妥协的质量参数导致后果:研究期刊的索引删除研究

IF 0.5 4区 管理学 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science Pub Date : 2023-08-28 DOI:10.22452/mjlis.vol28no2.2
Ramesh Pandita (Corresponding Author), Shivendra Singh
{"title":"妥协的质量参数导致后果:研究期刊的索引删除研究","authors":"Ramesh Pandita (Corresponding Author), Shivendra Singh","doi":"10.22452/mjlis.vol28no2.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aims to investigate the number of journals de-indexed by Scopus during the last two decades, specifically, from 2000 through 2019. Data for the study were retrieved from SCImago, a Scopus database. The scope of the study is global, covering all the 27 major subject disciplines categorized in Scopus. A total of 6059 research journals were found to be de-indexed from Scopus up until 2019, accounting for 18.61 percent of the total journals indexed in Scopus till date. Among the total de-indexed journals, 2311 (38.14%) journals were de-indexed from the period between 2000 and 2019. A steady decline in the de-indexing of journals has been observed after the year 2010. Among the top 20 countries with the highest number of de-indexed journals, it was found that 90.11 percent of journals have been de-indexed from these countries altogether. The United States stands out as the leading country, contributing to nearly one-third of the total de-indexed journals worldwide, with Medicine (44%) being the leading subject area in the de-indexed journals. On a national level, Sweden takes the lead, recording the highest de-indexing rate of 40.70 percent of journals. Following standard publishing parameters in publishing research results is of utmost importance for several reasons, with the primary one being dissemination of genuine and authentic research for the larger benefit of society. Any compromise with the quality of published research must be addressed seriously, and if necessary de-indexing a journal as a punitive measure should be considered appropriate and welcomed.","PeriodicalId":45072,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Compromising quality parameters lead to fallout: a study of de-indexing of research journals\",\"authors\":\"Ramesh Pandita (Corresponding Author), Shivendra Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.22452/mjlis.vol28no2.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study aims to investigate the number of journals de-indexed by Scopus during the last two decades, specifically, from 2000 through 2019. Data for the study were retrieved from SCImago, a Scopus database. The scope of the study is global, covering all the 27 major subject disciplines categorized in Scopus. A total of 6059 research journals were found to be de-indexed from Scopus up until 2019, accounting for 18.61 percent of the total journals indexed in Scopus till date. Among the total de-indexed journals, 2311 (38.14%) journals were de-indexed from the period between 2000 and 2019. A steady decline in the de-indexing of journals has been observed after the year 2010. Among the top 20 countries with the highest number of de-indexed journals, it was found that 90.11 percent of journals have been de-indexed from these countries altogether. The United States stands out as the leading country, contributing to nearly one-third of the total de-indexed journals worldwide, with Medicine (44%) being the leading subject area in the de-indexed journals. On a national level, Sweden takes the lead, recording the highest de-indexing rate of 40.70 percent of journals. Following standard publishing parameters in publishing research results is of utmost importance for several reasons, with the primary one being dissemination of genuine and authentic research for the larger benefit of society. Any compromise with the quality of published research must be addressed seriously, and if necessary de-indexing a journal as a punitive measure should be considered appropriate and welcomed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22452/mjlis.vol28no2.2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22452/mjlis.vol28no2.2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该研究旨在调查过去二十年(特别是2000年至2019年)被Scopus取消索引的期刊数量。该研究的数据来自Scopus数据库SCImago。该研究的范围是全球性的,涵盖了Scopus分类的所有27个主要学科。截至2019年,共有6059种研究期刊被Scopus删除索引,占Scopus迄今被索引期刊总数的18.61%。2000 - 2019年间被撤标的期刊有2311种(38.14%)。自2010年以来,期刊索引被删除的情况稳步下降。在被撤索引期刊数量最多的前20个国家中,这些国家总共有90.11%的期刊被撤索引。美国作为领先的国家脱颖而出,贡献了全球近三分之一的被取消索引的期刊,医学(44%)是被取消索引期刊的主要学科领域。在国家层面上,瑞典处于领先地位,记录了40.70%的期刊的最高索引删除率。在发表研究成果时,遵循标准的出版参数是至关重要的,原因有以下几点,首先是传播真实可信的研究成果,以实现更大的社会效益。任何对已发表研究质量的妥协都必须认真对待,如果有必要,作为惩罚措施取消期刊索引应该被认为是适当的和受欢迎的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Compromising quality parameters lead to fallout: a study of de-indexing of research journals
The study aims to investigate the number of journals de-indexed by Scopus during the last two decades, specifically, from 2000 through 2019. Data for the study were retrieved from SCImago, a Scopus database. The scope of the study is global, covering all the 27 major subject disciplines categorized in Scopus. A total of 6059 research journals were found to be de-indexed from Scopus up until 2019, accounting for 18.61 percent of the total journals indexed in Scopus till date. Among the total de-indexed journals, 2311 (38.14%) journals were de-indexed from the period between 2000 and 2019. A steady decline in the de-indexing of journals has been observed after the year 2010. Among the top 20 countries with the highest number of de-indexed journals, it was found that 90.11 percent of journals have been de-indexed from these countries altogether. The United States stands out as the leading country, contributing to nearly one-third of the total de-indexed journals worldwide, with Medicine (44%) being the leading subject area in the de-indexed journals. On a national level, Sweden takes the lead, recording the highest de-indexing rate of 40.70 percent of journals. Following standard publishing parameters in publishing research results is of utmost importance for several reasons, with the primary one being dissemination of genuine and authentic research for the larger benefit of society. Any compromise with the quality of published research must be addressed seriously, and if necessary de-indexing a journal as a punitive measure should be considered appropriate and welcomed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science
Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
A study on the election factors of ACM Fellow based on the co-authorship relationship Compromising quality parameters lead to fallout: a study of de-indexing of research journals Teaching strategies for library instruction: directions from the literature Strategies for building institutional repositories a case study of content recruitment in Malaysian higher learning institutions Exploring authors engagement in journals with questionable practices: a case study of OMICS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1