从经济理论看世界银行发展话语的演变

IF 0.1 Q4 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Insan & Toplum-The Journal of Humanity & Society Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.12658/m0681
Betül SARI AKSAKAL
{"title":"从经济理论看世界银行发展话语的演变","authors":"Betül SARI AKSAKAL","doi":"10.12658/m0681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Continuous impact of the international institutions and organizations on the world economic order would not be repudiated. One of them is the World Bank (WB). Bank was established for the purpose of reconstruction of the Western Europe, which was destroyed subsequent to the Second World War, and it also has the characteristic of being an institution determining the development discourses in the world. Bank specifies its development discourse in line with the evolution of the economic theories. On the other hand, it also contributes to the evolution of the economic theory by means of the development discourses it composes. Therefore, it is possible to make mention about the existence of a two-way process between development discourse of the Bank and the evolution of economic theories. This two-way process has been illuminated in this study. It has been demonstrated that Bank has developed a discourse in parallel with the basic principles of Neoclassical theory, Keynesian theory, Harrod-Domar growth model and Neo-Marxist theory from its foundation until the mid-1960s. Since the 1970s, Bank has adopted a discourse based on neoliberal theory as a result of the Keynesian theory’s responseless to the particular structural problems. The rise of the New Institutional Theory in the 1990s brought about Bank’s adoption of discourse which focuses on the state-market cooperation. It would be feasible to claim that Bank has carved out a discourse which hinges on sustainable development in period from the 2000s to the present. However, it is thought that the discourse being constituted both in 1990s and in 2000s has not been parted from the core of the neoliberal theory.","PeriodicalId":53769,"journal":{"name":"Insan & Toplum-The Journal of Humanity & Society","volume":"97 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reading the Evolution of the World Bank’s Development Discourse on the Economic Theory\",\"authors\":\"Betül SARI AKSAKAL\",\"doi\":\"10.12658/m0681\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Continuous impact of the international institutions and organizations on the world economic order would not be repudiated. One of them is the World Bank (WB). Bank was established for the purpose of reconstruction of the Western Europe, which was destroyed subsequent to the Second World War, and it also has the characteristic of being an institution determining the development discourses in the world. Bank specifies its development discourse in line with the evolution of the economic theories. On the other hand, it also contributes to the evolution of the economic theory by means of the development discourses it composes. Therefore, it is possible to make mention about the existence of a two-way process between development discourse of the Bank and the evolution of economic theories. This two-way process has been illuminated in this study. It has been demonstrated that Bank has developed a discourse in parallel with the basic principles of Neoclassical theory, Keynesian theory, Harrod-Domar growth model and Neo-Marxist theory from its foundation until the mid-1960s. Since the 1970s, Bank has adopted a discourse based on neoliberal theory as a result of the Keynesian theory’s responseless to the particular structural problems. The rise of the New Institutional Theory in the 1990s brought about Bank’s adoption of discourse which focuses on the state-market cooperation. It would be feasible to claim that Bank has carved out a discourse which hinges on sustainable development in period from the 2000s to the present. However, it is thought that the discourse being constituted both in 1990s and in 2000s has not been parted from the core of the neoliberal theory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Insan & Toplum-The Journal of Humanity & Society\",\"volume\":\"97 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Insan & Toplum-The Journal of Humanity & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12658/m0681\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insan & Toplum-The Journal of Humanity & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12658/m0681","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

国际机构和组织对世界经济秩序的持续影响是不容否认的。其中之一就是世界银行(WB)。世界银行是为了重建二战后遭到破坏的西欧而成立的,它也具有作为一个决定世界发展话语的机构的特点。银行的发展话语是根据经济理论的演变来界定的。另一方面,它也通过它所构成的发展话语,促进了经济理论的演进。因此,有可能提到世界银行的发展话语与经济理论的演变之间存在一个双向过程。这一双向过程在本研究中得到了阐明。事实证明,从银行建立到20世纪60年代中期,它已经发展了一种与新古典理论、凯恩斯理论、哈罗德-多玛增长模型和新马克思主义理论的基本原则平行的话语。20世纪70年代以来,由于凯恩斯主义理论对特定的结构性问题没有反应,班克采用了一种基于新自由主义理论的话语。20世纪90年代新制度理论的兴起,使世界银行采用了以国家与市场合作为中心的话语。可以说,世界银行开创了一种从2000年代到现在以可持续发展为核心的话语。然而,人们认为,在20世纪90年代和21世纪初形成的话语并没有脱离新自由主义理论的核心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reading the Evolution of the World Bank’s Development Discourse on the Economic Theory
Continuous impact of the international institutions and organizations on the world economic order would not be repudiated. One of them is the World Bank (WB). Bank was established for the purpose of reconstruction of the Western Europe, which was destroyed subsequent to the Second World War, and it also has the characteristic of being an institution determining the development discourses in the world. Bank specifies its development discourse in line with the evolution of the economic theories. On the other hand, it also contributes to the evolution of the economic theory by means of the development discourses it composes. Therefore, it is possible to make mention about the existence of a two-way process between development discourse of the Bank and the evolution of economic theories. This two-way process has been illuminated in this study. It has been demonstrated that Bank has developed a discourse in parallel with the basic principles of Neoclassical theory, Keynesian theory, Harrod-Domar growth model and Neo-Marxist theory from its foundation until the mid-1960s. Since the 1970s, Bank has adopted a discourse based on neoliberal theory as a result of the Keynesian theory’s responseless to the particular structural problems. The rise of the New Institutional Theory in the 1990s brought about Bank’s adoption of discourse which focuses on the state-market cooperation. It would be feasible to claim that Bank has carved out a discourse which hinges on sustainable development in period from the 2000s to the present. However, it is thought that the discourse being constituted both in 1990s and in 2000s has not been parted from the core of the neoliberal theory.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Insan & Toplum-The Journal of Humanity & Society
Insan & Toplum-The Journal of Humanity & Society SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
LGBT Hareketin Gelişimi, Kurumsallaşması ve Batı Medeniyet Projesine Dönüşümü İslam Can & Ejder Ulutaş, Teşhir Toplumu: Bir Duyu Sosyolojisi Denemesi, Ketebe Yayınları, 2021, 188 s. Martha C. Nussbaum, Her Şey Çıkar İçin mi? Demokrasi İnsanlığa Neden İhtiyaç Duyuyor? İrem Sağlamer (Çev.), Sander Yayınları, 2022, 184 s. M. Sami Okumuş, Tarihin Televizyonla İhyası: TRT Tarihi ve Dizi Filmler (1974-2020). Dergâh Yayınları, 2021, 306 s. Hezbollah’s Diversionary War in Lebanon: Continuity and Change in the Threat Perception
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1