阅读器上的学术诚信:以苏丹卡布斯大学预科学生为例

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes Pub Date : 2023-10-09 DOI:10.22190/jtesap230622039a
Tareq Al Damen, Karleen Cambrdige
{"title":"阅读器上的学术诚信:以苏丹卡布斯大学预科学生为例","authors":"Tareq Al Damen, Karleen Cambrdige","doi":"10.22190/jtesap230622039a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"-reader is an online extensive reading tool that motivates learners to read extensively and ‎autonomously. Through its online quizzes, M-reader tests students' comprehension of ‎graded readers and provides evidence that they have read and understood their reading. ‎Today, M-reader is used by several academic institutions around the world to facilitate ‎their extensive reading programs. However, concerns have been raised about academic ‎integrity in connection with M-reader. For instance, one of the foremost challenges of ‎administering M-reader is students taking quizzes on behalf of others. 229 first-year ‎university students enrolled in Sultan Qaboos University's Foundation Program (FP) in ‎Oman participated in the current study. The purpose of this paper was to investigate the ‎effectiveness of the measures implemented to reduce cheating on M-reader, as well as to ‎discover what students perceive as academic integrity on M-reader. To gauge the efficacy ‎of M-reader in maintaining academic integrity, participants completed an online ‎questionnaire and samples of the various measures were collected and analyzed. The ‎findings of the study revealed that the measures taken to mitigate academic integrity on M-‎reader were ineffective. The findings also indicated that M-reader appeared ineffective in ‎maintaining academic integrity among students. Additionally, the study identified how ‎students perceive the measures taken to mitigate cheating. Moreover, the study suggests ‎ways to improve the effectiveness of M-reader in terms of academic integrity.‎","PeriodicalId":42098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ACADEMIC INTEGRITY ON M-READER: THE CASE OF FOUNDATION PROGRAM STUDENTS AT SULTAN QABOOS UNIVERSITY\",\"authors\":\"Tareq Al Damen, Karleen Cambrdige\",\"doi\":\"10.22190/jtesap230622039a\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"-reader is an online extensive reading tool that motivates learners to read extensively and ‎autonomously. Through its online quizzes, M-reader tests students' comprehension of ‎graded readers and provides evidence that they have read and understood their reading. ‎Today, M-reader is used by several academic institutions around the world to facilitate ‎their extensive reading programs. However, concerns have been raised about academic ‎integrity in connection with M-reader. For instance, one of the foremost challenges of ‎administering M-reader is students taking quizzes on behalf of others. 229 first-year ‎university students enrolled in Sultan Qaboos University's Foundation Program (FP) in ‎Oman participated in the current study. The purpose of this paper was to investigate the ‎effectiveness of the measures implemented to reduce cheating on M-reader, as well as to ‎discover what students perceive as academic integrity on M-reader. To gauge the efficacy ‎of M-reader in maintaining academic integrity, participants completed an online ‎questionnaire and samples of the various measures were collected and analyzed. The ‎findings of the study revealed that the measures taken to mitigate academic integrity on M-‎reader were ineffective. The findings also indicated that M-reader appeared ineffective in ‎maintaining academic integrity among students. Additionally, the study identified how ‎students perceive the measures taken to mitigate cheating. Moreover, the study suggests ‎ways to improve the effectiveness of M-reader in terms of academic integrity.‎\",\"PeriodicalId\":42098,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22190/jtesap230622039a\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22190/jtesap230622039a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

-reader是一个在线广泛阅读工具,激励学习者广泛和自主地阅读。通过在线测验,M-reader测试学生对分级阅读的理解,并提供证据证明他们已经阅读并理解了他们的阅读。今天,M-reader被世界各地的一些学术机构用来促进他们广泛的阅读项目。然而,人们对与M-reader相关的学术诚信提出了担忧。例如,管理M-reader最主要的挑战之一是学生代替别人参加测验。229名参加阿曼苏丹卡布斯大学预科项目(FP)的一年级大学生参与了本研究。本文的目的是调查为减少M-reader作弊而实施的措施的有效性,以及发现学生对M-reader学术诚信的看法。为了评估M-reader在维护学术诚信方面的有效性,参与者完成了一份在线问卷,并收集和分析了各种措施的样本。研究结果表明,所采取的措施,以减轻学术诚信对M-读者是无效的。研究结果还表明,M-reader在维护学生的学术诚信方面似乎是无效的。此外,该研究还确定了学生如何看待为减轻作弊而采取的措施。此外,本研究还提出了在学术诚信方面提高M-reader有效性的方法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ACADEMIC INTEGRITY ON M-READER: THE CASE OF FOUNDATION PROGRAM STUDENTS AT SULTAN QABOOS UNIVERSITY
-reader is an online extensive reading tool that motivates learners to read extensively and ‎autonomously. Through its online quizzes, M-reader tests students' comprehension of ‎graded readers and provides evidence that they have read and understood their reading. ‎Today, M-reader is used by several academic institutions around the world to facilitate ‎their extensive reading programs. However, concerns have been raised about academic ‎integrity in connection with M-reader. For instance, one of the foremost challenges of ‎administering M-reader is students taking quizzes on behalf of others. 229 first-year ‎university students enrolled in Sultan Qaboos University's Foundation Program (FP) in ‎Oman participated in the current study. The purpose of this paper was to investigate the ‎effectiveness of the measures implemented to reduce cheating on M-reader, as well as to ‎discover what students perceive as academic integrity on M-reader. To gauge the efficacy ‎of M-reader in maintaining academic integrity, participants completed an online ‎questionnaire and samples of the various measures were collected and analyzed. The ‎findings of the study revealed that the measures taken to mitigate academic integrity on M-‎reader were ineffective. The findings also indicated that M-reader appeared ineffective in ‎maintaining academic integrity among students. Additionally, the study identified how ‎students perceive the measures taken to mitigate cheating. Moreover, the study suggests ‎ways to improve the effectiveness of M-reader in terms of academic integrity.‎
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
57.10%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
KAIZENA: A TOOL FOR INDIVIDUALIZED AUDIO FEEDBACK ON ACADEMIC WRITING TEACHING CULTURE IN THE MODERN ESP CLASSROOM TEACHING ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES THROUGH CASE STUDIES: DESIGN, TEACHING, AND EVALUATION STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS ON THE USE OF GOOGLE CLASSROOM IN LSP LEARNING AND ITS EFFECTS ON DEVELOPING LINGUISTIC COMPETENCES ACADEMIC INTEGRITY ON M-READER: THE CASE OF FOUNDATION PROGRAM STUDENTS AT SULTAN QABOOS UNIVERSITY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1