抑制非ige介导的青霉素过敏警报后围手术期头孢唑林处方率

Ashley Bogus, Kelley McGinnis, Sara May, Erica Stohs, Trevor Van Schooneveld, Scott Bergman
{"title":"抑制非ige介导的青霉素过敏警报后围手术期头孢唑林处方率","authors":"Ashley Bogus, Kelley McGinnis, Sara May, Erica Stohs, Trevor Van Schooneveld, Scott Bergman","doi":"10.1017/ash.2023.369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Cefazolin is the preferred antimicrobial for prevention of surgical-site infections in most procedures at our institution. Our first alternative is vancomycin which is associated with higher adverse events and infection rates. The presence of penicillin allergies can influence prescribing of vancomycin despite a low risk of cross-reactivity between penicillin and cephalosporins. Nebraska Medicine implemented a systemwide change in April 2022 that suppressed alerts for non–IgE-mediated penicillin allergies in the electronic medical record (EMR, Epic Systems) upon cephalosporin prescribing. We evaluated changes in perioperative antimicrobial surgical infection prophylaxis after this change. Methods: We conducted a quasi-experimental study of all patients undergoing procedures for which cefazolin is considered preferred per institutional guidance. Preintervention data were from April 1, 2021, to March 31, 2022, and postintervention data included patients from April 11, 2022, to October 31, 2022, after guidance was distributed to surgeons, operating room staff, and pharmacists. Patients were excluded if they were aged <19 years, had a hospital length of stay <24 hours, underwent procedures after their first throughout the time frame, or received both vancomycin and cefazolin. Statistical significance was set at P < .05, determined using the Fisher exact test. Results: The study included 6,676 patients: 4,147 in the preintervention group and 2,529 in the postintervention group. We identified 15 procedure categories, with no significant differences between periods (Table 1). The average age was 61 years. Penicillin allergy was reported in 508 patients (12.3%) in the preintervention group and in 319 patients (12.6%) in the postintervention group. In individuals with penicillin allergy, cefazolin prescribing increased from 49.6% to 74.3% ( P < .01) and vancomycin prescribing decreased from 50.4% to 25.7% ( P < .01). The largest changes occurred in patients undergoing cardiac, spinal, neurological, and vascular procedures. For patients without penicillin allergy, prescribing remained unchanged. Overall, cefazolin prescribing increased from 92.0% to 95.0% ( P < .01), and the rate of vancomycin prescribing decreased from 8.0% to 5.0% ( P < .01) in procedures for which cefazolin was preferred. Conclusions: Following the suppression of EMR alerts for non–IgE-mediated allergies when ordering cephalosporins, penicillin prescribing rates of cefazolin for surgical infection prophylaxis improved significantly in procedures for which it was the preferred agent. Further research on infection rates and adverse events with these and other alternative agents are needed. Disclosures: None","PeriodicalId":7953,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perioperative cefazolin prescribing rates following suppression of alerts for non-IgE-mediated penicillin allergies\",\"authors\":\"Ashley Bogus, Kelley McGinnis, Sara May, Erica Stohs, Trevor Van Schooneveld, Scott Bergman\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/ash.2023.369\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Cefazolin is the preferred antimicrobial for prevention of surgical-site infections in most procedures at our institution. Our first alternative is vancomycin which is associated with higher adverse events and infection rates. The presence of penicillin allergies can influence prescribing of vancomycin despite a low risk of cross-reactivity between penicillin and cephalosporins. Nebraska Medicine implemented a systemwide change in April 2022 that suppressed alerts for non–IgE-mediated penicillin allergies in the electronic medical record (EMR, Epic Systems) upon cephalosporin prescribing. We evaluated changes in perioperative antimicrobial surgical infection prophylaxis after this change. Methods: We conducted a quasi-experimental study of all patients undergoing procedures for which cefazolin is considered preferred per institutional guidance. Preintervention data were from April 1, 2021, to March 31, 2022, and postintervention data included patients from April 11, 2022, to October 31, 2022, after guidance was distributed to surgeons, operating room staff, and pharmacists. Patients were excluded if they were aged <19 years, had a hospital length of stay <24 hours, underwent procedures after their first throughout the time frame, or received both vancomycin and cefazolin. Statistical significance was set at P < .05, determined using the Fisher exact test. Results: The study included 6,676 patients: 4,147 in the preintervention group and 2,529 in the postintervention group. We identified 15 procedure categories, with no significant differences between periods (Table 1). The average age was 61 years. Penicillin allergy was reported in 508 patients (12.3%) in the preintervention group and in 319 patients (12.6%) in the postintervention group. In individuals with penicillin allergy, cefazolin prescribing increased from 49.6% to 74.3% ( P < .01) and vancomycin prescribing decreased from 50.4% to 25.7% ( P < .01). The largest changes occurred in patients undergoing cardiac, spinal, neurological, and vascular procedures. For patients without penicillin allergy, prescribing remained unchanged. Overall, cefazolin prescribing increased from 92.0% to 95.0% ( P < .01), and the rate of vancomycin prescribing decreased from 8.0% to 5.0% ( P < .01) in procedures for which cefazolin was preferred. Conclusions: Following the suppression of EMR alerts for non–IgE-mediated allergies when ordering cephalosporins, penicillin prescribing rates of cefazolin for surgical infection prophylaxis improved significantly in procedures for which it was the preferred agent. Further research on infection rates and adverse events with these and other alternative agents are needed. Disclosures: None\",\"PeriodicalId\":7953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\"101 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2023.369\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2023.369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:头孢唑林是我们机构大多数手术中预防手术部位感染的首选抗菌药物。我们的第一个选择是万古霉素,它与较高的不良事件和感染率有关。青霉素过敏的存在可以影响万古霉素的处方,尽管青霉素和头孢菌素之间交叉反应的风险很低。内布拉斯加州医学中心于2022年4月实施了一项全系统变更,禁止在开具头孢菌素处方时,电子病历(EMR, Epic Systems)中出现非ige介导的青霉素过敏警报。我们评估了术后围手术期抗菌外科感染预防的变化。方法:根据机构指导,我们对所有接受头孢唑林优先治疗的患者进行了准实验研究。干预前数据为2021年4月1日至2022年3月31日,干预后数据为2022年4月11日至2022年10月31日,对外科医生、手术室工作人员和药剂师进行指导。如果患者年龄为19岁,住院时间为24小时,在整个时间段内第一次手术后接受手术,或同时接受万古霉素和头孢唑林,则排除在外。P <有统计学意义;0.05,使用Fisher精确检验确定。结果:共纳入6676例患者:干预前组4147例,干预后组2529例。我们确定了15种手术类别,不同时期之间没有显著差异(表1)。平均年龄为61岁。干预前组508例(12.3%)患者报告青霉素过敏,干预后组319例(12.6%)患者报告青霉素过敏。在青霉素过敏的个体中,头孢唑林处方从49.6%增加到74.3% (P <.01),万古霉素处方从50.4%降至25.7% (P <. 01)。最大的变化发生在接受心脏、脊柱、神经和血管手术的患者中。对于没有青霉素过敏的患者,处方保持不变。总体而言,头孢唑林处方从92.0%增加到95.0% (P <.01),万古霉素处方率由8.0%降至5.0% (P <.01)在优选头孢唑林的手术中。结论:在订购头孢菌素时抑制非ige介导的过敏的EMR警报后,头孢唑林作为首选药物用于外科感染预防的青霉素处方率显着提高。需要进一步研究这些药物和其他替代药物的感染率和不良事件。披露:没有
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Perioperative cefazolin prescribing rates following suppression of alerts for non-IgE-mediated penicillin allergies
Background: Cefazolin is the preferred antimicrobial for prevention of surgical-site infections in most procedures at our institution. Our first alternative is vancomycin which is associated with higher adverse events and infection rates. The presence of penicillin allergies can influence prescribing of vancomycin despite a low risk of cross-reactivity between penicillin and cephalosporins. Nebraska Medicine implemented a systemwide change in April 2022 that suppressed alerts for non–IgE-mediated penicillin allergies in the electronic medical record (EMR, Epic Systems) upon cephalosporin prescribing. We evaluated changes in perioperative antimicrobial surgical infection prophylaxis after this change. Methods: We conducted a quasi-experimental study of all patients undergoing procedures for which cefazolin is considered preferred per institutional guidance. Preintervention data were from April 1, 2021, to March 31, 2022, and postintervention data included patients from April 11, 2022, to October 31, 2022, after guidance was distributed to surgeons, operating room staff, and pharmacists. Patients were excluded if they were aged <19 years, had a hospital length of stay <24 hours, underwent procedures after their first throughout the time frame, or received both vancomycin and cefazolin. Statistical significance was set at P < .05, determined using the Fisher exact test. Results: The study included 6,676 patients: 4,147 in the preintervention group and 2,529 in the postintervention group. We identified 15 procedure categories, with no significant differences between periods (Table 1). The average age was 61 years. Penicillin allergy was reported in 508 patients (12.3%) in the preintervention group and in 319 patients (12.6%) in the postintervention group. In individuals with penicillin allergy, cefazolin prescribing increased from 49.6% to 74.3% ( P < .01) and vancomycin prescribing decreased from 50.4% to 25.7% ( P < .01). The largest changes occurred in patients undergoing cardiac, spinal, neurological, and vascular procedures. For patients without penicillin allergy, prescribing remained unchanged. Overall, cefazolin prescribing increased from 92.0% to 95.0% ( P < .01), and the rate of vancomycin prescribing decreased from 8.0% to 5.0% ( P < .01) in procedures for which cefazolin was preferred. Conclusions: Following the suppression of EMR alerts for non–IgE-mediated allergies when ordering cephalosporins, penicillin prescribing rates of cefazolin for surgical infection prophylaxis improved significantly in procedures for which it was the preferred agent. Further research on infection rates and adverse events with these and other alternative agents are needed. Disclosures: None
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using whole genome sequencing to characterize Clostridioides difficile isolates at a tertiary center in Melbourne, Australia Influenza outbreak management tabletop exercise for congregate living settings Bring it on again: antimicrobial stewardship in transplant infectious diseases: updates and new challenges Professor Mahmood Bhutta on disrupting unhealthy supply chains and promoting environmental sustainability in health care Oral amoxicillin challenges for low-risk penicillin-allergic patients at a large Veterans Affairs facility: a retrospective feasibility analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1