亚马逊集市案:既是法官又是当事人的风险

Carmen Herrero Suárez
{"title":"亚马逊集市案:既是法官又是当事人的风险","authors":"Carmen Herrero Suárez","doi":"10.24840/2182-9845_2023-0003_0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A common feature of dominant digital platforms is that they are integrated into a plurality of business lines, including the markets they organise or connect, so that they operate a platform and market their own goods and services on it. This dual role played by platforms in various digital markets, acting simultaneously as intermediaries and providers, has raised fears that it may be exploited by platforms to further entrench their dominance, frustrate competition and stifle innovation. Despite the introduction of novel terms, such as self-preferencing, we are actually facing a classic conflict of interest that can be addressed from different branches of the legal system.","PeriodicalId":40129,"journal":{"name":"RED-Revista Electronica de Direito","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Amazon Market Place case: The risks of being a judge and party\",\"authors\":\"Carmen Herrero Suárez\",\"doi\":\"10.24840/2182-9845_2023-0003_0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A common feature of dominant digital platforms is that they are integrated into a plurality of business lines, including the markets they organise or connect, so that they operate a platform and market their own goods and services on it. This dual role played by platforms in various digital markets, acting simultaneously as intermediaries and providers, has raised fears that it may be exploited by platforms to further entrench their dominance, frustrate competition and stifle innovation. Despite the introduction of novel terms, such as self-preferencing, we are actually facing a classic conflict of interest that can be addressed from different branches of the legal system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RED-Revista Electronica de Direito\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RED-Revista Electronica de Direito\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24840/2182-9845_2023-0003_0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RED-Revista Electronica de Direito","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24840/2182-9845_2023-0003_0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

占主导地位的数字平台的一个共同特征是,它们被整合到多个业务线中,包括它们组织或连接的市场,因此它们运营一个平台,并在该平台上销售自己的商品和服务。平台在各种数字市场中同时扮演中介和提供商的双重角色,这让人们担心,平台可能会利用这一双重角色进一步巩固自己的主导地位,阻碍竞争,扼杀创新。尽管引入了诸如自我偏好之类的新术语,但我们实际上面临的是一种经典的利益冲突,可以从法律体系的不同部门加以解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Amazon Market Place case: The risks of being a judge and party
A common feature of dominant digital platforms is that they are integrated into a plurality of business lines, including the markets they organise or connect, so that they operate a platform and market their own goods and services on it. This dual role played by platforms in various digital markets, acting simultaneously as intermediaries and providers, has raised fears that it may be exploited by platforms to further entrench their dominance, frustrate competition and stifle innovation. Despite the introduction of novel terms, such as self-preferencing, we are actually facing a classic conflict of interest that can be addressed from different branches of the legal system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Press publishers' rights in the Digital Age: Challenges and opportunities for legal and policy frameworks Os contratos eletrónicos B2C Revisitando o tema da conversão do contrato a termo no emprego público: o acórdão do Supremo Tribunal Administrativo, de 8.09.2022 Deveres de Informação e Proteção do Consumidor Inteligência Artificial. Quadro jurídico e reflexões sobre a Proposta de Regulamento de Inteligência Artificial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1