21世纪后前卫艺术与德国新巴洛克艺术

Vasyl Babukhivskyi
{"title":"21世纪后前卫艺术与德国新巴洛克艺术","authors":"Vasyl Babukhivskyi","doi":"10.32461/2226-3209.3.2023.289847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this work is to identify stylistic clarifications regarding such an all-encompassing and extremely influential direction from the last century as neo-baroque, which was perceived as an offshoot of the overall neoclassicism of the 20th century, taking into account the post-avant-garde contribution from the 1970s and the post-post-avant-garde (\"neo-post-avant-garde\") addition from 2010s – in the conditions of the German music world. The latter has held basic positions in art music since the times of the Viennese classicism, significantly supplying the repertoire of performance even today. The methodological basis of the study is the intonation approach, as it was noted in the works of B. Asafiev's followers in Ukraine (see the publications of D. Androsova, O. Markova, O. Muravska, and others), as well as based on the development of instrumental performance of the Odesa school (works by Z. Bupkatskyi, K. Muhlberg, other scholars). The scientific novelty of the work is noted due to the originality of the presentation of the meaning of the stylistic diffusions of instrumental art from the 20th to the 21st centuries, which made it possible to revive in the performance of works that bypassed artistry in favour of either church aestheticism of expression or frankly traditionalist thinking, which was not associated with ideas about the stylistic dynamism of German music of the last two centuries. Conclusions. The neo-baroque stylistic eclecticism of German art from the 20th century was based on the contributions of the stylistic extremism of P. Hindemith, which bypassed the \"soft\" detections in the works of A. Zemlinsky, Z. Wagner, F. Schmidt, and more, leading to the \"neo-Schubertianism\" of V. Rimm, which became the recognised leader of the German musical world at the break of the post-avant-garde and post-post-avant-garde heritages. Performance practice, performing the works of German post-avant-garde composers at the level of B. Zimmerman, J. Widman, A. Raiman, and other masters, organically combined it with the revival of the legacy of A. Zemlinsky, F. Schreker, Z. Wagner, F. Schmidt, as well as composers of the Baroque era – J. Molter, H. Telemann, and so on, whose thinking did not coincide with the criteria of the author's work of the New Age, but corresponded to the neo-baroque filling of the post-avant-garde with compositions marked by church aestheticism in bypassing the criterion of artistry, which we denote by the term \"post-avant-garde neo-baroque\" in music.
 Keywords: baroque, neo-baroque of the 20th century, neoclassicism, post-avant-garde neo-baroque, German style in music, style of the era, post-avant-garde.","PeriodicalId":497790,"journal":{"name":"Vìsnik Deržavnoï akademìï kerìvnih kadrìv kulʹturi ì mistectv","volume":"30 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post-Avant-Garde and German Neo-Baroque of the 21st Century\",\"authors\":\"Vasyl Babukhivskyi\",\"doi\":\"10.32461/2226-3209.3.2023.289847\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this work is to identify stylistic clarifications regarding such an all-encompassing and extremely influential direction from the last century as neo-baroque, which was perceived as an offshoot of the overall neoclassicism of the 20th century, taking into account the post-avant-garde contribution from the 1970s and the post-post-avant-garde (\\\"neo-post-avant-garde\\\") addition from 2010s – in the conditions of the German music world. The latter has held basic positions in art music since the times of the Viennese classicism, significantly supplying the repertoire of performance even today. The methodological basis of the study is the intonation approach, as it was noted in the works of B. Asafiev's followers in Ukraine (see the publications of D. Androsova, O. Markova, O. Muravska, and others), as well as based on the development of instrumental performance of the Odesa school (works by Z. Bupkatskyi, K. Muhlberg, other scholars). The scientific novelty of the work is noted due to the originality of the presentation of the meaning of the stylistic diffusions of instrumental art from the 20th to the 21st centuries, which made it possible to revive in the performance of works that bypassed artistry in favour of either church aestheticism of expression or frankly traditionalist thinking, which was not associated with ideas about the stylistic dynamism of German music of the last two centuries. Conclusions. The neo-baroque stylistic eclecticism of German art from the 20th century was based on the contributions of the stylistic extremism of P. Hindemith, which bypassed the \\\"soft\\\" detections in the works of A. Zemlinsky, Z. Wagner, F. Schmidt, and more, leading to the \\\"neo-Schubertianism\\\" of V. Rimm, which became the recognised leader of the German musical world at the break of the post-avant-garde and post-post-avant-garde heritages. Performance practice, performing the works of German post-avant-garde composers at the level of B. Zimmerman, J. Widman, A. Raiman, and other masters, organically combined it with the revival of the legacy of A. Zemlinsky, F. Schreker, Z. Wagner, F. Schmidt, as well as composers of the Baroque era – J. Molter, H. Telemann, and so on, whose thinking did not coincide with the criteria of the author's work of the New Age, but corresponded to the neo-baroque filling of the post-avant-garde with compositions marked by church aestheticism in bypassing the criterion of artistry, which we denote by the term \\\"post-avant-garde neo-baroque\\\" in music.
 Keywords: baroque, neo-baroque of the 20th century, neoclassicism, post-avant-garde neo-baroque, German style in music, style of the era, post-avant-garde.\",\"PeriodicalId\":497790,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vìsnik Deržavnoï akademìï kerìvnih kadrìv kulʹturi ì mistectv\",\"volume\":\"30 3\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vìsnik Deržavnoï akademìï kerìvnih kadrìv kulʹturi ì mistectv\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.3.2023.289847\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vìsnik Deržavnoï akademìï kerìvnih kadrìv kulʹturi ì mistectv","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.3.2023.289847","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项工作的目的是确定风格上的澄清,从上个世纪开始,新巴洛克风格被认为是20世纪整体新古典主义的一个分支,同时考虑到20世纪70年代的后前卫贡献和2010年代的后前卫(“新后前卫”)-在德国音乐世界的条件下。自维也纳古典主义时代以来,后者在艺术音乐中占据了基本地位,甚至在今天也重要地提供了表演曲目。该研究的方法论基础是语调方法,正如B. Asafiev在乌克兰的追随者的作品中所指出的那样(参见D. Androsova, O. Markova, O. Muravska等人的出版物),以及基于敖德萨学派器乐演奏的发展(Z. Bupkatskyi, K. Muhlberg等学者的作品)。由于从20世纪到21世纪器乐艺术风格扩散的意义呈现的独创性,该作品的科学新颖性被注意到,这使得有可能在绕过艺术性的作品的表演中复兴,这些作品有利于教会审美主义的表达或坦率地说传统主义思想,这与过去两个世纪德国音乐的风格活力无关。结论。20世纪以来德国艺术的新巴洛克风格折衷主义是基于P.欣德米特风格极端主义的贡献,它绕过了A.泽姆林斯基、Z.瓦格纳、F.施密特等人作品中的“软”发现,导致了V.里姆的“新舒伯特主义”,他成为德国音乐界公认的领袖,打破了后前卫和后前卫的遗产。演奏实践,在B.齐默尔曼、J.威德曼、A.赖曼等大师的水平上演奏德国后前卫作曲家的作品,将其与A.泽姆林斯基、F.施雷克、Z.瓦格纳、F.施密特以及巴洛克时代的作曲家J.莫尔特、H.泰勒曼等思想不符合笔者新时代作品标准的遗产的复兴有机地结合起来;而是与以教堂唯美主义为标志的后前卫音乐的新巴洛克式填充物相对应,这种填充物绕过了艺术标准,我们用音乐中的“后前卫新巴洛克”一词来表示。关键词:巴洛克,20世纪新巴洛克,新古典主义,后前卫新巴洛克,德国音乐风格,时代风格,后前卫。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Post-Avant-Garde and German Neo-Baroque of the 21st Century
The purpose of this work is to identify stylistic clarifications regarding such an all-encompassing and extremely influential direction from the last century as neo-baroque, which was perceived as an offshoot of the overall neoclassicism of the 20th century, taking into account the post-avant-garde contribution from the 1970s and the post-post-avant-garde ("neo-post-avant-garde") addition from 2010s – in the conditions of the German music world. The latter has held basic positions in art music since the times of the Viennese classicism, significantly supplying the repertoire of performance even today. The methodological basis of the study is the intonation approach, as it was noted in the works of B. Asafiev's followers in Ukraine (see the publications of D. Androsova, O. Markova, O. Muravska, and others), as well as based on the development of instrumental performance of the Odesa school (works by Z. Bupkatskyi, K. Muhlberg, other scholars). The scientific novelty of the work is noted due to the originality of the presentation of the meaning of the stylistic diffusions of instrumental art from the 20th to the 21st centuries, which made it possible to revive in the performance of works that bypassed artistry in favour of either church aestheticism of expression or frankly traditionalist thinking, which was not associated with ideas about the stylistic dynamism of German music of the last two centuries. Conclusions. The neo-baroque stylistic eclecticism of German art from the 20th century was based on the contributions of the stylistic extremism of P. Hindemith, which bypassed the "soft" detections in the works of A. Zemlinsky, Z. Wagner, F. Schmidt, and more, leading to the "neo-Schubertianism" of V. Rimm, which became the recognised leader of the German musical world at the break of the post-avant-garde and post-post-avant-garde heritages. Performance practice, performing the works of German post-avant-garde composers at the level of B. Zimmerman, J. Widman, A. Raiman, and other masters, organically combined it with the revival of the legacy of A. Zemlinsky, F. Schreker, Z. Wagner, F. Schmidt, as well as composers of the Baroque era – J. Molter, H. Telemann, and so on, whose thinking did not coincide with the criteria of the author's work of the New Age, but corresponded to the neo-baroque filling of the post-avant-garde with compositions marked by church aestheticism in bypassing the criterion of artistry, which we denote by the term "post-avant-garde neo-baroque" in music. Keywords: baroque, neo-baroque of the 20th century, neoclassicism, post-avant-garde neo-baroque, German style in music, style of the era, post-avant-garde.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Television as a Factor in Formation of Common Cultural Space and Integration of Society Audiovisual Culture of Participation: The Role of Social Media The Impact of YouTube Video Hosting on the Children's Segment of Ukrainian Audiovisual Culture Monumental Art by F. Tetianych in the Context of Transavant-Garde Traditions Structural and Stylistic Components of the Comics in the Real Space of Formation of Spectacular Culture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1