实体与主体,从康德到黑格尔

IF 0.6 0 PHILOSOPHY Studia Philosophica Kantiana Pub Date : 2023-06-08 DOI:10.5380/sk.v18i3.90193
Christian Klotz
{"title":"实体与主体,从康德到黑格尔","authors":"Christian Klotz","doi":"10.5380/sk.v18i3.90193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the Preface of the  Phenomenology o Spirit , Hegel famously claims that “everything turns on grasping and expressing the True, not only as  Substance , but equally as  Subject ”. This article aims to put Hegel’s claim into the context of the preceding discussion about the relation between the concepts of subject and substance in Kant and Fichte. Whereas Kant adopted a concept of subject which goes together with agnosticism regarding the question if subjects are substances, Fichte transformed the concept of subject into a concept which signifies a peculiar ontological status, that is, a mode of being which is characterized by the self-positing nature which distinguishes subjects from things. At the same time, Fichte understands the concept of substance as being subordinated to that of subject. It is the central thesis of the article that the Hegelian claim presupposes the Fichtean ontologicalization of the concept of subject. However, it is also argued that Hegel, in contrast to Fichte, construes the concepts of subject and of substance as being equally original.","PeriodicalId":40123,"journal":{"name":"Studia Philosophica Kantiana","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Substance and Subject, from Kant to Hegel\",\"authors\":\"Christian Klotz\",\"doi\":\"10.5380/sk.v18i3.90193\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the Preface of the  Phenomenology o Spirit , Hegel famously claims that “everything turns on grasping and expressing the True, not only as  Substance , but equally as  Subject ”. This article aims to put Hegel’s claim into the context of the preceding discussion about the relation between the concepts of subject and substance in Kant and Fichte. Whereas Kant adopted a concept of subject which goes together with agnosticism regarding the question if subjects are substances, Fichte transformed the concept of subject into a concept which signifies a peculiar ontological status, that is, a mode of being which is characterized by the self-positing nature which distinguishes subjects from things. At the same time, Fichte understands the concept of substance as being subordinated to that of subject. It is the central thesis of the article that the Hegelian claim presupposes the Fichtean ontologicalization of the concept of subject. However, it is also argued that Hegel, in contrast to Fichte, construes the concepts of subject and of substance as being equally original.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studia Philosophica Kantiana\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studia Philosophica Kantiana\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5380/sk.v18i3.90193\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Philosophica Kantiana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5380/sk.v18i3.90193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在《精神现象学》的序言中,黑格尔有一句名言:“一切都在于把握和表达真理,不仅作为实体,而且同样作为主体。”本文旨在将黑格尔的主张置于康德和费希特之前关于主体和实体概念之间关系的讨论的背景中。康德在主体是否为实体的问题上采用了与不可知论相结合的主体概念,而费希特则把主体概念转变为一种特殊的本体论地位的概念,即一种以主体与事物相区别的自我设定的本质为特征的存在方式。同时,费希特将实体概念理解为从属于主体的概念。本文的中心论点是,黑格尔的主张是以费希特的主体概念本体论为前提的。然而,也有人认为,与费希特相反,黑格尔认为主体和实体的概念同样是原创的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Substance and Subject, from Kant to Hegel
In the Preface of the  Phenomenology o Spirit , Hegel famously claims that “everything turns on grasping and expressing the True, not only as  Substance , but equally as  Subject ”. This article aims to put Hegel’s claim into the context of the preceding discussion about the relation between the concepts of subject and substance in Kant and Fichte. Whereas Kant adopted a concept of subject which goes together with agnosticism regarding the question if subjects are substances, Fichte transformed the concept of subject into a concept which signifies a peculiar ontological status, that is, a mode of being which is characterized by the self-positing nature which distinguishes subjects from things. At the same time, Fichte understands the concept of substance as being subordinated to that of subject. It is the central thesis of the article that the Hegelian claim presupposes the Fichtean ontologicalization of the concept of subject. However, it is also argued that Hegel, in contrast to Fichte, construes the concepts of subject and of substance as being equally original.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Action irrationality, systemic practical irrationality, and a Kantian remedy the remedy in Kant Revisiting the Kantian legacy in Habermas: the philosophical project of modernity and decolonial critiques to rationality and cosmopolitanism Living Honestly and Killing Honorably. Ehre and Ehrbarkeit in the Metaphysics of Morals The Kantian view of dark representations and their function in practical life, according to the anthropological notes of the Critical Period “The taking-something-to-be-true [that] cannot be communicated”: remarks on the (lack of) communicability to understand the problem of social irrationality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1