解开养老金之争:“三重锁”的起源和未来

IF 1.7 3区 社会学 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Political Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-11-10 DOI:10.1111/1467-923x.13330
Jonathan Portes
{"title":"解开养老金之争:“三重锁”的起源和未来","authors":"Jonathan Portes","doi":"10.1111/1467-923x.13330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The ‘triple lock’ mechanism governing the uprating of state pensions is often framed as a transfer from workers to mostly well‐off pensioners, driven by the latter's outsize political influence. Others note that pensioner poverty remains widespread and that the UK state pension remains relatively low compared to other advanced economies. Both perspectives—but especially the first—often omit the historical context and, particularly, the post‐1979 steady fall in the value of the state pension as a proportion of earnings and the resulting increasing dependence on means‐tested benefits. The key insight of the Turner report was that failure to reverse this trend would further erode any incentive to save for lower‐ and middle‐income earners. Reforms that solely focus on the short‐term impacts on current pensioners, rich and poor, risk long‐term damage.","PeriodicalId":47439,"journal":{"name":"Political Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unlocking the Pensions Debate: The Origins and Future of the ‘Triple Lock’\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Portes\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1467-923x.13330\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The ‘triple lock’ mechanism governing the uprating of state pensions is often framed as a transfer from workers to mostly well‐off pensioners, driven by the latter's outsize political influence. Others note that pensioner poverty remains widespread and that the UK state pension remains relatively low compared to other advanced economies. Both perspectives—but especially the first—often omit the historical context and, particularly, the post‐1979 steady fall in the value of the state pension as a proportion of earnings and the resulting increasing dependence on means‐tested benefits. The key insight of the Turner report was that failure to reverse this trend would further erode any incentive to save for lower‐ and middle‐income earners. Reforms that solely focus on the short‐term impacts on current pensioners, rich and poor, risk long‐term damage.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Political Quarterly\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Political Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923x.13330\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923x.13330","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

管理国家养老金升级的“三重锁”机制通常被定义为从工人到大多数富裕的养老金领取者的转移,由后者的巨大政治影响力驱动。其他人指出,领取养老金的人仍然普遍贫困,与其他发达经济体相比,英国的国家养老金仍然相对较低。这两种观点——尤其是第一种观点——往往忽略了历史背景,尤其是1979年后国家养老金占收入比例的稳步下降,以及由此导致的对经济状况调查福利的日益依赖。特纳报告的关键观点是,如果不能扭转这一趋势,将进一步削弱中低收入者储蓄的动力。如果改革只关注对现有养老金领取者(无论贫富)的短期影响,可能会造成长期损害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Unlocking the Pensions Debate: The Origins and Future of the ‘Triple Lock’
Abstract The ‘triple lock’ mechanism governing the uprating of state pensions is often framed as a transfer from workers to mostly well‐off pensioners, driven by the latter's outsize political influence. Others note that pensioner poverty remains widespread and that the UK state pension remains relatively low compared to other advanced economies. Both perspectives—but especially the first—often omit the historical context and, particularly, the post‐1979 steady fall in the value of the state pension as a proportion of earnings and the resulting increasing dependence on means‐tested benefits. The key insight of the Turner report was that failure to reverse this trend would further erode any incentive to save for lower‐ and middle‐income earners. Reforms that solely focus on the short‐term impacts on current pensioners, rich and poor, risk long‐term damage.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Political Quarterly
Political Quarterly POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
105
期刊介绍: Since its foundation in 1930, The Political Quarterly has explored and debated the key issues of the day. It is dedicated to political and social reform and has long acted as a conduit between policy-makers, commentators and academics. The Political Quarterly addresses current issues through serious and thought-provoking articles, written in clear jargon-free English."The Political Quarterly plays host to some of the best writing about both topical issues and underlying trends in UK and European politics"Professor Lord Raymond Plant
期刊最新文献
Greece: The Return of the Right Unlocking the Pensions Debate: The Origins and Future of the ‘Triple Lock’ Growthmanship in the Twenty‐First Century1 Introduction: Scottish Politics After Sturgeon Democracy: often in private hands
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1