应用脑电图(EEG)检测癫痫发作的自动机器学习(AutoML)工具比较

IF 2.6 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computers Pub Date : 2023-09-29 DOI:10.3390/computers12100197
Swetha Lenkala, Revathi Marry, Susmitha Reddy Gopovaram, Tahir Cetin Akinci, Oguzhan Topsakal
{"title":"应用脑电图(EEG)检测癫痫发作的自动机器学习(AutoML)工具比较","authors":"Swetha Lenkala, Revathi Marry, Susmitha Reddy Gopovaram, Tahir Cetin Akinci, Oguzhan Topsakal","doi":"10.3390/computers12100197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Epilepsy is a neurological disease characterized by recurrent seizures caused by abnormal electrical activity in the brain. One of the methods used to diagnose epilepsy is through electroencephalogram (EEG) analysis. EEG is a non-invasive medical test for quantifying electrical activity in the brain. Applying machine learning (ML) to EEG data for epilepsy diagnosis has the potential to be more accurate and efficient. However, expert knowledge is required to set up the ML model with correct hyperparameters. Automated machine learning (AutoML) tools aim to make ML more accessible to non-experts and automate many ML processes to create a high-performing ML model. This article explores the use of automated machine learning (AutoML) tools for diagnosing epilepsy using electroencephalogram (EEG) data. The study compares the performance of three different AutoML tools, AutoGluon, Auto-Sklearn, and Amazon Sagemaker, on three different datasets from the UC Irvine ML Repository, Bonn EEG time series dataset, and Zenodo. Performance measures used for evaluation include accuracy, F1 score, recall, and precision. The results show that all three AutoML tools were able to generate high-performing ML models for the diagnosis of epilepsy. The generated ML models perform better when the training dataset is larger in size. Amazon Sagemaker and Auto-Sklearn performed better with smaller datasets. This is the first study to compare several AutoML tools and shows that AutoML tools can be utilized to create well-performing solutions for the diagnosis of epilepsy via processing hard-to-analyze EEG timeseries data.","PeriodicalId":46292,"journal":{"name":"Computers","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Automated Machine Learning (AutoML) Tools for Epileptic Seizure Detection Using Electroencephalograms (EEG)\",\"authors\":\"Swetha Lenkala, Revathi Marry, Susmitha Reddy Gopovaram, Tahir Cetin Akinci, Oguzhan Topsakal\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/computers12100197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Epilepsy is a neurological disease characterized by recurrent seizures caused by abnormal electrical activity in the brain. One of the methods used to diagnose epilepsy is through electroencephalogram (EEG) analysis. EEG is a non-invasive medical test for quantifying electrical activity in the brain. Applying machine learning (ML) to EEG data for epilepsy diagnosis has the potential to be more accurate and efficient. However, expert knowledge is required to set up the ML model with correct hyperparameters. Automated machine learning (AutoML) tools aim to make ML more accessible to non-experts and automate many ML processes to create a high-performing ML model. This article explores the use of automated machine learning (AutoML) tools for diagnosing epilepsy using electroencephalogram (EEG) data. The study compares the performance of three different AutoML tools, AutoGluon, Auto-Sklearn, and Amazon Sagemaker, on three different datasets from the UC Irvine ML Repository, Bonn EEG time series dataset, and Zenodo. Performance measures used for evaluation include accuracy, F1 score, recall, and precision. The results show that all three AutoML tools were able to generate high-performing ML models for the diagnosis of epilepsy. The generated ML models perform better when the training dataset is larger in size. Amazon Sagemaker and Auto-Sklearn performed better with smaller datasets. This is the first study to compare several AutoML tools and shows that AutoML tools can be utilized to create well-performing solutions for the diagnosis of epilepsy via processing hard-to-analyze EEG timeseries data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46292,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/computers12100197\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/computers12100197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

癫痫是一种神经系统疾病,其特征是由大脑异常电活动引起的反复发作。诊断癫痫的方法之一是通过脑电图(EEG)分析。脑电图是一种量化脑电活动的非侵入性医学测试。将机器学习(ML)应用于脑电图数据进行癫痫诊断有可能更加准确和高效。然而,建立具有正确超参数的机器学习模型需要专家知识。自动化机器学习(AutoML)工具旨在使非专家更容易访问机器学习,并自动化许多机器学习过程以创建高性能机器学习模型。本文探讨了使用自动机器学习(AutoML)工具使用脑电图(EEG)数据诊断癫痫。该研究比较了三种不同的AutoML工具(AutoGluon、Auto-Sklearn和Amazon Sagemaker)在来自UC Irvine ML Repository、Bonn EEG时间序列数据集和Zenodo的三种不同数据集上的性能。用于评估的性能度量包括准确性、F1分数、召回率和精度。结果表明,这三种AutoML工具都能够生成用于癫痫诊断的高性能ML模型。当训练数据集更大时,生成的ML模型表现更好。Amazon Sagemaker和Auto-Sklearn在较小的数据集上表现更好。这是第一个比较几种AutoML工具的研究,并表明AutoML工具可以通过处理难以分析的EEG时间序列数据来创建性能良好的癫痫诊断解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Automated Machine Learning (AutoML) Tools for Epileptic Seizure Detection Using Electroencephalograms (EEG)
Epilepsy is a neurological disease characterized by recurrent seizures caused by abnormal electrical activity in the brain. One of the methods used to diagnose epilepsy is through electroencephalogram (EEG) analysis. EEG is a non-invasive medical test for quantifying electrical activity in the brain. Applying machine learning (ML) to EEG data for epilepsy diagnosis has the potential to be more accurate and efficient. However, expert knowledge is required to set up the ML model with correct hyperparameters. Automated machine learning (AutoML) tools aim to make ML more accessible to non-experts and automate many ML processes to create a high-performing ML model. This article explores the use of automated machine learning (AutoML) tools for diagnosing epilepsy using electroencephalogram (EEG) data. The study compares the performance of three different AutoML tools, AutoGluon, Auto-Sklearn, and Amazon Sagemaker, on three different datasets from the UC Irvine ML Repository, Bonn EEG time series dataset, and Zenodo. Performance measures used for evaluation include accuracy, F1 score, recall, and precision. The results show that all three AutoML tools were able to generate high-performing ML models for the diagnosis of epilepsy. The generated ML models perform better when the training dataset is larger in size. Amazon Sagemaker and Auto-Sklearn performed better with smaller datasets. This is the first study to compare several AutoML tools and shows that AutoML tools can be utilized to create well-performing solutions for the diagnosis of epilepsy via processing hard-to-analyze EEG timeseries data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computers
Computers COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.60%
发文量
153
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Advanced Road Safety: Collective Perception for Probability of Collision Estimation of Connected Vehicles Forecasting of Bitcoin Illiquidity Using High-Dimensional and Textual Features Mining Negative Associations from Medical Databases Considering Frequent, Regular, Closed and Maximal Patterns Faraway, so Close: Perceptions of the Metaverse on the Edge of Madness Blockchain-Powered Gaming: Bridging Entertainment with Serious Game Objectives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1