{"title":"氯沙坦相对于其他血管紧张素受体拮抗剂对血清尿酸水平影响的meta分析","authors":"Jinjie Zhou, Yongwei Zhang, Lin Cheng","doi":"10.4314/tjpr.v22i9.31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To systematically analyze the disparity in uric acid reduction between losartan and other angiotensin receptor antagonists.Methods: A computer-based search was conducted in databases including EMBASE, PubMed, Wanfang, CNKI, Ovid MEDLINE, and Web of Science to identify original literature comparing the impact of losartan with other angiotensin receptor antagonists on blood uric acid levels. Utilizing the Cochrane Collaboration bias risk tool, a quality assessment of the included randomized controlled studies was conducted.Results: A total of 12 publications were obtained, consisting of 6 randomized controlled studies and 6 cohort studies. Five of the twelve publications assessed the impact of losartan compared to valsartan on blood uric acid levels. The heterogeneity analysis yielded I2 = 98 % (p < 0.01), indicating substantial variability among the studies. Findings indicated that losartan was more effective than valsartan in reducing blood uric acid levels (SMD = -3.26, 95 % CI (-5.01 to 1.51), p < 0.05). Four publications investigated the impact of losartan versus telmisartan on blood uric acid levels. The results revealed that losartan had a greater effect in reducing blood uric acid levels compared to telmisartan (SMD = -1.77, 95 % CI (-3.411 to -0.13), p < 0.05).Conclusion: Among the angiotensin receptor antagonists used as antihypertensive drugs, losartan stands out for its significant ability to reduce uric acid levels. This finding provides a strong evidencebase for making clinical medication decisions.","PeriodicalId":23347,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meta-analysis of the effect of losartan relative to other angiotensin receptor antagonists on serum uric acid level\",\"authors\":\"Jinjie Zhou, Yongwei Zhang, Lin Cheng\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/tjpr.v22i9.31\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: To systematically analyze the disparity in uric acid reduction between losartan and other angiotensin receptor antagonists.Methods: A computer-based search was conducted in databases including EMBASE, PubMed, Wanfang, CNKI, Ovid MEDLINE, and Web of Science to identify original literature comparing the impact of losartan with other angiotensin receptor antagonists on blood uric acid levels. Utilizing the Cochrane Collaboration bias risk tool, a quality assessment of the included randomized controlled studies was conducted.Results: A total of 12 publications were obtained, consisting of 6 randomized controlled studies and 6 cohort studies. Five of the twelve publications assessed the impact of losartan compared to valsartan on blood uric acid levels. The heterogeneity analysis yielded I2 = 98 % (p < 0.01), indicating substantial variability among the studies. Findings indicated that losartan was more effective than valsartan in reducing blood uric acid levels (SMD = -3.26, 95 % CI (-5.01 to 1.51), p < 0.05). Four publications investigated the impact of losartan versus telmisartan on blood uric acid levels. The results revealed that losartan had a greater effect in reducing blood uric acid levels compared to telmisartan (SMD = -1.77, 95 % CI (-3.411 to -0.13), p < 0.05).Conclusion: Among the angiotensin receptor antagonists used as antihypertensive drugs, losartan stands out for its significant ability to reduce uric acid levels. This finding provides a strong evidencebase for making clinical medication decisions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/tjpr.v22i9.31\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/tjpr.v22i9.31","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:系统分析氯沙坦与其他血管紧张素受体拮抗剂降低尿酸的差异。方法:计算机检索EMBASE、PubMed、万方、中国知网、Ovid MEDLINE、Web of Science等数据库,查找比较氯沙坦与其他血管紧张素受体拮抗剂对血尿酸水平影响的原始文献。利用Cochrane协作偏倚风险工具,对纳入的随机对照研究进行质量评估。结果:共获得文献12篇,其中随机对照研究6篇,队列研究6篇。12篇出版物中有5篇评估了氯沙坦与缬沙坦对血尿酸水平的影响。异质性分析得出I2 = 98% (p <0.01),表明研究之间存在很大差异。结果表明,氯沙坦在降低血尿酸水平方面比缬沙坦更有效(SMD = -3.26, 95% CI (-5.01 ~ 1.51), p <0.05)。四篇出版物调查了氯沙坦与替米沙坦对血尿酸水平的影响。结果显示,与替米沙坦相比,氯沙坦在降低血尿酸水平方面具有更大的效果(SMD = -1.77, 95% CI(-3.411至-0.13),p <0.05)。结论:在血管紧张素受体拮抗剂中,氯沙坦具有显著的降低尿酸水平的作用。这一发现为临床用药决策提供了强有力的证据基础。
Meta-analysis of the effect of losartan relative to other angiotensin receptor antagonists on serum uric acid level
Purpose: To systematically analyze the disparity in uric acid reduction between losartan and other angiotensin receptor antagonists.Methods: A computer-based search was conducted in databases including EMBASE, PubMed, Wanfang, CNKI, Ovid MEDLINE, and Web of Science to identify original literature comparing the impact of losartan with other angiotensin receptor antagonists on blood uric acid levels. Utilizing the Cochrane Collaboration bias risk tool, a quality assessment of the included randomized controlled studies was conducted.Results: A total of 12 publications were obtained, consisting of 6 randomized controlled studies and 6 cohort studies. Five of the twelve publications assessed the impact of losartan compared to valsartan on blood uric acid levels. The heterogeneity analysis yielded I2 = 98 % (p < 0.01), indicating substantial variability among the studies. Findings indicated that losartan was more effective than valsartan in reducing blood uric acid levels (SMD = -3.26, 95 % CI (-5.01 to 1.51), p < 0.05). Four publications investigated the impact of losartan versus telmisartan on blood uric acid levels. The results revealed that losartan had a greater effect in reducing blood uric acid levels compared to telmisartan (SMD = -1.77, 95 % CI (-3.411 to -0.13), p < 0.05).Conclusion: Among the angiotensin receptor antagonists used as antihypertensive drugs, losartan stands out for its significant ability to reduce uric acid levels. This finding provides a strong evidencebase for making clinical medication decisions.
期刊介绍:
We seek to encourage pharmaceutical and allied research of tropical and international relevance and to foster multidisciplinary research and collaboration among scientists, the pharmaceutical industry and the healthcare professionals.
We publish articles in pharmaceutical sciences and related disciplines (including biotechnology, cell and molecular biology, drug utilization including adverse drug events, medical and other life sciences, and related engineering fields). Although primarily devoted to original research papers, we welcome reviews on current topics of special interest and relevance.