声音、残疾和 "生命终结 "研究:将智障人士纳入与死亡和临终有关的定性研究的策略

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities Pub Date : 2023-09-29 DOI:10.1111/jppi.12476
Marissa A Diaz, Carla Sabariego, Jerome E Bickenbach
{"title":"声音、残疾和 \"生命终结 \"研究:将智障人士纳入与死亡和临终有关的定性研究的策略","authors":"Marissa A Diaz,&nbsp;Carla Sabariego,&nbsp;Jerome E Bickenbach","doi":"10.1111/jppi.12476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This brief report proposes strategies to support qualitative research with people with intellectual disabilities on topics related to death and dying. We prepared a scoping review on methodological approaches used for qualitative research on death and dying involving participants with intellectual disabilities and a study on perceived barriers and facilitators to accessing end of life settings, conducted with co-researchers on an online video communication platform. Through conducting these two studies, we found three strategies that we believe will increase the uptake of this research for policymakers, funding bodies and other researchers. The strategies concern research agendas, structured methodological guidance, and allocation of funds. When planning out qualitative research projects about death and dying topics, people with intellectual disabilities must be on the research agendas on topics related to death and dying. To realize this obligation, stakeholders would benefit from structured methodological guidance. The design, planning, and conduct of such studies would benefit greatly from such guidance and would ideally result in the uptake of this type of research. Additionally, proper funding taking into account needed but time-consuming accommodations for participants is necessary. These strategy options aim to increase the amount of qualitative research that includes people with intellectual disabilities as participants.</p>","PeriodicalId":47236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jppi.12476","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Voice, disability and ‘end of life’ research: Strategies for including people with intellectual disabilities in qualitative research related to death and dying\",\"authors\":\"Marissa A Diaz,&nbsp;Carla Sabariego,&nbsp;Jerome E Bickenbach\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jppi.12476\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This brief report proposes strategies to support qualitative research with people with intellectual disabilities on topics related to death and dying. We prepared a scoping review on methodological approaches used for qualitative research on death and dying involving participants with intellectual disabilities and a study on perceived barriers and facilitators to accessing end of life settings, conducted with co-researchers on an online video communication platform. Through conducting these two studies, we found three strategies that we believe will increase the uptake of this research for policymakers, funding bodies and other researchers. The strategies concern research agendas, structured methodological guidance, and allocation of funds. When planning out qualitative research projects about death and dying topics, people with intellectual disabilities must be on the research agendas on topics related to death and dying. To realize this obligation, stakeholders would benefit from structured methodological guidance. The design, planning, and conduct of such studies would benefit greatly from such guidance and would ideally result in the uptake of this type of research. Additionally, proper funding taking into account needed but time-consuming accommodations for participants is necessary. These strategy options aim to increase the amount of qualitative research that includes people with intellectual disabilities as participants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jppi.12476\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jppi.12476\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jppi.12476","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本简要报告提出了支持智障人士就死亡和临终相关主题进行定性研究的策略。我们准备了一份关于智障参与者参与的死亡和临终定性研究方法的范围综述,以及一项关于进入生命末期环境的感知障碍和促进因素的研究,该研究是与共同研究者在在线视频交流平台上进行的。通过开展这两项研究,我们发现了三项策略,我们认为这些策略将提高政策制定者、资助机构和其他研究人员对这项研究的吸收。这些策略涉及研究议程、结构化方法指导和资金分配。在规划有关死亡和临终主题的定性研究项目时,智障人士必须被列入有关死亡和临终主题的研究议程。为了履行这一义务,利益相关者将受益于结构化的方法指导。此类研究的设计、规划和实施将从此类指导中受益匪浅,并将在理想情况下促进此类研究的开展。此外,有必要提供适当的资金,同时考虑到为参与者提供必要但耗时的便利。这些战略方案旨在增加以智障人士为参与者的定性研究的数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Voice, disability and ‘end of life’ research: Strategies for including people with intellectual disabilities in qualitative research related to death and dying

This brief report proposes strategies to support qualitative research with people with intellectual disabilities on topics related to death and dying. We prepared a scoping review on methodological approaches used for qualitative research on death and dying involving participants with intellectual disabilities and a study on perceived barriers and facilitators to accessing end of life settings, conducted with co-researchers on an online video communication platform. Through conducting these two studies, we found three strategies that we believe will increase the uptake of this research for policymakers, funding bodies and other researchers. The strategies concern research agendas, structured methodological guidance, and allocation of funds. When planning out qualitative research projects about death and dying topics, people with intellectual disabilities must be on the research agendas on topics related to death and dying. To realize this obligation, stakeholders would benefit from structured methodological guidance. The design, planning, and conduct of such studies would benefit greatly from such guidance and would ideally result in the uptake of this type of research. Additionally, proper funding taking into account needed but time-consuming accommodations for participants is necessary. These strategy options aim to increase the amount of qualitative research that includes people with intellectual disabilities as participants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
Specialized medical equipment for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities allocated in Home and Community Based Services Issue Information Remote consultation: The experiences of community intellectual disability teams Advances and gaps in policy, practice, and research in transition for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities across four countries “It does change the narrative for health and social care” views of clinical and homeless service staff about the use of intellectual disability screening tools within homeless support pathways in the north of England
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1