[皮下浸润利多卡因伴或不伴肾上腺素或奥尼加压素后的皮肤血流量]。

IF 1.9 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Regional-Anaesthesie Pub Date : 1990-06-01
H Fruhstorfer, H Nolte, U Ziegenhagel
{"title":"[皮下浸润利多卡因伴或不伴肾上腺素或奥尼加压素后的皮肤血流量]。","authors":"H Fruhstorfer,&nbsp;H Nolte,&nbsp;U Ziegenhagel","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The addition of ornipressin to local anesthetics increases the duration of regional anesthesia. A dose of 0.1 unit/ml produces an increase in nerve block duration comparable to adrenaline 5 micrograms/ml. In order to suppress intraoperative bleeding higher concentrations of ornipressin have been used in infiltration anesthesia. This study was designed to examine whether an increase in ornipressin concentration above 0.1 unit/ml causes a further reduction in cutaneous blood flow. Twelve volunteers took part in the study. They received intracutaneous infiltrations of 4 ml lidocaine 0.5% in the volar aspects of both forearms (Fig. 1). The solution was either plain (= Lido) or contained adrenaline 5 micrograms/ml (Lido + A), or ornipressin 0.1 unit/ml (Lido + P1) or 0.2 unit/ml (Lido + P2). Blood flow was measured with a laser Doppler flowmeter; before the infiltration the skin was locally heated to 40 degrees C in order to obtain maximal perfusion (Flow 100); this temperature was maintained throughout the measuring period. The minimal flow after infiltration was calculated as a percentage of Flow 100. Lido caused a significant decrease in flow to 59 +/- 25% (M +/- SD). Lido + A, Lido + P1 and Lido + P2 caused further significant flow reductions, to 19 +/- 21%, 23 +/- 16% and 26 +/- 23%, respectively (Figs. 3, 4). The latency of maximal flow reduction did not differ between the four solutions (Fig. 5). The results show that in infiltration anesthesia an increase in ornipressin concentration above 0.1 unit/ml does not improve superficial vasoconstriction.</p>","PeriodicalId":77604,"journal":{"name":"Regional-Anaesthesie","volume":"13 4","pages":"97-100"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"1990-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Cutaneous blood flow following subcutaneous infiltration of lidocaine with and without the addition of adrenaline or ornipressin].\",\"authors\":\"H Fruhstorfer,&nbsp;H Nolte,&nbsp;U Ziegenhagel\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The addition of ornipressin to local anesthetics increases the duration of regional anesthesia. A dose of 0.1 unit/ml produces an increase in nerve block duration comparable to adrenaline 5 micrograms/ml. In order to suppress intraoperative bleeding higher concentrations of ornipressin have been used in infiltration anesthesia. This study was designed to examine whether an increase in ornipressin concentration above 0.1 unit/ml causes a further reduction in cutaneous blood flow. Twelve volunteers took part in the study. They received intracutaneous infiltrations of 4 ml lidocaine 0.5% in the volar aspects of both forearms (Fig. 1). The solution was either plain (= Lido) or contained adrenaline 5 micrograms/ml (Lido + A), or ornipressin 0.1 unit/ml (Lido + P1) or 0.2 unit/ml (Lido + P2). Blood flow was measured with a laser Doppler flowmeter; before the infiltration the skin was locally heated to 40 degrees C in order to obtain maximal perfusion (Flow 100); this temperature was maintained throughout the measuring period. The minimal flow after infiltration was calculated as a percentage of Flow 100. Lido caused a significant decrease in flow to 59 +/- 25% (M +/- SD). Lido + A, Lido + P1 and Lido + P2 caused further significant flow reductions, to 19 +/- 21%, 23 +/- 16% and 26 +/- 23%, respectively (Figs. 3, 4). The latency of maximal flow reduction did not differ between the four solutions (Fig. 5). The results show that in infiltration anesthesia an increase in ornipressin concentration above 0.1 unit/ml does not improve superficial vasoconstriction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regional-Anaesthesie\",\"volume\":\"13 4\",\"pages\":\"97-100\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regional-Anaesthesie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional-Anaesthesie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在局麻药中加入奥尼加压素可增加区域麻醉的持续时间。0.1单位/毫升的剂量增加的神经阻滞持续时间与肾上腺素5微克/毫升相当。为了抑制术中出血,高浓度的奥尼加压素已被用于浸润麻醉。本研究旨在研究奥尼加压素浓度增加超过0.1单位/ml是否会导致皮肤血流量进一步减少。12名志愿者参加了这项研究。他们在前臂掌侧皮内浸润4ml 0.5%利多卡因(图1)。溶液要么是普通的(= Lido),要么含有5微克/毫升的肾上腺素(Lido + A),要么含有0.1单位/毫升的奥尼普利辛(Lido + P1)或0.2单位/毫升的(Lido + P2)。采用激光多普勒血流仪测量血流;浸润前将皮肤局部加热至40℃以获得最大灌注(流量100);这个温度在整个测量期间保持不变。以流量100的百分比计算入渗后的最小流量。Lido使流量显著降低至59 +/- 25% (M +/- SD)。Lido + A、Lido + P1和Lido + P2进一步显著减少血流,分别达到19 +/- 21%、23 +/- 16%和26 +/- 23%(图3、4)。最大血流减少的潜伏期在四种溶液之间没有差异(图5)。结果表明,在浸润麻醉中,奥尼压素浓度增加到0.1单位/ml以上并不能改善浅血管收缩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Cutaneous blood flow following subcutaneous infiltration of lidocaine with and without the addition of adrenaline or ornipressin].

The addition of ornipressin to local anesthetics increases the duration of regional anesthesia. A dose of 0.1 unit/ml produces an increase in nerve block duration comparable to adrenaline 5 micrograms/ml. In order to suppress intraoperative bleeding higher concentrations of ornipressin have been used in infiltration anesthesia. This study was designed to examine whether an increase in ornipressin concentration above 0.1 unit/ml causes a further reduction in cutaneous blood flow. Twelve volunteers took part in the study. They received intracutaneous infiltrations of 4 ml lidocaine 0.5% in the volar aspects of both forearms (Fig. 1). The solution was either plain (= Lido) or contained adrenaline 5 micrograms/ml (Lido + A), or ornipressin 0.1 unit/ml (Lido + P1) or 0.2 unit/ml (Lido + P2). Blood flow was measured with a laser Doppler flowmeter; before the infiltration the skin was locally heated to 40 degrees C in order to obtain maximal perfusion (Flow 100); this temperature was maintained throughout the measuring period. The minimal flow after infiltration was calculated as a percentage of Flow 100. Lido caused a significant decrease in flow to 59 +/- 25% (M +/- SD). Lido + A, Lido + P1 and Lido + P2 caused further significant flow reductions, to 19 +/- 21%, 23 +/- 16% and 26 +/- 23%, respectively (Figs. 3, 4). The latency of maximal flow reduction did not differ between the four solutions (Fig. 5). The results show that in infiltration anesthesia an increase in ornipressin concentration above 0.1 unit/ml does not improve superficial vasoconstriction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[An epidural spinal abscess as a lethal complication of peridural anesthesia]. [Knotting of a peridural catheter]. [A simple technique for estimating the level of analgesia in regional anesthesia]. [CSE--the combination of spinal and epidural anesthesia]. [Comments on the paper by R. Schürg et al. Maternal and neonatal plasma concentrations of bupivacaine during peridural anesthesia for cesarean section].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1