多因素模型是否有助于估计巴西的权益资本成本?

BASE Pub Date : 2023-08-28 DOI:10.4013/base.2023.202.03
Victor Pani, Ricardo Leal, Raphael Moses Roquete
{"title":"多因素模型是否有助于估计巴西的权益资本成本?","authors":"Victor Pani, Ricardo Leal, Raphael Moses Roquete","doi":"10.4013/base.2023.202.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the contribution of well-known multifactor asset pricing models to estimate the cost of equity capital of Brazilian listed companies with the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), the three-factor model of Fama and French (1993), the Carhart (1997) four-factor model and a five-factor model that consists of an additional illiquidity risk factor. The sample are the returns of individual stocks comprising a portfolio of companies in the IBrX 100 stock index from July 2008 to June 2018. Distributions of individual company cost of equity capital estimates obtained with each model were compared among themselves in the full sample period and two sub-periods. The results suggest that adding extra risk factors to the CAPM does not always translate into different cost of equity capital estimates and significantly greater explanatory power. The practical implication is that the CAPM estimates may often be the same as those obtained by means of more complex models with the added bonus of the CAPM's simplicity.","PeriodicalId":8749,"journal":{"name":"BASE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DO MULTIFACTOR MODELS CONTRIBUTE TO ESTIMATE THE COST OF EQUITY CAPITAL IN BRAZIL?\",\"authors\":\"Victor Pani, Ricardo Leal, Raphael Moses Roquete\",\"doi\":\"10.4013/base.2023.202.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study investigates the contribution of well-known multifactor asset pricing models to estimate the cost of equity capital of Brazilian listed companies with the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), the three-factor model of Fama and French (1993), the Carhart (1997) four-factor model and a five-factor model that consists of an additional illiquidity risk factor. The sample are the returns of individual stocks comprising a portfolio of companies in the IBrX 100 stock index from July 2008 to June 2018. Distributions of individual company cost of equity capital estimates obtained with each model were compared among themselves in the full sample period and two sub-periods. The results suggest that adding extra risk factors to the CAPM does not always translate into different cost of equity capital estimates and significantly greater explanatory power. The practical implication is that the CAPM estimates may often be the same as those obtained by means of more complex models with the added bonus of the CAPM's simplicity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8749,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BASE\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BASE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4013/base.2023.202.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BASE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4013/base.2023.202.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究通过资本资产定价模型(CAPM)、Fama和French(1993)的三因素模型、Carhart(1997)的四因素模型和包含额外非流动性风险因素的五因素模型,考察了著名的多因素资产定价模型对巴西上市公司股权资本成本估算的贡献。样本是2008年7月至2018年6月IBrX 100股票指数公司投资组合中单个股票的回报。在整个样本期和两个子周期内,比较了每个模型获得的单个公司权益资本成本估计的分布。结果表明,在CAPM中加入额外的风险因素并不总是转化为不同的权益资本成本估算和显着更大的解释力。实际的含义是,CAPM的估计可能经常与通过更复杂的模型获得的结果相同,而CAPM的简单性是额外的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
DO MULTIFACTOR MODELS CONTRIBUTE TO ESTIMATE THE COST OF EQUITY CAPITAL IN BRAZIL?
This study investigates the contribution of well-known multifactor asset pricing models to estimate the cost of equity capital of Brazilian listed companies with the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), the three-factor model of Fama and French (1993), the Carhart (1997) four-factor model and a five-factor model that consists of an additional illiquidity risk factor. The sample are the returns of individual stocks comprising a portfolio of companies in the IBrX 100 stock index from July 2008 to June 2018. Distributions of individual company cost of equity capital estimates obtained with each model were compared among themselves in the full sample period and two sub-periods. The results suggest that adding extra risk factors to the CAPM does not always translate into different cost of equity capital estimates and significantly greater explanatory power. The practical implication is that the CAPM estimates may often be the same as those obtained by means of more complex models with the added bonus of the CAPM's simplicity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
DO MULTIFACTOR MODELS CONTRIBUTE TO ESTIMATE THE COST OF EQUITY CAPITAL IN BRAZIL? Desempenho e Concentração acionária no Brasil: As características dos Conselhos de Administração podem interferir nesta relação? Reflexos dos determinantes financeiros, demográficos e políticos na atividade virtual dos municípios brasileiros VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURE AND EQUITY FINANCING IN BRAZIL IMPLEMENTAÇÃO DOS PROCEDIMENTOS CONTÁBEIS PATRIMONIAIS E A TRANSPARÊNCIA FISCAL
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1