跟上琼斯的脚步:aacsb认证学校的教师薪酬比较组

IF 1.3 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Education for Business Pub Date : 2023-09-05 DOI:10.1080/08832323.2023.2252557

Praveen Aggarwal, Joseph Grant

{"title":"跟上琼斯的脚步:aacsb认证学校的教师薪酬比较组","authors":"Praveen Aggarwal, Joseph Grant","doi":"10.1080/08832323.2023.2252557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Business schools frequently utilize AACSB’s Salary Survey (Staff Compensation and Demographic Survey, or the SCDS Report) to benchmark salaries being offered by other schools. While providing averages based on a national sample, the SCDS Report obscures differences that might exist in salary averages between masters-granting and doctoral-granting business schools. In this paper, we demonstrate how these differences inflate salary averages for masters-granting schools and present a step-by-step methodology that all participating AACSB-accredited schools that provide survey data can deploy to get salary data that are more peer-appropriate and reflective of market expectations.","PeriodicalId":47318,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education for Business","volume":"122 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Keeping up with the Joneses: Faculty salary comparison groups for AACSB-accredited schools\",\"authors\":\"Praveen Aggarwal, Joseph Grant\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08832323.2023.2252557\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Business schools frequently utilize AACSB’s Salary Survey (Staff Compensation and Demographic Survey, or the SCDS Report) to benchmark salaries being offered by other schools. While providing averages based on a national sample, the SCDS Report obscures differences that might exist in salary averages between masters-granting and doctoral-granting business schools. In this paper, we demonstrate how these differences inflate salary averages for masters-granting schools and present a step-by-step methodology that all participating AACSB-accredited schools that provide survey data can deploy to get salary data that are more peer-appropriate and reflective of market expectations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Education for Business\",\"volume\":\"122 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Education for Business\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2023.2252557\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education for Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2023.2252557","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

商学院经常利用AACSB的薪酬调查(员工薪酬和人口统计调查，或SCDS报告)来衡量其他商学院提供的薪资。虽然SCDS报告提供了基于全国样本的平均薪资，但它模糊了授予硕士学位和授予博士学位的商学院之间可能存在的平均薪资差异。在本文中，我们展示了这些差异是如何使授予硕士学位的学校的平均工资膨胀的，并提出了一个循序渐进的方法，所有参与aacsb认证的学校都可以提供调查数据，以获得更适合同行的工资数据，并反映市场预期。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Keeping up with the Joneses: Faculty salary comparison groups for AACSB-accredited schools

Business schools frequently utilize AACSB’s Salary Survey (Staff Compensation and Demographic Survey, or the SCDS Report) to benchmark salaries being offered by other schools. While providing averages based on a national sample, the SCDS Report obscures differences that might exist in salary averages between masters-granting and doctoral-granting business schools. In this paper, we demonstrate how these differences inflate salary averages for masters-granting schools and present a step-by-step methodology that all participating AACSB-accredited schools that provide survey data can deploy to get salary data that are more peer-appropriate and reflective of market expectations.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Education for Business EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-

CiteScore

3.10

自引率

8.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Education for Business is for those educating tomorrow''s businesspeople. The journal primarily features basic and applied research-based articles in entrepreneurship, accounting, communications, economics, finance, information systems, management, marketing, and other business disciplines. Along with the focus on reporting research within traditional business subjects, an additional expanded area of interest is publishing articles within the discipline of entrepreneurship. Articles report successful innovations in teaching and curriculum development at the college and postgraduate levels. Authors address changes in today''s business world and in the business professions that are fundamentally influencing the competencies that business graduates need. JEB also offers a forum for new theories and for analyses of controversial issues. Articles in the Journal fall into the following categories: Original and Applied Research; Editorial/Professional Perspectives; and Innovative Instructional Classroom Projects/Best Practices. Articles are selected on a blind peer-reviewed basis. Original and Applied Research - Articles published feature the results of formal research where findings have universal impact. Editorial/Professional Perspective - Articles published feature the viewpoint of primarily the author regarding important issues affecting education for business. Innovative Instructional Classroom Projects/Best Practices - Articles published feature the results of instructional experiments basically derived from a classroom project conducted at one institution by one or several faculty.