uLCDM和xcdm中的体积流、哈勃常数和sigma8张力

Q4 Physics and Astronomy Iranian Journal of Physics Research Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.47176/ijpr.23.1.31667
{"title":"uLCDM和xcdm中的体积流、哈勃常数和sigma8张力","authors":"","doi":"10.47176/ijpr.23.1.31667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The standard model of cosmology,, has been successful in describing many observations. With the improvement of the number and the accuracy of observations, some inconsistencies among key cosmological parameters of the model have emerged. Many alternative models are proposed to alleviate these tensions. On the other hand, some observations of peculiar velocity show higher values than expected in a universe which may contradict the cosmological principle. In this work, we used linear perturbation theory to measure bulk flow and parameter in two alternative cosmological models and XCDM. We compared measured bulk flows with the predictions and some observations. We did a analysis to see which model is preferred by data. We find that model predicts higher bulk flows and is more consistent with observational data but does not reduce tension. Bulk flows measured in the XCDM model are lower compared to . However, this model can reconcile tension.","PeriodicalId":38961,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Physics Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The bulk flow in uLCDM and XCDMand the Hubble constant and sigma8 tensions\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.47176/ijpr.23.1.31667\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The standard model of cosmology,, has been successful in describing many observations. With the improvement of the number and the accuracy of observations, some inconsistencies among key cosmological parameters of the model have emerged. Many alternative models are proposed to alleviate these tensions. On the other hand, some observations of peculiar velocity show higher values than expected in a universe which may contradict the cosmological principle. In this work, we used linear perturbation theory to measure bulk flow and parameter in two alternative cosmological models and XCDM. We compared measured bulk flows with the predictions and some observations. We did a analysis to see which model is preferred by data. We find that model predicts higher bulk flows and is more consistent with observational data but does not reduce tension. Bulk flows measured in the XCDM model are lower compared to . However, this model can reconcile tension.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38961,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian Journal of Physics Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian Journal of Physics Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47176/ijpr.23.1.31667\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Physics and Astronomy\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Physics Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47176/ijpr.23.1.31667","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Physics and Astronomy","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

宇宙学的标准模型已经成功地描述了许多观测结果。随着观测数量和精度的提高,模型的关键宇宙学参数之间出现了一些不一致。提出了许多替代模型来缓解这些紧张关系。另一方面,在一个可能与宇宙学原理相矛盾的宇宙中,一些特殊速度的观测显示出比预期更高的值。在这项工作中,我们使用线性微扰理论测量了两个备选宇宙学模型和XCDM的体积流量和参数。我们将测量的总体流量与预测和一些观察结果进行了比较。我们做了一个分析,看看哪种模型更受数据青睐。我们发现该模型预测了更高的体积流量,与观测数据更加一致,但没有降低张力。在XCDM模型中测量的总体流量比。然而,这种模式可以调和紧张关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The bulk flow in uLCDM and XCDMand the Hubble constant and sigma8 tensions
The standard model of cosmology,, has been successful in describing many observations. With the improvement of the number and the accuracy of observations, some inconsistencies among key cosmological parameters of the model have emerged. Many alternative models are proposed to alleviate these tensions. On the other hand, some observations of peculiar velocity show higher values than expected in a universe which may contradict the cosmological principle. In this work, we used linear perturbation theory to measure bulk flow and parameter in two alternative cosmological models and XCDM. We compared measured bulk flows with the predictions and some observations. We did a analysis to see which model is preferred by data. We find that model predicts higher bulk flows and is more consistent with observational data but does not reduce tension. Bulk flows measured in the XCDM model are lower compared to . However, this model can reconcile tension.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Iranian Journal of Physics Research
Iranian Journal of Physics Research Physics and Astronomy-Physics and Astronomy (all)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Investigating the giant magnetoresistance in a two-dimensional square network including two materials with a diagonal boundary Study of hadron production through pair annihilation in the noncommutative standard model The bulk flow in uLCDM and XCDMand the Hubble constant and sigma8 tensions Investigation of localized wave function in bilayer phosphorene nanoribbon Strong coupling of magnetization dynamics of two antiferromagnetic layers by phonons
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1