the religion-disparaging meme. Similarly, in keeping with Hypothesis 3, liberals liked the target person less and conservatives more after he posted the immigrant-disparaging meme.","PeriodicalId":51635,"journal":{"name":"Humor-International Journal of Humor Research","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From humor to political dispositions: effect of disparagement humor on perceptions of political identity\",\"authors\":\"Willam E. Rice, Thomas E. Ford\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/humor-2023-0082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract An experiment ( n = 202; 136 women; 66 men) demonstrated that people use implicit theories about liberals and conservatives to guide their impression of another person based on their humor, specifically, the degree to which their humor violates the individualizing and binding moral foundations described by Moral Foundations Theory (e.g., Graham, Haidt and Nosek 2009. Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 96(5). 1029–1046). Supporting Hypothesis 1, participants perceived a target person as more conservative when he posted to social media an immigrant-disparaging meme. They perceived him as more liberal when he posted a religion-disparaging meme. Supporting Hypotheses 2, liberals liked the target person more and conservatives less when he posted the religion-disparaging meme. Similarly, in keeping with Hypothesis 3, liberals liked the target person less and conservatives more after he posted the immigrant-disparaging meme.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Humor-International Journal of Humor Research\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Humor-International Journal of Humor Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2023-0082\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Humor-International Journal of Humor Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2023-0082","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

实验(n = 202;136名女性;66名男性)表明,人们使用关于自由派和保守派的内隐理论来指导他们对另一个人的印象,这是基于他们的幽默,特别是他们的幽默在多大程度上违反了道德基础理论所描述的个性化和约束道德基础(例如,Graham, Haidt和Nosek, 2009)。自由主义者和保守主义者依赖于不同的道德基础。人格与社会心理学报,1996(5)。1029 - 1046)。支持假设1,当目标人在社交媒体上发布贬低移民的表情包时,参与者认为他更保守。当他发布一个贬低宗教的表情包时,他们认为他更自由了。支持假设2,当目标人物发布贬低宗教的表情包时,自由派更喜欢他,保守派更不喜欢他。同样,与假设3一致,在目标人物发布了贬低移民的表情包后,自由派更不喜欢他,保守派更喜欢他。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
From humor to political dispositions: effect of disparagement humor on perceptions of political identity
Abstract An experiment ( n = 202; 136 women; 66 men) demonstrated that people use implicit theories about liberals and conservatives to guide their impression of another person based on their humor, specifically, the degree to which their humor violates the individualizing and binding moral foundations described by Moral Foundations Theory (e.g., Graham, Haidt and Nosek 2009. Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 96(5). 1029–1046). Supporting Hypothesis 1, participants perceived a target person as more conservative when he posted to social media an immigrant-disparaging meme. They perceived him as more liberal when he posted a religion-disparaging meme. Supporting Hypotheses 2, liberals liked the target person more and conservatives less when he posted the religion-disparaging meme. Similarly, in keeping with Hypothesis 3, liberals liked the target person less and conservatives more after he posted the immigrant-disparaging meme.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
33
期刊最新文献
Oliver Double and Sharon Lockyer (Eds.): Alternative comedy now and then: critical perspectives Frontmatter From humor to political dispositions: effect of disparagement humor on perceptions of political identity Humor as a source for collaborative storytelling: perspectives on dynamic and static stories Animated satire and collective memory: reflecting on the American “history wars” with The Simpsons
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1